Ok, I'm just catching up on this negative diversionary attempt, but as I'd started writing this response last night, I figured it was still relevant.
Dallasgoldbug wrote:OK hold up. FIRST of all the spelling mistakes, yes noted and have a thousand and one thing going on, so if you have a problem with the errors YOU SHOULD EMAIL THEM TO ME AND I WILL ADDRESS THEM!!
First off, that's a typically familiar but lame excuse. Why would or should anyone have to bother, since you know your way around computer programs, applications and internet browsers why wouldn't you use the latest Word progs or an auto-spellchecker?
2. My logo. IF YOU choose to listen to COINTELPRO who will jump at the chance to demonize those who speak the truth then so be it. It your life and your right to do so. But for the educated individual who may not know what that is, usually is smart enough to contact me (since my email is all over the place) and simply ask.
For those who are interested and not agenda driven the "compass" you are referring to is called a Golden Mean Gauge. ITS FOR MEASURING FACES! THATS WHAT I DO!!!! IDIOT! Look it up and get you head out of your ass. Not everyone is willing to jump at the first conspiracy theory that pops in their head. AND I hope you keep a list of everyone who made a decision about my work based on a GOLDEN MEAN GAUGE, because you who did are not ready for the truth, as you wont know what to do with it and it will cause you to interpret it incorrectly and act out irresponsibly.
Really! So perhaps you can explain to us instead of reactive, accusatory name-calling, if you really use a "Golden Mean Gauge" for "measuring faces" why you haven't shown &/or demonstrated that method in your "photo" comparisons (i.e. if it were actually a scientific tool rather than only for subjective evaluation of beauty & balance ratios).
However, your logo doesn't even resemble a stylized
"Golden Mean Gauge" OR a 'Golden Section Gauge', only a compass:
Your logo: —------------------------------------- Compass: --------------------- Golden Section/Fibonacci Gauge:
(Logo: created in Adobe "2010/02/12-17:32:00" per XMP data)
is a Golden Mean Gauge
3. Alex jones. AS I HAVE SAID, he has done a lot of good and brought attention to things that needed attention. With that said, I disagree with his recent down turn, combined with my new found understanding of the mainstream and the fakery going on.
I don't listen to him and haven't for some time now, but if you want to get your message out you don't go around insulting those who have a platform. This is something the COINTELPRO like to get people to do so they ostracizes themselves.
Strange you haven't figured out then that Jones IS part of that "cointelpro" you protest too much
about to cyber-herd, distract, divert attention away from & protect the Media complicity and fakery from exposure. The ultimate purpose being to not only paint ALL government disbelievers as impotent, ranting loons like himself, chasing disinfo red herrings into dead ends and tar pits of confusion, but specifically to ostracize those of us who get too close to target: the corporate Media that feeds him!
Oh, and maybe I'm peculiar, but I only ever needed to hear Alex Jones once to know he was full of shit! Any other time after that only confirmed it.
4. AS FOR THE LEGAL PRINT AT THE BOTTOM OF MY SITE. IT simply says this is what I believe to be true. AND IT PROTECTS ME FROM IDIOTS THAT LIKE TO JUMP TP CONCLUSIONS AND ARE SUE HAPPY. I dont give a rats ass what you think of me, you can call me every name in the book, AGAIN its your right to do so, I ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT MYSELF, and will, and rave a right to say it how I see it, WHICH I DO. If you don't like tough titty!
Who gives a "rat's ass" about any "legal print at the bottom of your site"? I don't know who queried that (maybe I missed it), I noted your publication of the link origin and
IP geo-location of your site visitors for all to see (nice spin after you spam your stuff everywhere like you did here).
I also noted your prominent link to a list of Media Perp Puppet's radio shows, e.g. Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Alex Jones etc.
5. What else...let me think...Oh yeah, about the ways to disagree with me in a forum. Thats what you want. I know you want me to focus on your Bullshit comments intended to distract me from my work.
Funny, that's just what we were thinking here about your spam visit dangling contaminated 'fruit' as juicy "research" bait.
Let me be perfectly clear. 1. I do this to uncover the liars and the corrupt individuals that are bringing this country to its knees. 2. Then aid with the prosecution of those individuals. 3. Make sure the facts I find are posted and distributed to others so they can get the word out. 4. Go back to my normal life.
First you have to recognize and understand what
it is you're looking at to uncover the truth about anything. Comparing faked and planted photos as if they're real, is not going to get anyone anywhere but lost up Bullshit Boulevard in the Outer Limits of Perpsville.
2. The only way to "prosecute" any perpetrators is to get the "facts" straight yourself, then help awaken enough people to what the programming lies we're subjected to every day really are, in all
their insidious shapes and forms.
Only when the enlightened outnumber the sleepwalkers will there be any chance of real liberty or justice for any of us.
NOW, did you see anywhere in those 4 goals, the words "make friends", "kiss some corporations ass", "censor findings because they may hurt feelings", NO! Im not doing this to write a book, produce a movie, get famous, or get rich.
IN FACT, I have since I have started this work turned down 3 BOOK DEALS, 2 DOCUMENTARY DEALS, QUIT MY RADIO SHOW BECAUSE IT WAS TAKING ME AWAY FROM MY RESEARCH! SO if you want to attempt to attack my motives I believe you can go find yourself some more shoes because one is in your mouth and the other is up your ass
Oh you poor altruistic martyr!
Your "motives" can only be demonstrated by the credibility of your research methods and findings, and from what I've seen is all based on disinformation, faked images and subjectively contrived perceptions as "evidence."
It makes no difference to us whether you're an actual shill agent or just a zealous ideologue ( "useful idiot"), the 'fruit' is still contaminated — no matter how enticing you try to make it look.
e.g. As if comparing a poor quality, shooped pic of a partial ear with another of dubious origin wasn't silly enough, comparing obviously standard dental crowns on two clearly different
women (in 'perfect smile' obsessed America) was the extra spin that exposed your 'method'.
So, ignorant or deliberate, it makes no difference when the results are based on misperceptions, presumptions and/or bad methods/science.
It could also be inferred that you achieved your purpose here and scored one for the perps with the negative distraction you've created, couldn't it!
AS FOR FAKE MEDIA if you were even remotely intelligent you would already know that is about the most stupid question one could ever pull out of your ass. Im not even going to take the time to address it because its obvious.
So Im sure Ill be posting another rant like this since I have only spent two minutes on this site and wanted to address some of the little children that seem to be lurking on these pages.
So why haven't you grasped the ramifications of "Fake Media" = Fake IMAGES?
Needless to say, attacking or disparaging the members here and thereby our meticulous research is not going to convince anyone of your alleged bona fides
DO NOT get me pissed or I guarantee if you are COINTELPRO I WILL STOP AT NOTHING digging up your past and WILL out you if I feel you deserve it.
Nice! So if you
decide anyone who disputes your subjective 'conclusions' based on dodgy methods, shooped photos and spin-doctor pseudo-science is the 'enemy' (i.e.an Alex Jones type), you will go after and spin your contrived "research" methods & 'conclusions' on them too?
I guess if that
doesn't wake up any still granting you some benefit of doubt, nothing will.
Its hard being creative when all you want to do is curse. ;-)
That's one thing I can agree with, except our
research is not based on "being creative" but outing those who are doing it to deceive
P.S. for all of you that have shown support, thank you very much. Its greatly appreciated and you have my support in addressing those who attack you for promoting the truth. Feel free to contact me with what ever you have questions with and items you want me to look at.
"Don't seek the truth, only cease to cherish (your) opinions
." — Zen proverb
N B “When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do.” — William Blake