Egypt 'Revolution'- all the way to Libya 'War'

[dwalkerdon23]

On the local 11:00 News last night, they said that Obama has pledged not to send troops to Libya. I knew that no military action was going to be taken, because nothing is really going on over there in the first place! This whole "Arab Revolution", is just an excuse to raise oil prices, just like they did three years ago, when gas went past 4 Dollars a gallon.

[warriorhun]

Dear All,

Laughing out loud again, at a new video from LOLvideos Inc. (full name and address: Libyan Outrageously Lying Videos MSM Inc., Tripoli Hilton, Libya), the title of video is:
Libyan Mercenaries Forced to Eat Dead Dog & Kiss a Dead Dog!
Link to the LOLvideo: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=288_1300897750
Now this news story resembles more to the real Africa than news stories of tribal "pro-democracy" fighters wanting to kill and to die for a chance to vote every four years on multiple political parties, and wanting to give voting rights to every Libyan, including the members of all their enemy tribes...
...but still I guess it is a fake video again. But I have to admit: even if the video was real, I would laugh out just as loudly!

UPDATE:
I will accept the "nothing really happened in Libya" MindWar scenario if, and only if there really will not be a Western land invasion, and Gaddhafi remains as the ruler of Libya for an another few more years, to play the necessary new bogeyman on the NWO puppet masters' orders. We will know it in the future when the events have unfolded.
But yep, the MindWar scenario is one of the possible scenarios in this stage of the "Crescent of Democracy"-plan.

UPDATE 2:
Europe is in danger of Libyan terrorist threat?
Quoting from this link: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20110323/twl ... f21e0.html

MI5 warning over Libyan terror attacks

MI5 has warned its Nato allies of the risk of terror attacks in the wake of military action in Libya.
The security service reportedly sent a memo a few hours before the start of the operation, after intercepting a number of conversations among British-based Libyans.
According to an Italian newspaper, the discussions about how to support Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi were held by expatriates who have retained close links with their homeland.
Although the Home Office has refused to comment on the report, the overall threat level remains at "severe", meaning an attack is thought to be highly likely.

That reads: Mistaravim pseudo-terror groups, playing Arab expatriates from Libya, may very likely commit faked or false-flag terror attacks on mainland Europe to make our blood-pressure rise, so we will be foaming at the mouth and demand a severe bombing of Libya in retaliation, and an invasion of Libya to cut out the roots of the problem...
Of course, in real life, real terror attacks in Europe by the Libyans would be an officially declared express death wish of the regime, and Gaddhafi's personal opting out with "suicide by cop". So in real life, the old fox would never try such a thing. However, according to the media Gaddhafi is crazy, so the pseudo-terror attacks will be sold to us as the last throes of the rabid dog dictator...

[dwalkerdon23]

If any of you remember, around 3-4 years ago, when the media was saying how Iran was a terrorist nation, & that Bush was ready for nuclear war with Iran, it actually ended up being a hoax! Shortly afterward Ahmadinejad gave a speech at Columbia University, & had an interview with Katie Couric on CBS News. The MSM news outlets are nothing but propaganda

Gadhafi is in on this whole hoax, & I am sure of it. Just like Mubarak, who is being replaced by Suleiman. George Soros & Zbigniew Brzezinski orchestrated everything.

Zbigniew Brzezinski & Henry Kissinger orchestrated the fall of the Berlin Wall a year in advance, the whole thing was staged & carefully planned out for TV audiences worldwide.

I can see right through their lies & deception.

[gwynned]

What about the allied bombing? Is that real?

I tend to think NOT, if this is any indication:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsmO3VkTzz4

So if there is no rebellion, no violent repression and no 'no fly zone,' what's the point?

[Dcopymope]

And 99% if not 100% of the people at your job probably see you as a loon, which is why I personally have reduced my effort to inform the masses about anything, whether it be in person or the internet. Most will only talk about nonsense and refuses to face reality regarding anything; they would rather stay inside the box, the fake reality that is presented to them. If they haven't woken up by now then they never will.

This is also my position on small talk about fakery. No one is interested, no one wants to hear about it, in large part because it would require people to stop trusting that every government statement, and every mainstream media image/video, is on good faith, and is an accurate reflection of some reality. Almost no one will give up both of those security blankets under any circumstance. Plus, psychology studies have shown that nearly everyone ignores evidence that counters their beliefs, rather than taking into account the new evidence and modifying their beliefs.

I'm with you. What I find interesting is the outright hostility I receive when I even suggest that perhaps, just possibly, things are not what they seem and there just might be a pattern of deception going on here.....and then I get the look. The kind of look that would have caused you to find yourself in the principal's office or a parole board. "This is sacred ground. No Trespassing." If the look doesn't shut you up, the 'change of subject' will remind you that discussions about conspiracies or what is real in the media are very unwelcome.

I was recently at a party and found myself talking to another conspiracy theorist. It felt kinda wrong, though. It was like we both found out we worked for the mafia or something, as we spoke in hushed tones and moved away from the crowd so that we wouldn't be heard.

Perhaps what is needed is a secret handshake known only among conspiracy theorists, like back in the day gay men wore scarves in their right ---- or was it left? ---- pocket.

Well, like I was saying, the very same people that give you those kinds of reactions will later be the same people that will report you to the authorities, or snitch on you, just like what happened in the Soviet Union and every other totalitarian regime you can name in history. The citizenry was turned against each other, they were turned into rent a spies for the government, so I'd tread very lightly as time goes along (not to say that they don't already know who we all are).

Case in point: Homeland Security tells us that if we see (or hear) something say something

"Homeland Security Begins with Hometown Security" says Neopolitano

From the article above:

"Homeland security begins with hometown security, and our efforts to confront threats in our communities are most effective when they are led by local law enforcement and involve strong collaboration with the communities and citizens they serve," said Secretary Napolitano.

If any of you remember, around 3-4 years ago, when the media was saying how Iran was a terrorist nation, & that Bush was ready for nuclear war with Iran, it actually ended up being a hoax! Shortly afterward Ahmadinejad gave a speech at Columbia University, & had an interview with Katie Couric on CBS News. The MSM news outlets are nothing but propaganda

Gadhafi is in on this whole hoax, & I am sure of it. Just like Mubarak, who is being replaced by Suleiman. George Soros & Zbigniew Brzezinski orchestrated everything.

Zbigniew Brzezinski & Henry Kissinger orchestrated the fall of the Berlin Wall a year in advance, the whole thing was staged & carefully planned out for TV audiences worldwide.

I can see right through their lies & deception.

So do you think that Ahmadinejad is in on the hoax as well? Its quite possible, we all know the NWO plays all sides of conflicts. If he isn't controlled opposition and they were to kill or kidnap him the moment he stepped foot on American soil it still wouldn't mean much in of itself, as he is just a figure head like Obama is.

What about the allied bombing? Is that real?

I tend to think NOT, if this is any indication:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsmO3VkTzz4

So if there is no rebellion, no violent repression and no 'no fly zone,' what's the point?

If anything is actually happening its either being exaggerated or downplayed. I can say that the real action may start not long after NATO takes over, which is still the Anglo American Establishment under another name, assuming nothing big is actually happening now.

[warriorhun]

Dear gwynned, Dcopymope, and All,

Regarding the possible "nothing is really happening in Libya" MindWar scenario, I will give the idea a serious thinking, how it would fit into the "Crescent of Democracy"-plan, on the pros and cons, and will try to come up with a plausible theory. I suggest you do the same, with the clashing of different ideas we can achieve great results IMO. As there is a massive image fakery operation going on in MSM regarding Libya, we can move in our speculations to the question: is it a non-event with totally faked reality on TV, or an event with totally altered reality on TV? Are they lying about real events, or are they inventing non-events?

Dear Dcopymope,

you say:

So do you think that Ahmadinejad is in on the hoax as well? Its quite possible, we all know the NWO plays all sides of conflicts. If he isn't controlled opposition and they were to kill or kidnap him the moment he stepped foot on American soil it still wouldn't mean much in of itself, as he is just a figure head like Obama is.

The greatest hoax about Ahmadinejad in MSM is that he is kind of all-powerful dictator in Iran. He is no such thing: he is Prime Minister of Iran. What they do not say on MSM is that Iran is a theocracy: the real power is held by the priests. The real power rests in the hand of the Supreme Leader of Iran, who is now Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hoseyni Khamenei. And even he is not some one man absolute dictator, he was elected by the Assembly of Experts. The Supreme Leader is assuming supreme command of the armed forces, he decides on the declaration of war and peace, and the mobilization of the armed forces, and he appoints the Prime Minister, who is now Mr. A in his windcheater. So, good ol' Ahmadinejad could not order a nuclear attack against mainland USA, even if those iranian atom reactors were not for peaceful use in the first place, and he wanted to draw first blood...
(here is what wikipedia has to say on the Supreme Leader of Iran: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Leader_of_Iran )

you say:

I can say that the real action may start not long after NATO takes over, which is still the Anglo American Establishment under another name

NATO = Entente Cordiale + Small-Entente + gelded Germany.

[Dcopymope]

Dear gwynned, Dcopymope, and All,

Regarding the possible "nothing is really happening in Libya" MindWar scenario, I will give the idea a serious thinking, how it would fit into the "Crescent of Democracy"-plan, on the pros and cons, and will try to come up with a plausible theory. I suggest you do the same, with the clashing of different ideas we can achieve great results IMO. As there is a massive image fakery operation going on in MSM regarding Libya, we can move in our speculations to the question: is it a non-event with totally faked reality on TV, or an event with totally altered reality on TV? Are they lying about real events, or are they inventing non-events?

I would say that its a real event only we're given fake or altered reality of that event to distort our perceptions of it, just like 9/11 and almost every other event. The lie is the movie or fake reality presented to us by both by the mainstream media and the dis-info agents in the alternative media.

Dear Dcopymope,

you say:

So do you think that Ahmadinejad is in on the hoax as well? Its quite possible, we all know the NWO plays all sides of conflicts. If he isn't controlled opposition and they were to kill or kidnap him the moment he stepped foot on American soil it still wouldn't mean much in of itself, as he is just a figure head like Obama is.

The greatest hoax about Ahmadinejad in MSM is that he is kind of all-powerful dictator in Iran. He is no such thing: he is Prime Minister of Iran. What they do not say on MSM is that Iran is a theocracy: the real power is held by the priests. The real power rests in the hand of the Supreme Leader of Iran, who is now Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hoseyni Khamenei. And even he is not some one man absolute dictator, he was elected by the Assembly of Experts. The Supreme Leader is assuming supreme command of the armed forces, he decides on the declaration of war and peace, and the mobilization of the armed forces, and he appoints the Prime Minister, who is now Mr. A in his windcheater. So, good ol' Ahmadinejad could not order a nuclear attack against mainland USA, even if those iranian atom reactors were not for peaceful use in the first place, and he wanted to draw first blood...
(here is what wikipedia has to say on the Supreme Leader of Iran: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Leader_of_Iran )

Well explained, like I said, the lie is the movie version of reality that is presented to us by the establishment media. But you see, its not just Mahmoud thats presented as an all-powerful dictator, according to the establishment media the Iranian government in general is the blood thirsty dictator. So it really doesn't matter how the Iranian government actually operates to the perps and the masses that soak up their bull shit, as facts don't matter when you have a clear political agenda, in this case of regime change.

you say:

I can say that the real action may start not long after NATO takes over, which is still the Anglo American Establishment under another name

NATO = Entente Cordiale + Small-Entente + gelded Germany.

You know, we all know that the perps speak to us mainly in symbology, or gang signs, so if you look closely at the NATO logo you will see that it is actually a disguised swastika, which should tell you all you need to know about NATO.



There is no such thing as coincidence or happenstance with the New World Order, everything is coldly calculated and hidden in plain sight.

[warriorhun]

Dear All,

Another funny Libya battle picture from LOLvideos Inc.

You are a reporter, with special permission from Gaddhafi to accompany his tank battallion to the tribal areas to take pictures of their massacring of civilians. A NATO airstrike hits your tank column, so you jump out of the APC, and...
I mean, that is courage. You do not cower, you plant your feet firmly on the grond five metres from the tank, and when the rocket hits it, you click your camera. And then the Libyans want all the world to see their humiliation, so they let you up-load the picture...
Or what?

A tank belonging to Gaddafi forces explodes in a ball of flames after an air strike by allied forces

[dwalkerdon23]

On March 7th, Russia Today Posted a video on youtube called Wag The Dog: Media blamed for covering Libya unrest with fog of war. Another day, they posted a video saying that the Russian Military has confirmed that the Libyan Airstrikes never happened.

I am 100% sure that nothing is happening in Libya. If anything is happening, where are the real ground reports with real battle footage. All of the photos & videos that they have shown on TV look like something out of Rambo III!

As I posted before, on the 11:00 news the other day, they said that Obama has pledged not to send troops to Libya. Of course he wont, because this so called "unrest" is a lie in the first place!

This is Pallywood-style material.

[gwynned]

On March 7th, Russia Today Posted a video on youtube called Wag The Dog: Media blamed for covering Libya unrest with fog of war. Another day, they posted a video saying that the Russian Military has confirmed that the Libyan Airstrikes never happened.

I am 100% sure that nothing is happening in Libya. If anything is happening, where are the real ground reports with real battle footage. All of the photos & videos that they have shown on TV look like something out of Rambo III!

I totally agree. Strangely, no one else other than the few people on this list seem to have noticed.

[dwalkerdon23]

CBS Is Divided Over the Use Of False Images In Broadcasts

Published: January 13, 2000
New York Times

[Andrew Heyward, the president of CBS News,] said that he understood the argument against the use of the technology -- which is widely employed in sports and some entertainment shows -- on news programs. The danger is "that it looks too real and therefore it's wrong or potentially wrong," he said. "I certainly agree it's potentially subject to abuse."

He noted that advances in computer-generated techniques had made things like missiles hitting Baghdad and airplanes crashing look so real that it was incumbent on networks to underscore that these were not real images.


This is exactly what is going on right now, & this article was written 11 years ago, so think of how advanced CGI is now!

[guivre]

On March 7th, Russia Today Posted a video on youtube called Wag The Dog: Media blamed for covering Libya unrest with fog of war. Another day, they posted a video saying that the Russian Military has confirmed that the Libyan Airstrikes never happened.

I totally agree. Strangely, no one else other than the few people on this list seem to have noticed.

RT promotes stories in a tabloid style, and being supported by the Russian government, I find it annoying to follow every day. However this made me curious, so here is the link.

http://rt.com/news/airstrikes-libya-russian-military/

It reads March 1st. Whatever is going on and/or being faked in Libya, that is a bit early on the timeline everyone else was given.

[gwynned]

Reaching new comedic heights. This is an odd little story about a seasoned broadcaster who suddenly speaks nonsense about Libya. Odd enough that it would happen and be aired. Odder still that it would become a story in itself. Is there a message here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2IEo4JV ... r_embedded

[Guerrero]

Dear Guerrero,

you say:

I came upon some ridickkkk! fake photos via Yahoo story about US missile strikes on Libya...first, the main story had a photo of what looked like cutout people pasted on a background, and then there was a link to a slideshow which had numerous, and I mean NUMEROUS photos of subsaharan African looking blokes and/or blokes with their faces wrapped up in scarves (therefore completely hidden) holding up a bunch of signs in english (typed in exact same font and sized font and IN ENGLISH - mind you, Libyans aren't well known for their fluency in English with statements like "Shariah will take over the world." "Muslims for Jihad" etc etc etc same old shit, different day.

Could you please give a link? I am always ready to share a good laugh on Libya pictures.

Dear Warriorhun,

I wish I had copied and pasted those photos here because now I can't find them on Yahoo and the slideshows only link to one picture at a time, what are they trying to do here? minimize our access to this ridick photos??? well i will keep looking, but in the meantime i offer you some new gems:



Here's the caption of the photo, some real queerness if u ask me:

Libyan government soldiers wave in

Libyan government soldiers wave at foreign journalists at Moammar Gadhafi's Bab Al Azizia compound in in Tripoli, Libya, Saturday March 19, 2011. President Barack Obama authorized limited military action against Libya Saturday, saying Moammar Gadhafi's continued assault on his own people left the U.S. and its international partners with no other choice. The Pentagon said 112 cruise missiles were launched from US and UK ships and subs, hitting 20 targets.… Read more »
(AP Photo/Jerome Delay)

why are gadhafi's soldiers friendly and waving at foreign journalists? i thought gadhafi was all about keeping the journalists out of the country, but now he's letting them into his compound to photograph soldiers who are chillin in walmart bought lawn chairs??? And why is there always at least one libyan guy holding a gun in the same kind of pose that the dude in the lawnchair is posing?


Is it just me or is there something queer about the perspective and size in this photo with that missile and the surrounding environment?

And then there's this one which is supposed to be included in this article on CBS news but it's not, therefore there's no caption telling me what it falsely represents, and doesn't the peace sign all these dudes are flashing in every pic actually mean something else in the arab world????

[Guerrero]

Warriorhun --

So after some searching, googling, etc. (had to get off of yahoo because apparently they removed that particular slideshow ) I typed "islamist protest in libya" and came up with some photos similar to the ones that were included in this slideshow supposedly about the US missile strikes on libya . There's definitely some funny business here. I'll have to look up this photographer credited with these photos (Richard Baker). Thing to note is that the title of this slideshow is "Libyan exiles protest"...note the guy hiding most of his face in the front of the pic with the glasses.....and i am supposed to believe this is a libyan exile???? and that dude next to him looks indian/southeast asian


Now this next one is even funnier...I am sorry but I just don't believe that these people are having these banners with the exact same font made up (did they all get together and go to the same printer??) I mean protest signs, real protest signs at protests, are almost ALWAYS hand written, in my personal experience anyway...this is just so...................................fdup:



I will continue to search for more of these because I think this is a subtext being reported for a reason. there is a fear of libyans and libyan terrorism that is trying to be rooted into the minds of the unsuspecting, ignoramuses that believe everything the telly and their gov tells 'em.

Edited to add some found info on photographer of above photos, Richard Baker:

So apparently he's also known for his visual effects in the harry potter and willy wonka remake.........of course he'd be tied to the movie industry http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1643941/ As far as finding out REAL info on this guy (meaning outside of his website and his created connections)...that seems to be non-existent.