If NASA faked the moon landings, does the agency have any credibility at all? Was the Space Shuttle program also a hoax? Is the International Space Station another one? Do not dismiss these hypotheses offhand. Check out our wider NASA research and make up your own mind about it all.
so yeah, maybe its just a crass non-NA$A PhotoShop job to make a 'nice wallpaper'...
would be great to see it on a NA$A site tho, i'm sure they'd love to include it !
Its 2009 and...
Armadillo Aerospace Corp. flew a vehicle named Scorpius on two, three-minute flights between
launch and landing pads 60 meters apart on Saturday, Sept. 12, successfully completing a
level 2 flight profile for the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge (LLC).
If that can do a small 500 lbf rocket, imagine what can do THIS to concrete -
what can do a 9982 lbf LEM engine to the fine Moon regolite dust?! No crater?
You gotta be kidding me!
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaXW5TaFwAE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaXW5TaFwAE
Masten Space VTVL rocket vehicle lifting off from one pad, hovering for 90 seconds
and landing on a second pad 60 meters away, at the Mojave Spaceport in Mojave, CA.
This is flight one for the Northrup Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge.
and let the preppy NA$A REPS spend half an hour showing & demonstrating to you EXACTLY WHY NA$A HAS NEVER SENT ANY SPACEMANS TO THE MOON - EVER - AT ALL !!!
only in America, could a company like NA$A commission a full half hour TV program THAT CONCLUDES AFTER FULLY EXAMINING ALL THE EVIDENCE THAT COSMIC RADIATION WILL MICROWAVE ANY & ALL
SPACEMANS NA$A SENDS BEYOND THE 400 MILE LOWER EARTH ATMOSPHERE WHERE THE VAN ALLEN BELTS BEGIN.
ABSOLUTE GENIUS !!!
Destination Tomorrow 25.
Best ever NA$A Documentary. classic !
Tufa wrote:To hollycrap; remember that the most important parts are those that you can't see. The moon-lander's engine is reported (2000 Percy- What Happened on the Moon) to output dense thick orange smoke; so the set-up is ridiculous, as you world see absolutely nothing but smoke. Backdrop and shadows don't really support a thought of genuine unaltered photography.
lux wrote:I wonder if the Saturn rockets themselves were even real, that is, if they were everything we were told they were.
Dear Lux - here's the first (unmanned) Saturn V rocket... your thoughts?
APOLLO 4 - LAUNCHED BY WALTER CRONKITE
These are the historical TV images of the launch of Apollo 4 - reportedly the first (unmanned) Saturn V rocket which paved the way for NASA's quest for the Moon. The excited TV anchor heard screaming his bowels out is none other than America's sweetheart Walter Cronkite. The date is 11/9, 1967:
This reminds me of many of the nuke test photos. A hodgepodge of fuzzy, hazy, nebulous shapes that suggest something but don't really show much of anything. And, that old faker, Cronkite, filling in what the images don't show, bellowing about the sounds and vibrations ... "The building is shaking! The building is shaking!"
The scale model launch video I posted earlier looks more like the real thing than this! This looks like pure NASA bullshit to me!
hollycrap wrote:Thanks Kentrailer, not half a bad idea
I would love to help you with this film... I know how to make any of the scenes you need, (I can make the Earth rising over the Moon at
correct size look awesome) I can edit the video and make it work.. (We will probably need something better than moviemaker, which I currently have been using) with Flash .
I think we could create an amazing open-source film about the moon hoax- give credit where credit is due (cluesforum) and post links in entirety on this thread here on cluesforum documenting every step. In less than a year, we could have a world class documentary that would really blow people away... Who's in?!
hollycrap wrote:Thanks Kentrailer, not half a bad idea
I would love to help you with this film... I know how to make any of the scenes you need, (I can make the Earth rising over the Moon at
correct size look awesome) I can edit the video and make it work.. (We will probably need something better than moviemaker, which I currently have been using) with Flash .
I think we could create an amazing open-source film about the moon hoax- give credit where credit is due (cluesforum) and post links in entirety on this thread here on cluesforum documenting every step. In less than a year, we could have a world class documentary that would really blow people away... Who's in?!
Reel, I remember seeing that image some time ago. The first thing that I noticed was that the strange machine was an overlay. However I didn't get the nut in the shadow
hollycrap wrote:Reel, I remember seeing that image some time ago. The first thing that I noticed was that the strange machine was an overlay
Ah, that device is claimed to be the A16 Lunar Observatory. It is credited by some as being the source of the most vindicating evidence in support of the reality of the Apollo mission, with super-detailed non-visual spectrum imagery of the universe. I only read about this yesterday, but a supporter of the Official Story bravely asserts via the use of Galaxia (?) on a YouTube apologetica how the astronomical constellations so photographed can only have been originated from the moon's surface. Apparently...
So now let's debunk the debunk...and why does it look like a Da Vinci brass musical organ?
When i went to the Moon ~ with Apollo, i was dressed up as Batman when i took this photo of a spaceman reading a porn comic, and another spaceman playing golf. Tragically, the 3 of us forgot that you cant have 3 spacemans on the Moon together; we forgot to leave 1 of us flying the Command Module Orbiter to
pick us up, dock with the LEM, so we all died. The End.
Despite the success of me dressed as Batman taking photos of 2 spacemans reading porn &
playing golf on the Moon, NA$A made me go back to the Moon AGAIN, because i messed up
the photos. cheek !
They said this time you cant all die though, so only have 2 spacemans on the Moon and
leave 1 spaceman piloting the Command Module, this time.
So NA$A builded us a brand new multi-Billion dollar$ spaceship out of carboard boxes,
because its lighter than the lead spaceships that stop spacemans getting microwaved
by the lethal cosmic radiation beyond Lower Earth Atmosphere in the Van Allen Belts.
Anyways, when we got the Moon, i said "you guys go read porn, play golf, & go-karting
on the Moon, and i'll pilot the Command Module in Lunar Orbit, then i'll pick you up
in a couple days" Unfortunately... as the photos show; it rained on the Moon; and the
Lunar Module 'malfunctioned' due to the cardboard chassis disintegrating and turning
into a soggy papier-mache mulch. So then they died, again. Kaput. Gone. The End.
Unfortunately the image can't be found in any of the thousands of sites promoting the scam by NASA.
In this vintage photograph the batman looks more like the cameraman (crouching in tennis shoes)
BTW what I can make out of the code of this photo is more like S72-24513
No wonder why they blackened the photo out. There are two light sources, better known as spotlights, one from the rear right and one reflecting on the front nut's visor ...