THE DERAILING ROOM

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest

Re: Boston Marathon- alLEGed "terror attack"- Apr15, 2013

Unread postby simonshack on Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:06 pm

Oddfellow wrote: As far as the video being removed, I don't know what to tell ya, the article is fairly recent. I found it googling for image stabilized films. I have tried to find the source video elsewhere but am coming up short.


So ... did you even watch that "stabilized version of the Cloverfield" movie yourself, Oddy? If so, WHERE?
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Boston Marathon- alLEGed "terror attack"- Apr15, 2013

Unread postby Oddfellow on Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:18 am

simonshack wrote:
Oddfellow wrote: As far as the video being removed, I don't know what to tell ya, the article is fairly recent. I found it googling for image stabilized films. I have tried to find the source video elsewhere but am coming up short.


So ... did you even watch that "stabilized version of the Cloverfield" movie yourself, Oddy? If so, WHERE?



Sorry I thought I made that clear. I DID watch some of it on the page I linked to originally (maybe 2 minutes worth spread out across the film, enough to verify the artifact was present), at the time the movie was up and the link worked.




********************************
ADMIN NOTICE (simon): Well, Oddfellow, enough already - I think you're full of it and am moving your "stablization argument" over to the derailing room where it belongs.
Oddfellow
Banned
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:58 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread postby ElSushi on Mon Jun 09, 2014 6:23 am

CB, my bad, that's what happens when you try to make sense at a late hour of the night.
For sure, this does require a certain amount of entropy and intuition (right?), thanks for pointing this little irrelevancy Monsieur CB.
ElSushi
Member
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:53 am

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread postby CitronBleu on Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:54 am

EDIT
CitronBleu
Member
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:45 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:35 am

CitronBleu,

Please provide some context or replacement content for your edits. You are disrupting the forum by replacing seemingly random posts with the word "EDIT"!
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5054
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread postby CitronBleu on Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:19 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:CitronBleu,

Please provide some context or replacement content for your edits. You are disrupting the forum by replacing seemingly random posts with the word "EDIT"!

The Edit function is no longer available on older posts.
CitronBleu
Member
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:45 pm

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:15 pm

I see. My bad for not checking up on that. Anyway, you know what I mean.

B)
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5054
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: THE DERAILING ROOM

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Thu Jun 19, 2014 5:16 am

CitronBleu,

You have been temporarily suspended because you have gone back into a large number of your old posts this month and removed them. You posted recently something as useless as a "."

This destroys our forum and it is interpretable as sabotage, even though you have written well here and there.

Sorry if you are legit and we just need to clear this up, but until it is clear exactly what you are doing, we cannot allow it to continue as long as we have a choice in the matter. You also seem to have changed the nature of your posts since you received the FOIA documents and apparently claim to have had a panic attack, then started insisting on different terms for our forum. Please e-mail us to clear up matters so we can unban you as soon as possible. This is an emergency stopgap in case your account has been compromised.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5054
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: NOT GETTING THE WORD OUT!

Unread postby poax a hoax on Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:29 pm

Before i finalise my matrix of interconnected array of media bullshit, has anyone else tried to connect the dots - or at least identified any 'good-guys' >
poax a hoax
Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:50 am

Re: NOT GETTING THE WORD OUT!

Unread postby Moros on Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:37 pm

Difficult to say. A lot of it depends on whether or not this system survives. It if falls, I don't think that we'll ever know. If it manages to go into hyperdrive, then it will become immediately apparent who was "good", and who was "bad", so-to-speak.
Moros
 

Re: NOT GETTING THE WORD OUT!

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:19 pm

poax a hoax wrote:Before i finalise my matrix of interconnected array of media bullshit, has anyone else tried to connect the dots - or at least identified any 'good-guys' >


Fuck this level of incoherency. You are derailing topics now. You need to slow down, read our forum requirements, read the actual forum you are on and figure out what you can do here besides drop text slobber on everything.

Start here: viewforum.php?f=32

Please do not post again until you have processed where you are. Otherwise, start a blog and get out of here.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5054
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: Reviewing Hollywood snakery

Unread postby pov603 on Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:11 am

One thing that has become noticeable over the last few years [and had been intermittently used in the '80s/'90s certainly] is the use of 'Real' newscasters in films where impending doom awaits, or a major 'event' has happened.
The weird thing when watching the film/TV show is the impact this has on the viewer [me, in this instance] with regard to adding to the 'suspension of disbelief' hence buying into the fantasy that the film/TV is trying to portray.
In other words it tends to make the 'story' more believable/enjoyable.
After seeing this happen time and time again, it made me realize [belatedly I will admit] how complicit the newscasters are in that they will only read what is put in front of them.
In Anchorman, this has been demonstrated with the hilarious use of the autocue to try and derail Ron Burgundy's character.
In the same way that the newscasters will repeat [parrot-fashion] endless loops of news broadcast irrespective of whether they believe in, or actually know of, the event they are commenting on shows how this can easily be applied to any 'actor' involved in the '11th Sep 2001' events, especially when the reward [or threat] of money/retainers/future work/life/liberty/limb are used.
I'm not trying to exonerate any of the newscasters but one can see how people advertently become complicit.

Edited 'once'.
Edited 'twice' if I see it...
Last edited by pov603 on Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
pov603
Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: Reviewing Hollywood snakery

Unread postby brianv on Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:41 pm

pov603 wrote:One thing that has become noticeable over the last few years [and had been intermittently used in the '80s/'90s certainly] is the use of 'Real' newscasters in films where impending doom awaits, or a major 'event' has happened.
The weird thing when watching the film/TV show is the impact this has on the viewer [me, in this instance] with regard to adding to the 'suspension of disbelief' hence buying into the fantasy that the film/TV is trying to portray.
In other words it tends to make the 'story' more believable/enjoyable.
After seeing this happen time and time again, it made me realize [belatedly I will admit] how complicit the newscasters are in that they will only read what is put in front of them.
In Anchorman, this has been demonstrated with the hilarious use of the autocue to try and derail Ron Burgundy's character.
In the same way that the newscasters will repeat [parrot-fashion] endless loops of news broadcast irrespective of whether they believe in, or actually know of, the event they are commenting on shows how this can easily be applied to any 'actor' involved in the '11th Sep 2001' events, especially when the reward [or threat] of money/retainers/future work/life/liberty/limb are used.
I'm not trying to exonerate any of the newscasters but once can see how people advertently become complicit.


Why the wacky indentation?
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: Reviewing Hollywood snakery

Unread postby simonshack on Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:06 pm

brianv wrote:
Why the wacky indentation?

Oh Brian - aren't you being a tad too picky here ? :mellow:
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Reviewing Hollywood snakery

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:05 pm

Okay, I'll be picky too, then.

I'm not trying to exonerate any of the newscasters but once can see how people advertently become complicit.


You may have meant to write "one can see" how people "inadvertently" become complicit. Please, people, check your grammar and spelling so our site doesn't read like slop!
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5054
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to THE LIVING ROOM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests