I agree that it seems that Dan must have been some kind of actor since his dad was a vicsim, but I don't think his potential murder would or has in any way given credibility or glory to Luke. If anything, I think you may be right that the perps didn't like the storyline or he was to move onto other things. Could be that they were worried people would look into who his dad really was.nonhocapito wrote: Like upstream noted, it is pretty simple: Wallace's alleged father is a vicsim. In other words, it never existed, never died on 9/11 and all that. So how could Dan Wallace be in any way a real character?
As to the reasons for the tragic death/murder, it was probably useful to give credibility and glory to Rudkowski. That's enough motive, in my opinion, considering that fake stories are a dime a dozen in that circle. There can be any sort of reason why Wallace was made disappear. Maybe it was a planned disappearance from the start, to connect the old vicsim generation to the new truther generation. Maybe he wasn't good enough an actor so they changed storyline. Maybe that actor moved to other things. But even if the disappearance constitutes a sign of internal fighting and murder, it is not more significant that a murder due to mafia infighting. But personally I find this "truth" the less likely to be. If the actor playing Wallace had been really murdered, we simply would never have heard of that angle of the story, and we would never have heard of "Dan Wallace" in the first place.
I first heard about this guy long before I saw anything about vicsims, back in 2007. And basically, it was the video with the Web Fairy lady that got me curious.
Oops, I meant "WebFairy"(not Truth Fairy), Rosalee Grable , who apparently is nuts, but the video I referred to has disappeared, and was only online for a very short amount of time, which leads me to conclude that orchestrated or not, they don't want us to see it anymore. Which makes me think their might have been some truth to it. At one part in the video, she even says "he was supporting investigating no planes". That would seem like an odd statement for an orchestrated video. My experience with the truthlings around 2007 was that no planes was to be shouted down. That combined with the strange behavior from Luke and Matt and the quick removal of the video from the internet, is what made me suspicious. It was what made me finally write off Luke as cointel.nonhocapito wrote: I don't know what you mean with "truth fairy", but whoever was wearing that "investigate Dan Wallace murder" t-shirt I think was simply in cahoots with the "we are change" gang, and the confrontation was just part of the confusing game. The final purpose of the game is, clearly, to support the reality of Wallace and, consequently, to support the reality of his vicsim fireman father. While the murder accusations, hear hear, are never proved or even really investigated.
Because in this coward, fake world, things never really "happen".
Isreal...Freemasons... CIA, what's the difference? They're all the same people. My research went down a different path when I found out that the guy I refer to a lot who is not just any mason, but a Sinclair, also had a mezuzah on his door. Why would a Scottish Rite Freemason who says he's a christian have one of those on his door? (he was the first owner of the house too). As it turns out, the British crown claims to be the direct descendants of the lost tribe of Judea, that's why the Queen of England has the Stone of Scone, or Jacob's Pillow, right under her throne. The so called "Chosen Ones" are blond haired and blue eyed, not bushy haired and hook nosed, though apparently there is a lot of coordination between the two. Their goal is to re establish a one world order HQ'd in Babylon.nonhocapito wrote: It is true that such a high percentage of israeli and jewish ties inside this alleged movement, if true, could only mean basic control of the whole 9/11 scam by the zionists. It cannot be accidental and in fact, often times, a zionist leadership appears to be the most likely possibility.
Of course, there is still the chance that other entities, say the CIA, might be using jewish-zionist movements as a coverup.
Although this seems to be contradicted by the geo-strategical history of the last decade, considering how all the great changes subsequent to 9/11 worked in the direction of a stronger Israel, much more than they worked in the direction of a stronger USA, to the point that becomes at times even hard to imagine an alliance between the "west" and israel, and one must admit that the role of Bush and his crowelians peons must have been in support to the instances of Israel, rather than in support of a geopolitical vision of their own (what vision would that be?)
But who knows? A lot is yet to be discovered. Maybe all the parts involved think they are "using" the other parts to their ends. Personally I feel still far from grasping the whole scenario.
*Update: I decided to try to search around for the video I'm referring to and found this re-upload from Ozzybinoswald..but its all grainy and with no sound and has about 2 minutes of BS before getting to the actual video:
http://www.livevideo.com/video/4E7E1E2E ... -shun.aspx