SANDY HOOK: Newtown, CT—“School Shooting”: December 14, 2012

[simonshack]

Too far-fetched?

Not at all, Knapsack.

I have been thinking along those lines too. Let's wait and see. It is good that you typed those thoughts of yours, in case they do release such gory, "realer-then-life" death-imagery in the future. After all, the truckloads of 9/11 "amateur" imagery that we have today trickled out progressively, one after the other, over a decade-long timespan. So, it's not like they haven't thought of that before...

Remember: the sharpest, high-resolution 9/11 images we have ... were 'suddenly' released by NIST in 2010! (allegedly through a FOIA act filed by ABC television network!!! )

Check it out: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p2371825

(And the sharpest MOOOON landing imagery we have was released around 1993!!!)

Don't you think that all these "Johnny-come-lately" images were all meant to "corroborate" the official tales?

[simonshack]

Has Everyone Heard This?

The following is a link to the Guns and Butter program on KPFA with Bonnie Faulkner. In this episode Faulkner interviews Professor James F. Tracy who is an Associate Professor at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton. Tracy's specialization is Media Studies with a focus on media manipulation. In the wake of the Sandy Hook Shooting Incident, Tracy has come under attack for analyzing the coverage of the story and pointing out the anomalies that were expressed through various mediums; in other words he has come under attack for doing his job. 00:57:45: http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/87874

Interesting find, Lazlo.

No wonder Prof James F. Tracy is being 'demonized'... I'll recall this name whenever anyone asks me this frequently asked question:

"Do any professionals/media experts/academics ever step forward to denounce the media fakery discussed at Cluesforum?"

Yeah - well, look at what happens to them!

**********************************

Here's another interesting podcast to listen to. It features our member Euphoria (Martin) from the UK:
How Big of a Hoax was the Sandy Hook “Massacre?”
http://thewhitenetwork.com/2013/01/05/h ... -massacre/

[simonshack]

*

Back to my old, trusty photo-analysis-mode...

Source of below images: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/16/rem ... -shooting/


PLEASE NOTE: I had to flip horizontally the "Daniel Barden" image to highlight the fact that the two backgrounds are 100% identical. Thus, it is NOT an acceptable hypothesis, as one may (fallaciously) argue, that the Sandy Hook school had some 'yellowgreen forest' backdrop against which they photographed their teachers and alumni.


Moreover: the lazy imbeciles who created by digital means the Sandy Hoox VICSIMS seem to have used that same 'yellowgreen forest' screensaver image for the backdrop of as many 4 vicsims. How silly can it get?

"Catherine Hubbard"

"Jack Pinto"

[brianv]

Here's another interesting podcast to listen to. It features our member Euphoria (Martin) from the UK:
How Big of a Hoax was the Sandy Hook “Massacre?”
http://thewhitenetwork.com/2013/01/05/h ... -massacre/

But first up we have a Holocaust Denier

Simon, do you expect to get an answer from Brit in Norway? And are you going to Oslo this year? I know it's expensive, but if I thought you were going to visit "our friend", I could start saving now and meet you there!

[simonshack]

Simon, do you expect to get an answer from Brit in Norway? And are you going to Oslo this year? I know it's expensive, but if I thought you were going to visit "our friend", I could start saving now and meet you there!

Brian! I'm hoping to make it to my homeland this summer -.finances permitting, Yes, of course I expect "our friend" to list the names of the six grieving families. Isn't that what he wrote? That he knows of six grieving families of the Breivik attack? Do Brits lie? In any case, I'd be delighted to meet you in Oslo this summer. Please start saving.

[brianv]

Simon, do you expect to get an answer from Brit in Norway? And are you going to Oslo this year? I know it's expensive, but if I thought you were going to visit "our friend", I could start saving now and meet you there!

Brian! I'm hoping to make it to my homeland this summer -.finances permitting, Yes, of course I expect "our friend" to list the names of the six grieving families. Isn't that what he wrote? That he knows of six grieving families of the Breivik attack? Do Brits lie? In any case, I'd be delighted to meet you in Oslo this summer. Please start saving.

That gives them six-ish months to get rid of Breivik, which is what I meant when I said "our friend". We will be of course asking...nay demanding to be allowed a visit to that strangest of living curiousities.

[Knapsack]

Moreover: the lazy imbeciles who created by digital means the Sandy Hoox VICSIMS seem to have used that same 'yellowgreen forest' screensaver image for the backdrop of as many 4 vicsims. How silly can it get?

This identical background has been pointed out elsewhere, and I have to admit there is a pretty reasonable explanation for it.

These could easily be explained as "school portraits". I'm not sure about other parts of the world, but in U.S. public elementary schools, professional photographers come in and take portraits of each student twice a year--once in the autumn and once in the spring.

Usually these school portraits feature a slate grey or blue background, but I think what we're seeing here is a more "fancy" backdrop which is meant to look like photographic "bokeh," or the out-of-focus area which is desirable in outdoor portrait photography.

The only reservation I have is the one of substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau. It seems unlikely (though not impossible) that she would have had one of these school portraits taken if she was only a substitute teacher.

[Unleashed]

Moreover: the lazy imbeciles who created by digital means the Sandy Hoox VICSIMS seem to have used that same 'yellowgreen forest' screensaver image for the backdrop of as many 4 vicsims. How silly can it get?

This identical background has been pointed out elsewhere, and I have to admit there is a pretty reasonable explanation for it.

These could easily be explained as "school portraits". I'm not sure about other parts of the world, but in U.S. public elementary schools, professional photographers come in and take portraits of each student twice a year--once in the autumn and once in the spring.

Usually these school portraits feature a slate grey or blue background, but I think what we're seeing here is a more "fancy" backdrop which is meant to look like photographic "bokeh," or the out-of-focus area which is desirable in outdoor portrait photography.

The only reservation I have is the one of substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau. It seems unlikely (though not impossible) that she would have had one of these school portraits taken if she was only a substitute teacher.

Her alleged Dad had a portrait studio for 28 years in Southbury so saith the internet. I'd love to know if he was hired.

Also, this has puzzled me. The claim is she was hired as a full time substitute. Well, they have a budget and these sorts of things are ironed out and employees hired BEFORE school even starts.
Not the middle of October. If that were not a stretch in itself, it was further alleged that this was her first day teaching that particular class. She was taking the place of an unnamed teacher who
was supposedly out for maternity leave. A Thurday was her last day? Odd.

In October, Rousseau took a big step forward. She was given a full-time assignment as a "building sub" at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, meaning that she showed up for work every day and filled in where she was needed.

On Dec. 14, she took over a first-grade class for a teacher out on leave.

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut ... 5215.story

[simonshack]

This identical background has been pointed out elsewhere, and I have to admit there is a pretty reasonable explanation for it.

These could easily be explained as "school portraits". I'm not sure about other parts of the world, but in U.S. public elementary schools, professional photographers come in and take portraits of each student twice a year--once in the autumn and once in the spring.

Knapsack,

Please pay attention to what I wrote in red type in my above post.

Here are the ORIGINAL images from the TIME magazine Sandy Hook memorial page:



As you can see, the yellowgreen backdrop of these two images is mirrored. What is your 'pretty reasonable explanation' for that? That someone - for some unfathomable reason - mirrored/flipped horizontally one of the two portraits in photoshop?

*********
Everyone PLEASE spend a little time reading the ridiculous tributes to the supposed Sandy Hook victims here:
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/16/rem ... -shooting/

Three examples:

"Grace McDonnell was a “girly girl” who loved wearing pink and playing dress-up in jewelry, explained her grandmother Mary Ann McDonnell. The 7-year-old adored her pet dog named Puddin’ and enjoyed art projects, soccer and gymnastics. “A little baby like that — I just hope she didn’t suffer,” said her grandmother."


"Josephine Gay had celebrated her seventh birthday just three days before the massacre. She loved the color purple, and to honor her memory, residents in a new subdivision near Sandy Hook Elementary School hung purple balloons on mailboxes and gates, the Wall Street Journal reports."



"Olivia Engel, whose favorite colors were purple and pink, would say grace for the family before dinner every night, reports the New Haven Register. Engel did well in reading and math at school, and she also took classes in art, swimming, ballet and hip-hop. Her favorite toy was a stuffed lamb. “I cannot stop thinking about her beautiful smile, her sweet voice and her infectious laugh,” wrote Julie Guastello Pokrinchak on a Facebook page set up by her family."

[ninetynine]

"infectious laugh"

*rolls eyes*

[Wings]

Wings, please introduce yourself: http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 5#p2379745

Done!

[Sisterlover]

Strange... The SSDI shows many of the 'victims' of Sandy Hook, but contains no entry for Adam Lanza!?

[brianv]

Strange... The SSDI shows many of the 'victims' of Sandy Hook, but contains no entry for Adam Lanza!?

Erm, do children have Social Security numbers now?

[Unleashed]

Strange... The SSDI shows many of the 'victims' of Sandy Hook, but contains no entry for Adam Lanza!?

Erm, do children have Social Security numbers now?

If you want to claim them as a dependent on your income tax, they do.

[Farcevalue]

Too far-fetched?

Not at all, Knapsack.

I have been thinking along those lines too. Let's wait and see. It is good that you typed those thoughts of yours, in case they do release such gory, "realer-then-life" death-imagery in the future. After all, the truckloads of 9/11 "amateur" imagery that we have today trickled out progressively, one after the other, over a decade-long timespan. So, it's not like they haven't thought of that before...

Remember: the sharpest, high-resolution 9/11 images we have ... were 'suddenly' released by NIST in 2010! (allegedly through a FOIA act filed by ABC television network!!! )

Check it out: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p2371825

(And the sharpest MOOOON landing imagery we have was released around 1993!!!)

Don't you think that all these "Johnny-come-lately" images were all meant to "corroborate" the official tales?

I have been thinking along these lines, as well. This one seems almost too easy. I recall a fair amount of suspicion among members here that the perps are monitoring SC for pointers on how to make their psyops more believable. Amongst all the slip-shod reporting, obviously photo-shopped images, poor acting, etc., one of the tidbits that nags at me is the mention of the new school security system. A tour de force release of an impeccable surveillance camera recording documenting the "event" could have a pretty adverse effect on all the new fakery researchers that have come out of the woodwork to challenge this story.

It's all about perception, after all. I have had very little success with encouraging people to source original material and make up their own minds. They much prefer to get their opinions from the talking heads and take sides in the AJ versus Piers Morgan debate. Slickly produced security footage with some studiously composed redaction and pixelation could be a tough hurdle to counter, due the the highly charged emotional content involved.

I can't wait to try to explain this one if it comes out Let's hope they were just sloppy.