THE NUKE HOAX
Re: Nuke Hoax
The first one is unknown airburst (aprox 1956). The second one is airburst of RDS-3 (42kt, 18.10.1951), the last one is RDS-2 (38kt, 14.09.1954).
-
nonhocapito
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Nuke Hoax
Some of them from Russian TV, some from other films which has been declassified. Many of them has been posted in sonicbomb.com
The Soviet Union recorded every explosion which made. Something is declassified but many photos and videos is classified in today (Top secret).
The Soviet Union recorded every explosion which made. Something is declassified but many photos and videos is classified in today (Top secret).
Re: Nuke Hoax


cant find the link. oh well. anyways; its when...

RVSSIA NUKED CHECHNYA - 17/6/07 @ 08:16 AM.
or something...
Explosive prank could spell fine or even prison for members of artistic group
http://incentraleurope.radio.cz/ice/article/99258
Hoax nuke blast seen on TV weather
http://www.puppiesandflowers.com/?p=610
Czech artists cleared over atomic TV stunt
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/mar/26/television2
Jemima Kiss
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 26 March 2008 14.35 GMT
Ztohoven broadcast
Ztohoven: the Czech art collective faked a nuclear blast. Photograph: ztohoven.com
Seven Czech artists who faked a nuclear explosion in a stunt broadcast live on national television were
acquitted yesterday of spreading false information, escaping a potential prison term of up to three years.
The Ztohoven group of young artists admitted hacking into a live panoramic broadcast of the Krkonose
Mountains in the north of the country on June 17 last year, after climbing a television tower to attach
a computer.
Viewers watching the public broadcaster Czech Television saw a bright flash of light followed by an
ominous mushroom cloud in the distance.
A county court in Trutnov ruled yesterday that the stunt "was not a criminal act", according to Czech
news station CT24, although Czech television said it was "inadvisable and could have provoked panic
among a wide group of people".
Some viewers phoned the broadcaster following the stunt concerned about impending war, while others
asked if there had been a gas explosion.
Ztohoven, which recently won the NG333 award for young artists from Prague's National Gallery, said it
does not have terrorist or political objectives and did not want to "intimidate or manipulate society".
Its Media Reality project aimed to encourage people to think about how our perception of reality is
shaped and manipulated by the media, and question the material that is presented to them.
"It drew attention to the possibility of using images of the world created by the media in place of the
existing, real world," said a statement by the Ztohoven group on its MySpace profile page.
"We believe that even the free space of a public service broadcaster is able to endure such action
and such impeachment. We hope our action will become an appeal for the future and remind the
media of their duty to bring out the truth."
Re: Nuke Hoax
A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by Isao Hashimoto
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&featu ... LCF7vPanrY
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&featu ... LCF7vPanrY
Re: Nuke Hoax
Great find & vid reel.deal.
Re: Nuke Hoax
News report that a nuclear sub was severely damaged by fire:
http://articles.philly.com/2012-05-25/n ... ive-damage
Mattresses? Napkins? Tooth picks?
I mean they don't make subs out of wood, do they ... ?
Could it have been ... uh ... diesel fuel maybe?
http://articles.philly.com/2012-05-25/n ... ive-damage
The sub's nuclear system was unaffected, the story says:A defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va., public policy think tank, said the duration of the fire "suggests extensive damage that could render the vessel useless."
"These submarines were designed decades ago. So they're no longer state of the art," analyst Loren Thompson said. "If this vessel returns to service, I will be amazed."
So, what, other than "nuclear fuel" (which was said to be unaffected), would there be on board a "nuclear sub" that would burn so severely to cause damage that would render the sub a total loss?Firefighters isolated the flames so they would not spread to nuclear propulsion spaces at the rear of the submarine.
There was nuclear fuel on board the sub, but the reactor has been shut down for two months and was unaffected.
Mattresses? Napkins? Tooth picks?
I mean they don't make subs out of wood, do they ... ?
Could it have been ... uh ... diesel fuel maybe?
Re: Nuke Hoax
Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test 1955
Loomis Dean—Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images
Caption from the May 16, 1955, issue of LIFE. "Scorched, male mannequin
in suit of dark fabric indicates a human would be burned but alive."
"Unburned, a lady mannequin with wig askew is wearing light-colored dress which absorbs less heat."
http://life.time.com/history/atomic-tes ... -viewagn#1

Loomis Dean—Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images
Caption from the May 16, 1955, issue of LIFE. "Scorched, male mannequin
in suit of dark fabric indicates a human would be burned but alive."
"Unburned, a lady mannequin with wig askew is wearing light-colored dress which absorbs less heat."
http://life.time.com/history/atomic-tes ... -viewagn#1
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7350
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: Nuke Hoax
*
You've gotta admit that A-bomb damage is pretty scaaaary stuff!

I wonder how many bomb shelters were sold back in the 50's on the strenght of these stupid images...
You've gotta admit that A-bomb damage is pretty scaaaary stuff!

I wonder how many bomb shelters were sold back in the 50's on the strenght of these stupid images...
Re: Nuke Hoax

I see "Father Michael Judge" was there too!!
Re: Nuke Hoax
Those photos couldn't have been taken after a nuclear blast, since we have been taught that such a blast renders an area uninhabitable for centuries. Silly images.
-
Farcevalue
- Member
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:21 am
Re: Nuke Hoax
simonshack wrote:*
You've gotta admit that A-bomb damage is pretty scaaaary stuff!![]()
![]()
I wonder how many bomb shelters were sold back in the 50's on the strenght of these stupid images...
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8otNjS4ePQQ
Re: Nuke Hoax
reel.deal wrote:Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test 1955
![]()
![]()
Loomis Dean—Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images
Caption from the May 16, 1955, issue of LIFE. "Scorched, male mannequin
in suit of dark fabric indicates a human would be burned but alive."
"Unburned, a lady mannequin with wig askew is wearing light-colored dress which absorbs less heat."![]()
![]()
![]()
http://life.time.com/history/atomic-tes ... -viewagn#1![]()
![]()
![]()
Ooh yeah, they drop wrecking crews on ya that come and trash your house... & look like this:simonshack wrote:*
You've gotta admit that A-bomb damage is pretty scaaaary stuff!![]()
![]()
@ http://www.noupe.com/inspiration/50-stu ... works.html
-
Farcevalue
- Member
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:21 am
Re: Nuke Hoax
Does the pronunciation of "nookular" for nuclear make anyone else here crazy? Ever since Dubya, I hear this all the time. It's like America's redneck version of Castillean Spanish for that word.


