Titanic

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
Critical Mass
Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:33 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Critical Mass »

I've often thought the 9/11 movie would have used scale miniatures for some of the scenes... that certainly would explain why you have 'steel beams' weighing "hundreds of tonnes" being flung around laterally.

They're not steel beams... probably just a bit of tin or something.

A photo from one of my favorite sites...

Image

A 'miniature' used for the 1974 movie THE TOWERING INFERNO
Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1243
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Flabbergasted »

Critical Mass wrote:I've often thought the 9/11 movie would have used scale miniatures for some of the scenes...
I also think "large miniatures" may have been used for the 9/11 movie, even if they were only one of the ingredients in the final mix. It seems like an obvious way of obtaining somewhat realistic effects of fire, explosions and collapses, and "magicians of the miniature" were not hard to come by in the late nineties.
I get the same feeling with some of the rocket launches, especially where flames and billowing smoke are lifelike enough but in completely wrong proportion to the enormous size of the object represented.
Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... W-zIkH6MeI
hoi.polloi
Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by hoi.polloi »

There is a rather curious story that the Olympic got into an accident in September 1911, and therefore it is "speculated" the Titanic narrowly avoided disaster on that day. That month will always be 100 years behind the events of 9/11.

Therefore, this Sunday we will be looking at the 105th anniversary of that "narrow escape of the Titanic" while it was supposedly sailing around, and the 15th anniversary of 9/11. Hmm. :D

Topical episode of The Clues Chronicle out soon ... :)
Haze
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Haze »

There are plenty of news today about a journalist investigation for Titanic Case.
The conclusion is that there was a fire before the journey.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2017/01/ ... -fire.html
hoi.polloi
Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by hoi.polloi »

This is assuming the journey took place.
smj
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:29 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by smj »

the narrative says general sarnoff heroically manned the telegraph machine the night that dastardly iceberg wreaked so much havoc. his actions brought radio (and himself of course) into the spotlight we're told...

"Radio to the Rescue: David Sarnoff and the Titanic Disaster
 
From April 12 through May 11, 2012, a special exhibition of artifacts from The Sarnoff Collection was presented in the TCNJ Library to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, an event in which David Sarnoff played a significant role. Below are texts and images from that exhibition.
In 1912, Sarnoff was assigned to manage the Marconi wireless station at the Wanamaker department store in New York City, which led to his participation in a pivotal moment in the history of communication. On the evening of April 14th, 1912, the ocean liner Titanic struck an iceberg and started taking on water. Almost immediately, the ship began transmitting distress signals. Soon the airwaves were flooded with news of the disaster as operators tracked the rescue effort. Sarnoff played an important role throughout the crisis  After three days at his Wanamaker’s post, he traveled to Marconi’s Sea Gate station on Coney Island. While there, he contacted the steamship Carpathia, which had picked up survivors from the Titanic and was returning to New York. Sarnoff proceeded to compile the names of these passengers and forward the good news to their families.
The sinking of the Titanic brought radio into the public spotlight and prompted Congress to regulate the medium for the first time. Sarnoff would refer to the incident as an important turning point in his career. “The Titanic disaster brought radio to the front,” he later recalled, “and incidentally me.”"
https://davidsarnoff.tcnj.edu/2013/08/3 ... -disaster/

...that was from the sarnoff collection. the 'jewish current' site tells a similar tale; but there are some interesting comments in the comment section below their bullshit story...

https://jewishcurrents.org/april-14-dav ... e-titanic/
mnew9
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Titanic

Unread post by mnew9 »

A picture of sister ships Olympic (left) and Titanic together during construction at Harland & Wolff in Belfast.

Image

http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_ ... ry_03.html
brianv
Member
Posts: 3971
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Titanic

Unread post by brianv »

mnew9 » April 2nd, 2017, 3:50 pm wrote:A picture of sister ships Olympic (left) and Titanic together during construction at Harland & Wolff in Belfast.

Image

http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_ ... ry_03.html
An image purporting to be in fact. Looks kinda cobbled together, which made me look at it further. Would they be afloat during construction? Not in dry dock?

Image
Kham
Admin
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 9:30 am

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Kham »

brianv, nice image of the Titanic and the Olympic. Been looking for all three sister ships in one image. Super hard to find. There were 3 ships said to have been built: the Titanic, the Olympic and the Britanic.
aa5
Member
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 3:03 am

Re: Titanic

Unread post by aa5 »

If we take out the iceberg part, and instead say the ship got torn apart by the forces of the sea on its maiden voyage(like big waves in stormy weather), the story would be 10 times more believable.
ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by ICfreely »

Titanic - I`m the king of the world! - Full scene HD

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRl0BO0XTlY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRl0BO0XTlY


:rolleyes: K, Leo, if you say so. That'll stay your little secret.
kickstones
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by kickstones »

ICfreely, looks like its going to be hard to hire submarine and check out the alleged wreck ....

Titanic shipwreck to be protected under treaty between US and UK

By Fox News January 22, 2020

“This momentous agreement with the United States to preserve the wreck means it will be treated with the sensitivity and respect owed to the final resting place of more than 1,500 lives,” said British Maritime Minister Nusrat Ghani in a statement announcing the news on Tuesday.

“The UK will now work closely with other North Atlantic States to bring even more protection to the wreck of the Titanic.”


However, it appears that they won't have to protect for much longer because according to the narrative....

Henrietta Mann, a researcher who co-discovered a new species of bacteria lurking in the “rusticles” growing off the wreckage, told the Brisbane Times that the ship may have just 30 years left before it vanishes for good. :rolleyes:

https://nypost.com/2020/01/22/titanic-s ... us-and-uk/

However, at least we will have the usual shoe/boot image for posterity...

Image
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/th ... w/titanic/
Macaria
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2022 3:43 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Macaria »

Titanic update.

Never before seen footage (suckers)!!

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-16/ ... c_news_web
Thousands of people tuned in to see the premiere of rare footage of the first submersible dives to Titanic shipwreck at the bottom of the North Atlantic.

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) streamed more than an hour of footage taken from the final resting place of the famed passenger ship on YouTube.

It was published on Thursday morning.

Here's what we know about it.

Is this new footage?

No, but most of it hasn't been released for public viewing until now.

It was shot during a deep sea expedition in July 1986.

[...]

Why is it being released now?

It's coinciding with the 25th anniversary and re-release of James Cameron's 1997 film Titanic in theatres.

"More than a century after the loss of Titanic, the human stories embodied in the great ship continue to resonate," the director said.
Hoaxing to promote a movie!
sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by sharpstuff »

Hoi polloi wrote:

Post by hoi.polloi » Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:05 am
Not too long ago, in 2003, when I was first getting really skeptical of the official story on 9/11 and angry at Bush's clear intent to invade Iraq for no good reason, I came across a site that claimed the people who thought 9/11 was an inside job were "as crazy" as those who thought the Titanic disaster never happened.
I would like to discuss whether the Titanic disaster did actually happen.

I am not sure that this thread (I can’t remember reading it originally) is heading in any particular direction.

The reason that I am writing this is because the Titanic is if some interest in relation to W.T. Stead. I discovered Stead many years ago and it interested me because my Grandmother was a Stead and it intrigued me that he had the same birth date as myself or that I might be a relative. The other thing that caught my interest was his actual work as a reporter. I scoured the (early dial-up!) Internet and began researching Stead, writing to various people all over the world. I created a web-page (having to learn HTML), bought his biography, Estelle’s book and several others given to me. I researched his family also. This means I know quite a good deal about this courageous man.

As an aside, I also have a copy of the National Geographic relating to the finding as well as Ballard’s book on the finding.

So far as I understand, Stead was on his way to a conference in America on the Titanic when it sank so I have to believe that Titanic was a real ship and find no point in claiming things about swapping one ship for another etc. Judging by the quality of photographic ‘evidence’ seems to me to be a waste of time.

I have to say I have never watched the film as it does not represent a documentary tale but is the vehicle for a romance (so far as I am aware) and may well be flawed in many aspects.

The question of its sinking is marred in the usual way for specific ‘reasons’. The answer could be as simple as to be designed to sink (there seems to be enough money to waste it for nefarious reasons) and therefore subsequent obfuscation is tantamount to success in any of these sort of projects. Whether the ship hit an ice-berg, I don’t know. So far as my research has been able to find, ice-bergs did not get that far down to the Titanic’s path but who could know. There are a myriad stories about who did what to whom but that is the nature of these staged events. I believe it certain that some other important passengers were targeted for disposal.

The Titanic ‘event’ is thus another part of controlling the public by deception.

Be well.
Peter
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:46 pm

Re: Titanic

Unread post by Peter »

sharpstuff wrote: Sun Feb 19, 2023 8:56 am I would like to discuss whether the Titanic disaster did actually happen.

I am not sure that this thread (I can’t remember reading it originally) is heading in any particular direction.

The reason that I am writing this is because the Titanic is if some interest in relation to W.T. Stead. I discovered Stead many years ago and it interested me because my Grandmother was a Stead and it intrigued me that he had the same birth date as myself or that I might be a relative. The other thing that caught my interest was his actual work as a reporter. I scoured the (early dial-up!) Internet and began researching Stead, writing to various people all over the world. I created a web-page (having to learn HTML), bought his biography, Estelle’s book and several others given to me. I researched his family also. This means I know quite a good deal about this courageous man.

As an aside, I also have a copy of the National Geographic relating to the finding as well as Ballard’s book on the finding.

So far as I understand, Stead was on his way to a conference in America on the Titanic when it sank so I have to believe that Titanic was a real ship and find no point in claiming things about swapping one ship for another etc. Judging by the quality of photographic ‘evidence’ seems to me to be a waste of time.

I have to say I have never watched the film as it does not represent a documentary tale but is the vehicle for a romance (so far as I am aware) and may well be flawed in many aspects.

The question of its sinking is marred in the usual way for specific ‘reasons’. The answer could be as simple as to be designed to sink (there seems to be enough money to waste it for nefarious reasons) and therefore subsequent obfuscation is tantamount to success in any of these sort of projects. Whether the ship hit an ice-berg, I don’t know. So far as my research has been able to find, ice-bergs did not get that far down to the Titanic’s path but who could know. There are a myriad stories about who did what to whom but that is the nature of these staged events. I believe it certain that some other important passengers were targeted for disposal.

The Titanic ‘event’ is thus another part of controlling the public by deception.

Be well.
Nobody is ever "targeted for disposal". Nobody dies, nobody gets hurt. We are in a hoax lie joke realm but we are not ruled by malevolence.

Titanic sinking was just another hoax, psyop, fear porn, also supporting the iceburg hoax. The hoax claimed Titanic had an identical sister ship. It never did. The "sister ship" that continued sailing after the Titanic incident was the Titanic, just named something else.
Post Reply