Methinks the lady doth protest too much.Euphoria wrote:How can you be so dismissive, Maat? Jim Tucker uses aides and attendants to leak information and he has a very high accuracy rate in the predictions he makes. His summaries usually come true two to three years later. I'm not stupid enough to believe that just because something is called 'American Free Press' that it must mean it's spectacularly impartial and cuts right to the truth in everything the investigator finds. But all you are doing is going to the other extreme and dismissing it out of hand, without having looked into Tucker's work in much detail (which is obvious, considering you connect him with Alex Jones simply because he has sometimes been referenced on Jones' show, like many other quality reseachers, including Alan Watt).
(And don't you dare accuse me of a gender-based insult. That line is a direct quote from MacBeth.)
I'm with Maat on this point.










