Has anyone here looked at library newspaper archives to try to find this?[/quote]burlington wrote:Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
In fact it is one of those puzzling rumors generated early by those official conspiracy theorists... I believe it was expunged from the following version of that movie... it is a completely idiotic and unprovable idea and it isn't worth a minute of our time. There were no planes, hence no passengers to take care of. The rest is deliberate confusion, manipulative, planted contradictions.fbenario wrote:Has anyone here looked at library newspaper archives to try to find this?
It's discussed in the Loose Change limited-hangout-silliness movies.
)So let me get this straight, a plane hits a pelican and the plane is massively damaged and the windshield shatters? On the other hand a plane hits the WTC and it effortlessly pierces the exterior?diagonal2 wrote:Birds completely wrecking a plane...
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Olsp9JcIzn4
It is those small details that escapes people, and to be completely honest... I didn't notice that at first, but now that you've said it, I see the fakery in that animation.Heiwa wrote:I like people like reel.deal using their eyes and brains when observing things at different distances and explaining how things get smaller when getting further away from the observer, etc.