*
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
Ok, so today I'm starting this little summergame for allcomers - enjoy! It's called :
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
(Because, believe it or not, there are STILL people who steadfastly think that the imagery of 9/11
seen on the TV networks and on so-called "amateur footage" was quite real and authentic! )
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
Some people still believe that the Naudet 1st hit is REAL FOOTAGE.
So today's challenge (N°1) is...
Show us any CERTIFIABLY AUTHENTIC footage featuring similarly bopping buildings!
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE!"
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE!"
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
- Member
- Posts: 746
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
- Contact:
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
That's right, Antipodeanantipodean @ Jul 24 2010, 01:07 AM wrote: Sorry Simon, I can't ever recall a plane crash happening at exactly the same time as an earthquake :lol:
You win a September Clues "Smart Comment of the Day" !
(The winner of this summer-contest gets a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars)
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :P :
Some people still believe that the Naudet 1st hit is REAL FOOTAGE.
So today's challenge (N°2) is...
Same as question N°1 (see above). Show us any CERTIFIABLY AUTHENTIC footage featuring similarly bopping buildings!
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :P :
Some people still believe that the Naudet 1st hit is REAL FOOTAGE.
So today's challenge (N°2) is...
Same as question N°1 (see above). Show us any CERTIFIABLY AUTHENTIC footage featuring similarly bopping buildings!
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
MOST HILARIOUS RESPONSE TO "DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE 1 & 2 :
(Clare scores 5 points towards a ride on the next NASA mission to Mars)
(Clare scores 5 points towards a ride on the next NASA mission to Mars)
"Are the "earthquakes" you point out in the Naudet 1st hit footage the underground bombs, do you think?"
by Clare Kuehn - (message received on my Youtube channel)
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
- Member
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
- Contact:
That video was actually shot by that Irish priest Fire Fighter Chaplain guy as he was ALL around NYC helping thousands of hurt and dying people, he tripped over the sidewalk as he was shooting and it made it look like the buildings were shaking WHILE at the same time asking for the Dick Clark jet black at a lower manhattan hair salon!!! Come On that's Pretty Good!! haha!! :P
Come on Simon, dont be silly, there was no earthquake.
The reason is that hurricane Erin was just outside New York blowing powerful catastrophic and horrific winds over New York that very sad day.
You can clearly see all the smoke move in one cluster to the left and there is no way the smoke behaves that way without the powerful hurricane Erin.
You can also see the tower swaying to the left and that's why you can see the crack in the tower starting to appear to the right of that gasping hole.
Simon, do you think the hijackers intentional plan was to scare us and do a flyby to the right of the towers "Obama style" but something went wrong and the powerful winds blew that Boeing 767 in to the north tower.
Sincerely
Clarito Cluck
The reason is that hurricane Erin was just outside New York blowing powerful catastrophic and horrific winds over New York that very sad day.
You can clearly see all the smoke move in one cluster to the left and there is no way the smoke behaves that way without the powerful hurricane Erin.
You can also see the tower swaying to the left and that's why you can see the crack in the tower starting to appear to the right of that gasping hole.
Simon, do you think the hijackers intentional plan was to scare us and do a flyby to the right of the towers "Obama style" but something went wrong and the powerful winds blew that Boeing 767 in to the north tower.
Sincerely
Clarito Cluck
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
-
- Member
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
- Contact:
YUP gotta Love that sideways horizontal smoke Ploom, maybe this Hurricane Erin deal has some vailidity.... :wacko: Was it named for Erin Andrews? That chic played such a victim but she loved knowing that the country saw her flaunting that ass...And Wow look at all the exposure she has now..D.Duck @ Jul 25 2010, 09:45 PM wrote: Come on Simon, dont be silly, there was no earthquake.
The reason is that hurricane Erin was just outside New York blowing powerful catastrophic and horrific winds over New York that very sad day.
You can clearly see all the smoke move in one cluster to the left and there is no way the smoke behaves that way without the powerful hurricane Erin.
You can also see the tower swaying to the left and that's why you can see the crack in the tower starting to appear to the right of that of that gasping hole.
Simon, do you think the hijackers intentional plan was to scare us and do a flyby to the right of the towers "Obama style" but something went wrong and the powerful winds blew that Boeing 767 in to the north tower.
Sincerely
Clarito Cluck
-
- Banned
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:52 am
- Contact:
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
**********Win a free ride on the next NASA mission to planet Mars**********
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
COMPARE THE "PLANE-SHAPED GASHES"(at far right) ON THESE 2 SHOTS
From the Naudet movie 9/11 (shortly after "1st hit")
From the History Channel (at a later moment in the day of 9/11)
Now, please know that an umpteenth 'new amateur' video released by NIST in 2010 (9 years after 9/11) shows that - hey! -it is not meant to be a gash, but appears to be black smoke billowing out from a distant office window at the very rightmost edge of WTC1. See the black smoke subsiding here in the matter of seconds:
Jim Huibregtse clip_1A http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpmMEUAwN4k
So today's challenge (N°3) is...
1: What caused that office to catch fire - since the alleged 'airplane' hit nowhere near it?
2: What caused that office fire to burn out/extinguish in the matter of seconds ?
The full sequence of the Naudet first hit - for your reference:
"THE PLANE FACTS" (short video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :
COMPARE THE "PLANE-SHAPED GASHES"(at far right) ON THESE 2 SHOTS
From the Naudet movie 9/11 (shortly after "1st hit")
From the History Channel (at a later moment in the day of 9/11)
Now, please know that an umpteenth 'new amateur' video released by NIST in 2010 (9 years after 9/11) shows that - hey! -it is not meant to be a gash, but appears to be black smoke billowing out from a distant office window at the very rightmost edge of WTC1. See the black smoke subsiding here in the matter of seconds:
Jim Huibregtse clip_1A http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpmMEUAwN4k
So today's challenge (N°3) is...
1: What caused that office to catch fire - since the alleged 'airplane' hit nowhere near it?
2: What caused that office fire to burn out/extinguish in the matter of seconds ?
The full sequence of the Naudet first hit - for your reference:
"THE PLANE FACTS" (short video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo
http://www.septemberclues.org
-
- Member
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:45 am
- Contact:
This is quite easy to debunk, :Psimonshack 4 Jul 24 2010, 10:29 AM wrote: *
Ok, so today I'm starting this little summergame for allcomers - enjoy! It's called :
"DEBUNK A SEPTEMBER CLUE !"
And today's clue for allcomers to debunk is... :P :
Some people still believe that the Naudet 1st hit is REAL FOOTAGE.
So today's challenge (N?1) is...
Show us any real footage featuring similarly bopping buildings!
I can explain why the buildings are moving. Thanks to two inventions invented 4.5 billion years ago. One named the sun, and the other named the wind. Below, we can clearly see how they played a part in the buildings movement on 9/11.
Firstly, The heat from the sun expanded the concrete, and when the wind came along it reduced the size of the concrete.
Therefore explaining, the shaking effect.
Temperature variations in concrete
Changes in the temperature of concrete can cause expanding, As the concrete gets hotter, it expands; as concrete gets cooler, it contracts. This is similar for many other materials you have probably learned about.
Secondly,
It is a well known fact that on windy days, the wind has known to sway buildings and skyscrapers? The streets in New York are very long? therefore, creating wind tunnels, which would make a building sway on impact.
Therefore explaining the swaying effect.
Wind Resistance
In addition to the vertical force of gravity, skyscrapers/buildings. Also have to deal with the horizontal force of wind. Most skyscrapers can easily move several feet in either direction, like a swaying tree, without damaging their structural integrity.
MARS solar suntan B) ... Here I come!!!!
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact: