fbenario wrote:QuoVadis wrote:Equinox
Methinks Ugo_da_Lugo saw your 'chop-shop' post as rather humorous with
no sarcasm in it and surely no
'attitude' either.
As for the posts regarding your recent 'groundbreaking' research that would supposedly exceed the boundaries of these puny little 9/11 truth forums? I say its time for you to go back to the drawing board. The posting is not designed very well inasmuch as the reader/viewer is befuddled and discombobulated right from the start - after the first few lines even, and especially after viewing the first few images.
As for Phil Jayhan........the road to Hell is paved with the likes of such as he.
I have watched the awful goings on there at Jayhan's forums (as a lurker) for some time now without ever having joined. I am also a (member) but still a lurker here as well, but just had to respond to your comments regarding this character to help set the record straight.
He is no friend of Simon Shack and all one need do is to peruse the site for ten minutes to find out how he truly feels.
In his postings and especially in his secluded Private Chat (and also a Super Private hidden chat for special members only on a level below the regular chat and so not seen by regular members) he constantly trashes Mr Simon Shack and HP with vile and filthy language at every opportunity, and you have to know that
Equinox because you are one of the most devoted of followers of the
Jayhan Cult. I am told these things by certain 'insiders' and I have the "text" of it all in my possession for my own reasons which shall be forthcoming soon enough. [This sounds like a barely-veiled blackmail threat. Don't ever do it again.]
So LetsRoll is only to be understood as a bona fide
CULT and he's its
Guru leader and in many ways he's no different than any other guru type whose slavish adherents will bow to the program in very much the same manner as they would Marshall Applewhite of Heavens Gate notoriety, or David Koresh, or any other such mind controller.
Did you consider that calling out and putting down one of our respected ongoing contributors might not be perceived by the forum as especially friendly on your part? Since you say you're familiar with this forum's contents, then you already know we don't take kindly to claims of "inside, hidden knowledge/awareness". What gives?
Yes Im like wtf? I don't even care about that website..
When we fight about 9/11 we let the terrorists win.
The way I see it, the above quoted paragraph is complete bullshit. Jayhan has banned every mention of september clues and the cluesforum, he has retroactively altered threads removing any mention and link back to us and has trashed and insulted Simon personally and our work in general.
You are talking about that rant Phil seem to have stated August last year,
http://letsrollforums.com/september-clu ... mber+clues
Well Simon and I have posted stuff in their that past couple of months and weeks… Also with the September clues Logo.
http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php? ... tcount=366
thats all no biggie.
and you have to know that Equinox because you are one of the most devoted of followers of the Jayhan Cult. I am told these things by certain 'insiders' and I have the "text" of it all in my possession for my own reasons which shall be forthcoming soon enough.
Total BS.. I personally find the dude creeps me out. I dont even go on there anymore.
I feel quite offended really. Yup we all know Phil’s a douche… don’t ever say Im some big follower of his because is simply is not true. You have just totally bagged ME out. and “lets roll” and yet trust “insiders” from there more than me someone who genially trying to help boost the research?
As of since 2010 I even had Simons trust of copying his posts and pasting his posts word for word on there. (With out quoting) And he said I was doing a good job as well see?
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 0#p2351940 (half way down see simons post)
--- we talk almost daily dude. If he has an issue with about any my work 100% no doubt he would deal with it. There is no dramas.
I have the "text" of it all in my possession
Nope--- Out with it, if you reckon, have something lets see it. You should not be secretive…. Good thing is I'm not that.. there is nothing and I know it…
As for the posts regarding your recent 'groundbreaking' research that would supposedly exceed the boundaries of these puny little 9/11 truth forums? I say its time for you to go back to the drawing board. The posting is not designed very well inasmuch as the reader/viewer is befuddled and discombobulated right from the start - after the first few lines even, and especially after viewing the first few images.
That’s because the top half explaining it is not on there!!!!!! The actual post is properly read and fully understood with Simons original pictures and words.
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 5#p2367222
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 5#p2367222
And here where I archived it from the archives!!!
The actual post is
HUGE and did not won’t keep clogging up the forum replying to UGO , with a Massive post when one can look back at the research on the matter in the past few days.
But if you really want it explained in detailed like it is sure-----
simonshack wrote:I sometimes wonder - after almost half-a-decade of analyzing the 9/11 imagery, just why it took such a long time or me (or anyone) to notice the atrocious crassness of it. There are mysteries aplenty in this world, but this particular mystery (why I didn't fully grasp the evident bogusness of the entire pool of 9/11 imagery) has had me scratching my head for a long while. I now realize that this was all part of the 9/11 plotters' plan.
Back in 2007, I made my very first 9/11 imagery analysis:
The Grand TV Illusion. Of course, I wasn't quite content with it: the poor quality video resolution at hand left me wondering if I had pushed too far my interpretation of the given visuals. Perhaps I was just looking at standard video artifacts - caused by digital conversions/compressions?
Luckily, in 2010, the very stupid 9/11 perpetrators decided to release higher-resolution versions of their horrid digital animations. The below HQ frame of this CNN shot is from the
NIST-FOIA batch of imagery released in 2010. (Huh? Have you ever asked yourself why NIST would have been sitting on/archiving this 9/11 image pool ? Wouldn't the TV networks have that material stored in their archives? )
Anyways, the below image was supposedly shot from a "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building... How anyone can still believe these are real/genuine images by a broadcast-quality CNN camera is quite beyond me. Note the
<<<clear masking line>>> around WTC1:
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u88I0jZ8xYo
Here's a frame of the collapse of WTC2 - supposedly from the same "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building". All I have done here is to apply a brightness/contrast filter to highlight the absurd, pitch black cartoon-outlines around the buildings (and other problems):
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKyHn8pxGo
The 2 above images naturally lead to the following simple and logical conclusion:
NOT ONLY WAS THE IMAGERY OF AN AIRPLANE IMPACTING THE WTC SHOWN ON TV a digital animation, ALSO THE WTC COLLAPSES were digital animations.
Original Frame-- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5, Clip 20 (WTC2 Collapse, 9:59am) CNN
Source--- CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKyHn8pxGo
Time--- 0.10 seconds
Original Frame-
A brightness/contrast filter added.
All horizontal/ vertical masking lines/layers now visible.
A zoom in on “WTC1 and 2” And “WTC7”
Highlighted all the masking layers/Lines.
Notice how edge of the “WTC7” roof naturally obscures the “WTC2”
Layers "C" and "D" do actually appear through the WTC-7.
The CNN shot is a fake because-
A)--- It is filled with "horizontal" and "vertical" CGI with masking lines which are clearly visible.
---The vertical masking lines “C” and “D” of WTC-2 appear transparent through what is meant to be an obscured section of façade on “WTC- 7 face.”
Archived---
Originally sourced-- 9/11 TV Archives - CNN Sept. 11, 2001 9.29 am - 10.11 am@ 34.45 Minutes
Re- Released NisT --- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5 20
Originally sourced--- CNN Sept. 11, 2001 8.48 - 9.29am@ 22.08 Minutes
Re- Released--- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5, Clip 15
Sample---
[/quote]
That’s a HUGE post!