9/11 SIMCITY

[simonshack]

*
WHAAAT?

The soapy "Caroline Dries" clip

Watch this video clip (aired by the History Channel )- and enjoy the guy going "WHAAAT?" - at 2:14


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksYBQZ_jqFY

Allow me some irony - and suggest that the reason why the guy is going "WHAAT?" has to do with the absurd digital scenery he's watching...




******************************************************




Today I found this other image, an apparent high-resolution photograph (linked to a now defunct webpage on the canoe.ca website):


http://www.google.it/imgres?start=300&h ... x=66&ty=88

Compare it to the below frame extracted from the "WHAAT" video - and have fun attempting to reconcile the given skyline/buildings/perspectives of the 2 images. I am sorry I won't help you out here - with arrows and circles. It is now UP TO YOU, THE READER OF THIS FORUM, to try and make some sense of this - if you can! The problems here are just too many for me to spell them out. And it should be more fun for you to find them for yourself!


***********************************************************************************

Now, and on a more technical note, please notice that on that History Channel clip, we often see the stripes of that foreground building flickering. To be sure, ONLY THE CENTRAL STRIPES of that building are seen flickering - NOT THE ENTIRE VIDEO FRAME, ok? What do you think is going on here - any idea?




Well - we can only speculate here as to the reasons for this building - and this building ONLY - to flicker in such manner. We would have to ask the makers of this digital imaging software what sort of bug this is. In any case, anyone familiar with this longstanding research should easily be able to recognize this proprietary software bug afflicting the now comprehensively busted 9/11 FAKERY CREW's piss-poor CGI productions.

And to anyone still wondering: "ARE ALL OF THE ABOVE IMAGES FAKE?" My most decisive answer (on the strength of many years of 9/11 imagery analyses) would be: Yes. We just do not have any REAL images of what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. How they managed to sell us ONLY fake imagery of that morning is expounded here: http://septemberclues.org/visual_control.htm

NOTE: Both the video and the still image featured here are by anonymous authors - to my knowledge. I have tried - but not been able to trace anyone credited with these images. I tried to ask the YT user "911TRUTHINATOR" about it - but he has blocked me from his YT channel. If anyone is able to find out if these images are credited to anyone, please let me know.

[nonhocapito]

What an atrocious video, Simon! And of course with falling people... and of course no exact information is given as to where these people were located and who they were...
Just for reference, this is more or less the same view from Google Earth:



the location could be an apartment in a high-rise at 200 Water street. Wonder where this video has been sitting all this time. If you film it, it means you wanna show it to people, right?

As to the picture, I could not make any reasonable location for it. It is possibly meant to be taken with a tele all the way from Brooklyn Heights, but everything in it seems to be off...

EDIT: the picture "from Brooklyn" appears to be credited to one "Spencer Platt", for Getty Images (of course...):


From http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/05/21 ... -theorist/

"Spencer Platt" is of course supposed to be another one of those war photojournalists specialized in the middle east that hung out in NYC that day...

He was awarded for making this picture:


“Young Lebanese Driving Through Devastated Neighborhood of South Beirut“, 2006 From http://www.flickr.com/photos/gunthert/2 ... /lightbox/

A credible, totally-not-staged picture, no? Here's the author in front of it:


From http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soubor:Spe ... ograph.jpg

[Equinox]

*


NOTE: Both the video and the still image featured here are by anonymous authors - to my knowledge. I have tried - but not been able to trace anyone credited with these images. I tried to ask the YT user "911TRUTHINATOR" about it - but he has blocked me from his YT channel. If anyone is able to find out if these images are credited to anyone, please let me know.

Sure thing Simon,
Caroline Dries---




Caroline Dries is supposed to be filming from her NYU dorm at 200 Water Street.



Caroline's footage premiered on History's "102 Minutes that Changed America" in 2008, but only the plane crash explosion.

CNN found Caroline 10 years after her NYU dorm room experience. The WTC 1 collapse also was captured, minus the initiation.

Full video here buddy……

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/201 ... l-9-11.cnn

How fake is the shot of the collapse shot, they are all supposed to be dorm students so after running terrified down stairs they all return to the room and start “chugging beers”. Coz they are all beer drinking college dorm student right??.... lame

Bad acting---


Notice how flat the beers are because they have been rehearsing that over and over and over and over....... over and over and over and over.......




Edit--Simon, If you or anyone here... needs to Identify 9/11 footage don't hesitate to ask.

[simonshack]

*
Thanks Nonho and Equinox,

Well, isn't it swell that young 2001 student Caroline Dries has landed a juicy job as a "successful Hollywood producer"?

And - appropriately enough - the woman is into blood-sucking...

http://www.hypable.com/2012/01/19/vampi ... s-episode/

CAROLINE DRIES on Wackopedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Dries
"Caroline Dries is an American television writer and producer who has worked as a writer on three series for The CW; Smallville, Melrose Place and is currently serving as an executive producer on The Vampire Diaries. She is also known for the footage she captured of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on NYC."

And once again, these new "ten-years-after 9/11 videos" appear to have forgotten how much the rooftop of WTC2 was supposed to be leaning during its initial seconds of collapse...


Older image credited to Norwegian VG photoreporter Thomas Nilsson:


And dear reel deal, I have posted another "jumpers" analysis over at the "FALLING MAN" thread - comparing two frames extracted from the Caroline Dries' "video":

[discomatty]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICttg7xPNBA

This is supposed to be a video about personal training, but @ the :04, :16, and :50 second marks, I keep getting those ugly 9/11 looking glitches when I do overlays. For the longest time, I couldn't understand this part of the research, until I had the same issues with this video. I might as well call this 9/11 Two-Let's Get Physical.

[brianv]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICttg7xPNBA

This is supposed to be a video about personal training, but @ the :04, :16, and :50 second marks, I keep getting those ugly 9/11 looking glitches when I do overlays. For the longest time, I couldn't understand this part of the research, until I had the same issues with this video. I might as well call this 9/11 Two-Let's Get Physical.

I ain't an expert but I had some fairly decent overlay results using VirtualDub and Avisynth. I don't know if they would cut it professionaly but you could try it!

[michael]

I actually do not know how to show swf and gif's, it'd be nice if any moderator makes this swf visible: https://853291088992288294-a-1802744773 ... edirects=0

Sorry about that messy link, but please click to the FIRST link and watch it to the end, just 20 seconds.

It's a comparison between ABC live shot and one amateur video, there's no copter on ABC, because it's FAKE.

And amateur video could be a real shot of explosion, since the missile can not be seen because of camera sight.

***************************************
Here's a quicker link to it...Great job, Michael! (upload on septclues.com courtesy of Simon)
http://www.septclues.com/ANIMATED%20GIF ... noheli.swf

[Brutal Metal]

I like ^ this footage AND REALLY what are the chances of some random college girl who Happened to shoot a video on 911 ending up a Hollywood Producer? Are you aware the number of Mass Comm degrees dispersed in this country yearly? I got one of em in 89

[Equinox]

This shadow is possible, because the only source of light for this fireman is reflection of the sun on the buildings and yes- you can have the shadow in the shadow-go on the street and check it out. Same shadow has the man crossing the road. There is no sign of the green screen.

Pawelos,

I think it is highly doubtful that the building would bounce off enough light to make these crisp leg shadows - in a shaded area.
But we could always travel to NYC (Lispenard St / Church St intersection) this coming September to see if this is possible.



Here are two Google Earth images - just for a wider view of the intersection:


Does this person have a shadow - in her shaded area? ( "X" is the location of the fireman in the Naudet video)

9-11 WTC Attacks Original Sound. Steve Vigilante

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwKQXsXJDX4

Quote:
“Some footage I shot on 9-11-01. This is never before seen footage and has never been released. I chose to upload it because I feel it has historical importance.”
Here is a Shot from the video.

Released 2010-
Here is a Shot from the video.




911 WTC Naudet first strike full

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBphzj7h9J8

2001--- Naudet first strike.

Quote:
The red-versus-white discrepancies observed above cannot be ascribed to any chromatic distortion or white-balance issues

I believe a little while back reel deal And I worked out the truck is in the same spot but everything is thrown out of perpspective. That was correct reel?

[pov603]

Can someone living near Manhattan go to this location in the coming early Sep' 2012 and take a photo from the same vantage as Naudet did and see if someone crossing the street casts a shadow going the wrong way?

It may need a few tries on different days with cloud cover etc but may be worth the 'experiment' to see what transpires.

[SmokingGunII]

No need, Pov. It can't happen in the real world. Like I've said before, watch the guy crossing the road in the Naudet video. He doesn't look up once, which is strange when you think there should be a 737 reaming it's way over his head at less than a 1000 feet high!

[Equinox]

No need, Pov. It can't happen in the real world. Like I've said before, watch the guy crossing the road in the Naudet video. He doesn't look up once, which is strange when you think there should be a 737 reaming it's way over his head at less than a 1000 feet high!

Smokey, Thats a very smart answer and very spot on.
Simon made a REALISTIC epic audio /video of what a real plane top speed into a sky scraper would sound like...
Turn the speakers up..
http://blip.tv/september-clues/fly-over ... ng-2520214

Also what the plane would at least closely look like to....


Hey smokey you and I, have both tried to record a plane flying over head just by glancing up. It's impossible with out shaking and losing sight of it.. check it out.... And the plane looks real because it is real. The soundtrack is more louder than the naudet video and was flying twice as high and also the engines only revving on half the speed 240 mph.
Speakers up

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVNgZwFVzdQ

[Equinox]

Simon, I am not sure this particular part of synched out was added to the movie by you ( because I cannot seem to see it on any others.) Or if someone else has added it to your video.


But It got me thinking about this shot...



And after a few days researching it. You are 100% correct about the background NOT appearing in the CNN shot.
I have verified all views and compared the closest I can find using angles in real life and using to scale 3D land scape.

The background from across the Hudson River SHOULD be there.






Extra Extra read all about it!!!!...
CNN busted with pre-fabricated fake news… Yankees win ballgame…

[Q_prime]

Can someone living near Manhattan go to this location in the coming early Sep' 2012 and take a photo from the same vantage as Naudet did and see if someone crossing the street casts a shadow going the wrong way?

It may need a few tries on different days with cloud cover etc but may be worth the 'experiment' to see what transpires.

Just looking at the picture, something is not right. The upper part of beige building on the right side. On the baackground the white building and light brown build look artificial, numbers of windows gave away a composite production. Is it me or I have a strange impression that place is not New York but an outside replica?

[Equinox]

Unique, rare 9/11 material shot from the Hudson

This movie supposed to be from a boat... I will offer some analysis on it shortly.

Great find, Equinox.

Here we can clearly see how those fat/black, contour outlines (often seen in the horrid 9/11 imagery) actually interact with the other animated layers (in this case, the rising smoke). To be sure, this simply cannot occur in the domain of real photography - but only in digital composites:




If you wonder what I'm asking you to look at, here I've added a few arrows to help your eyes focus on the problem: as the smoke rises up behind the World Financial Center building, it appears to "erase" that ugly black edge !



Those black edges may seem unimportant to the layman - but they are extremely useful to determine the digital nature of the 9/11 imagery.

I rest my case: ALL (yes, ALL) the existing 9/11 images of the WTC collapses are digital creations.

Those black edges may seem unimportant to the layman - but they are extremely useful to determine the digital nature of the 9/11 imagery.

We have well spotted these grubby black lines as masking edges.

Great find to you as well Simon Here are couple of GIFs I whipped up with a style I used to spot and prove the masking lines.. I got the best shots I could get of the black edges and using a couple of styles including one I stumbled across funnily enough called "edge detection"



The 9/11 imagry is so fake...Its really...

"lost its edge!"