The MOON HOAX

[hollycrap]

I was able to complete the Lanzarote panorama.

[reel.deal]

I was able to complete the Lanzarote panorama.

thanks hollycrap. very good of you to get in yr spaceship, fly to Mars, and photograph
the missing 76 photos to make the HiRISE photo-montage complete... at last !

[reel.deal]

http://www.cornucopia3d.com/purchase.php?item_id=8178
http://www.nbb.cornell.edu/neurobio/lan ... c/doc.html
http://cjain.free.fr/enpage.php
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 5298000620


Above:This piece is called “Paprika Mars”, which was made out of 12 pounds paprika, cinnamon, nutmeg, amongst other materials.

ref => http://www.designsoak.com/miniature-lan ... -albanese/

William Blake - Auguries of Innocence

To see a world in a grain of sand,
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Photograph 'Mars' in the palm of your hand,
using macro-lens, paprika, & false colour.


http://www.artofeurope.com/blake/bla3.htm

You are talking about fractals? Images from mars are rendered using fractal technology.

INTERLUDE.

and now, time for some pretty pictures of crystals taken through x50 magnify microscopic macro-lenses.
er, i mean... heres some HI-RES HiRISE PHOTOGRAPHS OF MARS !

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiRISE
High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment is a camera on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The 65 kg (143 lb), $40 million (USD) instrument was built under the direction of the University of Arizona's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory by Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. It consists of a 0.5 m (19.7 in) aperture reflecting telescope, the largest so far of any deep space mission, which allows it to take pictures of Mars with resolutions of 0.3 m/pixel (about 1 foot), resolving objects below a meter across.

By 2010, HiRISE had sampled about one percent of the Martian surface at this quality.[1] HiRISE has imaged Mars landers on the surface, including the ongoing Opportunity rover.[2] Its pictures cover many square miles of area yet resolve details as small as desk. [2] It can provide color pictures at this resolution, as well as 3D terrain maps.


http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/1 ... capes.html

...talking about fractals? Images from mars are rendered using fractal technology.

Life on Venus? (and other planetary musings)
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... &p=2364724

Trip to 'Mars', anyone ?

[hollycrap]

We are wandering away from the Moon hoax. The Mars hoax deserves a thread of its own

Apollo 12:

Will somebody turn off the spotlight? It's late at night and neighbors are sleeping



AS12-46-6739



What the guy calls "the Pyramid" in the video below is better known as the North Massive, a supposed mountain in several pictures of the Apollo 17 scam.



full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXvphh2jxE4

The same one that was used as background for multiple scenes, shown below



... And here once more in the hippety hoppety piece of clownery


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJJqDoPHT_c


And once again



And so on ..

[hollycrap]

This is official photograph of Apollo 17, the last mission to the Moon displaying a very big rover for the such a small compartment (The same can be said about the astroNOT with respect to the LM) --- If that is not the exact compartment then it is on the other side

"To be perfectly honest, I’m not really sure why we have to pack the damn rover. There is no real compelling reason to take it to the Moon … except for the fact that they make for good TV, and that seems to be of paramount importance. And as can be seen below, it should easily fit into our spaceship."


http://davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo2.html

That's indeed a gigantic rover !!!!

I found another source for the image at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-14-2.html



Caption:

Field camps on the Moon created by the last three LMs were provisioned with oxygen, water, food, and power for about 70 hours plus some reserves. The Rover had battery power sufficient for about 55 miles, although 22 miles was the most that one was driven. Here Gene Cernan prepares the Rover for our second day of work on Apollo 17.

[hollycrap]

The incredible mystery of the growing mountains and the shapeshifting lunar module on the Moon

[reel.deal]

Thats just the extreme foreshortening effect of the massive telephoto zoom lens they used; attached to the Hasselblads.
oh wait. no they never !
what zoom lens ?

[hollycrap]

Probably the Space Spider was still landing!

[reel.deal]

OMG !!! for NA$A; this is a catasstrophy...

[hollycrap]

Example of first generation second generation and our generation, photos of the moon bogosity. A lot of tampering, embellishment, additional features, and coloring have been introduced during the (almost) half of a century evolution of the scam



Notice original images were almost sepia (as they should).

Also notice in this particular image there are no reticules (from the Haselblad cameras) visible.

Note could not find the AS number but the sites I took them from all concur it's attributed to Apollo 15.

[lux]

Toys in space:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obd_jTO66-0

"We're on our way, Houston!"

Shouldn't we hear the blast-off since we can hear his voice? Also notice his voice does not waver at all yet he is supposedly being blasted off the moon into space. Is there no inertia on the moon?

[hollycrap]

ANd who is panning the camera if they were not in a studio.



Of course I think in this scene, the LM is a scale model a little bigger than a matchbox

It looks like a teapot



http://www.apollo.mem-tek.com/LRO_NAC_A ... mages.html

[hollycrap]

NASA in serious trouble.

After examining further these images I came to understand they are the same montage, (probably with dolls and scales models) with different backdrops but the Lunar module is exactly the same. The problem is that one is attributed to APOLLO 17 AND THE OTHER TO APOLLO 15



Caption

Apollo 15 Lunar Module pilot James B. Irwin loads-up the "Rover", Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) with tools and equipment in preparation for the first lunar extravehicular activity (EVA-1) at the Hadley-Apennine landing site. A portion of the Lunar Module (LM) "Falcon" is on the left. The undeployed Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector (LR-3) lies atop the LM's Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA). This view is looking slightly West of South. Hadley Delta and the Apennine Front are in the background to the left. St. George crater is approximately 5 kilometers (about 3 statute miles) in the distance behind Irwin's head. Photographer: NASA / David R. Scott

REF => http://americanphotoarchive.photoshelte ... jJvXoqwyOY



Caption:

Field camps on the Moon created by the last three LMs were provisioned with oxygen, water, food, and power for about 70 hours plus some reserves. The Rover had battery power sufficient for about 55 miles, although 22 miles was the most that one was driven. Here Gene Cernan prepares the Rover for our second day of work on Apollo 17.

REF = > http://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-14-2.html

[Dcopymope]

Not to be rude, but I think you've seen too many movies of aliens. If you believe that NASA faked the pictures of the moon, how can you believe that NASA has not faked images of Mars? This forum is for investigating interesting things about media fakery, not to mention mythical characters or aliens.

For example, you could start investigating fake pictures like the ones you posted:
http://gizadeathstar.com/2011/12/mars-m ... s-part-ii/

Exactly right, and I already discussed in great depth the effects that movies have on the public psyche in the thread titled 'Social Engineering', and in regards to this topic, specifically pieces of propaganda like this:

Mission to Mars - Ending:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvISV0wGusU

This crap has been promoted by the system in general as if its real history for some time now, and the propaganda campaign has recently intensified ten fold. Mr. Quaid's reply to me is just a product of his conditioning, and by him being here seeing all this info about media fakery, is also a prime example of cognitive dissonance, as you pointed out. He really wants to be believe in this garbage.

[hollycrap]

In the Apollo 17 lift off scene:





1) We can see that in the top part, the object that seems to fly away is an animation from the sixties.
2) The montage bears very little resemblance to the model of the LM in other official photographs
4) the backdrop is not the same as the below illustration shows, with the same face facing forward.
5) There seems to be a problem with the positioning of the legs of that comptraction
6) And last but not leastest, What are they expecting to find when they "get back" if the descent module got blown to smithereens?