THE DERAILING ROOM

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

SteveO, you describe well some concerns I have with the Jewish-cultural-religious "conspiracy" that would be in plain sight, towering over all other psychopath Risk-characters playing the world like their private casino-slaughter-hoaxhouse...

In answer to jumpy, you never heard of this fellow? A "true jew/Jew/cult-reli-Jew" or not, it does not seem too positive, especially not for children? Since 1959...

Image 

Selene
jumpy64
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by jumpy64 »

Steve, I can't write much right now, but I promise that I will get back to the legitimate points you'raising here, also to clarify some important things.

Now I just want to tell you that I much appreciate your contribution here, especially in your latest posts. I might not agree with you here and there, but you're the only declared Jew in this thread, and you're legitimately defending your values and traditions in a very civil, polite way. And you're also offering valuable firsthand accounts of things most of us know only indirectly.

So thank you and write to you soon.

EDIT: I got a bit carried away here :) In fact, I disagree with Steve on most things, not just "here and there", but I still respect where he's coming from.
Last edited by jumpy64 on Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

jumpy64 wrote:Steve, I can't write much right now, but I promise that I will get back to the legitimate points you'raising here, also to clarify some important things.

Now I just want to tell you that I much appreciate your contribution here, especially in your latest posts. I might not agree with you here and there, but you're the only declared Jew in this thread, and you're legitimately defending your values and traditions in a very civil, polite way. And you're also offering valuable firsthand accounts of things most of us know only indirectly.

So thank you and write to you soon.
Jumpy, you are Italian, right? Have you ever been to Amsterdam? Or Antwerp? London maybe? New York? Israel? Moscow? Armenia? Persia?

Cities full of "cultural Jews" (as you labeled them, still a mystery to me how you can know that for all the conspirators around), are they living under a "Jewish_cult-reli conspiracy"? All those normal people having normal jobs and don't have any political or other power aspirations? The mayor of Amsterdam, Job Cohen, was a Jew (clear enough from the name), yet was criticised for being too multicultural-friendly (arguments for that are strong enough). Would you call promoting immigration of many muslims a "Jewish conspiracy"?? What is "Jewish" about it?

The second city of the country Rotterdam got a Moroccan-Dutch muslim (!) mayor not long after that. Did the people from Rotterdam live under a Moroccan/Muslim conspiracy, or is that different somehow?

Question is; which measures did you build in into your research based on intuition that help preventing you using a confirmation bias? Counting heads (I assume you haven't seen all -lacking?- foreskins...), is that enough stable ground for this uni-cultural-religious conspiracy to stand on??

Selene
Last edited by Selene on Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jumpy64
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by jumpy64 »

Seneca wrote:Oh so now you are changing the rules? Actually, all the good jews in that movie were christians ;)

What about "Once upon a time in America?". I don't remember it but it is about Jewish mobsters. It is from 1984 but was restored in 2012.
As you said, it is from 1984... But the reference to Jewish mobsters is very interesting. That is also a topic I'd like to be addressed here. Hoi already mentioned it in a previous post.

I mean, we Italian get almost all the attention in Mafia related topics and movies, but what about guys like Meyer Lansky (who was even acquitted in 1974), Bugsy Siegel (who's even memorialized in a New York's synagogue), Lepke Buchalter and the National Crime Syndicate, to give just a few examples? We haven't seen as many movies about them, have we?
jumpy64
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:44 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by jumpy64 »

Selene wrote:Cities full of "cultural Jews" (as you labeled them, still a mystery to me how you can know that for all the conspirators around), are they living under a "Jewish_cult-reli conspiracy"? All those normal people having normal jobs and don't have any political or other power aspirations? The mayor of Amsterdam, Job Cohen, was a Jew (clear enough from the name), yet was criticised for being too multicultural-friendly (arguments for that are strong enough). Would you call promoting immigration of many muslims a "Jewish conspiracy"?? What is "Jewish" about it?
Selene, I just said I can't write much right now, but one of your objections is so easy to deal with that I'm doing it anyway.

I've already said that Jewish politicians and activists are extremely "multicultural-friendly", but just in foreign cities and States, while advocating even dna tests to preserve the "Jewness" (I hope I wrote it rightly) of Israel. And that I think it's part of their tactics to weaken other countries while preserving their own.
Seneca
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Seneca »

Steve, if you are seeing there is misinformation spread here, it would be helpful if you provide a meaningful quote. The quote from Hoi and Simon you provided about blood sucking is clearly not misinformation. Neither of them was implying that the majority of jews were doing it at this moment in history.
I think that the only misinformation in that quote was "There is not a single Jew, or person of any religion, that I know that would tolerate such behavior."
I don't think it is very useful posting info about HIV on an anti-propaganda website. (I like this term Hoi)
Last edited by Seneca on Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

jumpy64 wrote:
Seneca wrote:Oh so now you are changing the rules? Actually, all the good jews in that movie were christians ;)

What about "Once upon a time in America?". I don't remember it but it is about Jewish mobsters. It is from 1984 but was restored in 2012.
As you said, it is from 1984... But the reference to Jewish mobsters is very interesting. That is also a topic I'd like to be addressed here. Hoi already mentioned it in a previous post.

I mean, we Italian get almost all the attention in Mafia related topics and movies, but what about guys like Meyer Lansky (who was even acquitted in 1974), Bugsy Siegel (who's even memorialized in a New York's synagogue), Lepke Buchalter and the National Crime Syndicate, to give just a few examples? We haven't seen as many movies about them, have we?
Jumpy, I don't mind you keep jumping from goalpost to goalpost, and that Hollywood and media have a higher than average % of Jews (at least based on names and/or own admittance) is no surprise either. That certain topics are taboo and others played out as long as the master psy-oplogist demands, is also no surprise, but what makes that "Jewish conspiracy" then so "Jewish"?

Which elements from the "Jewish cultural religious traditions" are uniquely and unavoidably linked to these conspiracies? Does the Torah or Talmud say "thou shalt deceive the world and kill your fellow Jews to get the "Holy Land" forever"? How come then that there are psychopathical, hoaxing, deceiving, egocentric, lying, enslaving, murdering Jews and at the same time Jews living according cultural or religious principles and -except their archaeic child mutilations- do no harm at all?

How can you ever sweep those two extremes together and call your painting "The Jewish Conspiracy In Plain Sight"? :wacko:

Selene
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

jumpy64 wrote:
Selene wrote:Cities full of "cultural Jews" (as you labeled them, still a mystery to me how you can know that for all the conspirators around), are they living under a "Jewish_cult-reli conspiracy"? All those normal people having normal jobs and don't have any political or other power aspirations? The mayor of Amsterdam, Job Cohen, was a Jew (clear enough from the name), yet was criticised for being too multicultural-friendly (arguments for that are strong enough). Would you call promoting immigration of many muslims a "Jewish conspiracy"?? What is "Jewish" about it?
Selene, I just said I can't write much right now, but one of your objections is so easy to deal with that I'm doing it anyway.

I've already said that Jewish politicians and activists are extremely "multicultural-friendly", but just in foreign cities and States, while advocating even dna tests to preserve the "Jewness" (I hope I wrote it rightly) of Israel. And that I think it's part of their tactics to weaken other countries while preserving their own.
Jumpy, this is not a stereotypical forum. On other fora which you may be used to (or not), it's a matter of fighting or "discarding the argument", Cluesforum is different. What counts here is evidence, arguments and other heavy content. Not "dismissing the argument". I see no battle between us, even if my style may come across like it. I am curious and hard yet open to be convinced of more shifts in my world views than I've experienced in the recent past.

Now you jump to a hypothesis that ties into the "refugee crisis", propagandised and semi-hoaxed this summer and indeed the cultural marxism that some Jews are playing out on others, like mayor Cohrn.

But then forcing multiculturalism onto people (of which a decent percentage of Jews) making a "standard practice" of "Jewish conspiracies" becomes problematic with Israel? There the opposite policy is enforced...

Fine to have an hypothesis, but that doesn't make it suddenly an argument for a case you have only constructed the first definition and some sketches for the future of? In 7 pages.

No need for rushed replies either. My questions stand quietly in the sand. Talking of which, take some time to watch Shlomo. Tell me what you think. Does this "pure Jewness" really exist? And if it doesn't, how can you mix "DNA/genealogy/offspring laws" with the definition that you specifically set at non-biological yet "cultural and religious traditions"?
ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by ICfreely »

I get where you’re coming from Steve O. I don’t take any credit/responsibility for any ‘Christian accomplishments/atrocities’ either. Anyone trying to piece together clues to prove a suspicion, ‘educated’ guess or (dreaded) theory, will most likely end up ‘proving’ their a priori assumption(s). 'Let truth be thy authority' is lost on a lot of people.

BTW, I second your 'declaration of freedom of thought' from the rocketry post!
I am just curious as to how, and why, we are certain that there even is a "vacuum" in (outer) space.

Is it simply taken for granted, or has there been any concrete evidence put forth of the lack of "earth like" atmosphere above the Karman line (100 km above sea level)?

regards,

Steve O.

"when everyone is thinking the same thing, chances are no one is thinking at all"
Tutankhamen, halleluiah and mazel-mazel!
omaxsteve
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:44 am
Contact:

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by omaxsteve »

Seneca wrote:Steve, if you are seeing there is misinformation spread here, it would be helpful if you provide a meaningful quote. The quote from Hoi and Simon you provided about blood sucking is clearly not misinformation. Neither of them was implying that the majority of jews were doing it at this moment in history.
I think that the only misinformation in that quote was "There is not a single Jew, or person of any religion, that I know that would tolerate such behavior."
I don't think it is very useful posting info about HIV on an anti-propaganda website. (I like this term Hoi)


You are right, Seneca, I stand corrected. The practice of of suctioning the blood by mouth to genital contact was one that I had never heard before yesterday. I stand by my statement that I do not (personally) know anyone that would , or should, tolerate such behavior. The "misinformation" I attempted to address was to prevent a person happening upon that to be led to believe that this is common practice in the modern area throughout the entire Jewish population, which is incorrect.

A video does not have to be proven to be "faked' for it to be labelled misleading.

As concerns the post that references HIV, it is my understanding that while the origin of the disease is one of the major "hoaxes' that are discusssed here, I am unaware of any controversy about the devastation and the importance of trying to quell the spread. That being said the article mentioned other benefits of circumcision besides it's apparent effectiveness in curtailing the spread of HIV.

regards,

Steve O.
Seneca
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Seneca »

Selene wrote: Now you jump to a hypothesis that ties into the "refugee crisis", propagandised and semi-hoaxed this summer and indeed the cultural marxism that some Jews are playing out on others, like mayor Cohrn.

But then forcing multiculturalism onto people (of which a decent percentage of Jews) making a "standard practice" of "Jewish conspiracies" becomes problematic with Israel? There the opposite policy is enforced...

Fine to have an hypothesis, but that doesn't make it suddenly an argument for a case you have only constructed the first definition and some sketches for the future of? In 7 pages.
Jumpy64 isn't jumping to a hypothesis. He had mentioned this already in his first post:
jumpy64 wrote:They even have a collective name for the rest of the world, talking about it as an inferior species even in their religious texts. Consider this: in a "multicultural" world where everybody is supposed to say "no to racism", they can be openly and often viciously racist (and act upon their racism in very concrete ways, not just theorize about it), and have people not noticing or justifying it.

And not only that. They're even considered "progressive freedom-fighters" by most people because in the last couple of centuries at least they've been actually leading organizations that fight for the rights of “oppressed minorities” and immigrants. Admirable, you might say. But the problem is that, in the most blatant case of "double standards", in their own state they do the exact opposite of what they preach in others, expanding their borders with terroristic violence and closing them to anybody who doesn't belong to their race (they even have DNA tests to insure that!). They want us to think that race is just a form of "cultural conditioning", while they do everything to preserve their own.

And isn't it significant that they're fighting their battles for the rights of minorities exclusively in the countries were the predominant race is still (but most probably not for long) the one their religious texts consider their worst enemy? They seem to be applying to the West the "divide and conquer" tactics that their sacred books, but also their religious and political leaders, often preach openly about. And they’re doing it to the point of taking us to the verge of what can be considered, to all effects and purposes, a genocide against the targeted race.

It seems pretty clear to me that there is only one ethnic group in the world who really stands to benefit from the havoc that "multiculturalism" and mass immigration (to mention just a couple of main problems of our times, but this group seems to be behind several others too, like the usury of banking systems, for example) is causing in the western world. It seems just reasonable to think it must be the same group that spreads these phenomena in the rest of the world while protecting itself from them.
But I agree he needs to provide evidence. Here is some http://jlb.oxfordjournals.org/content/e ... sv027.full
The Israeli State recently announced that it may begin to use genetic tests to determine whether potential immigrants are Jewish or not. This development would demand a rethinking of Israeli law on the issue of the definition of Jewishness.
Selene wrote: No need for rushed replies either. My questions stand quietly in the sand. Talking of which, take some time to watch Shlomo. Tell me what you think. Does this "pure Jewness" really exist? And if it doesn't, how can you mix "DNA/genealogy/offspring laws" with the definition that you specifically set at non-biological yet "cultural and religious traditions"?
I watched the Shlomo lecture and it was interesting although not new. But it made me think about the Jewish state and its relation to the other conspiracies. But it appears that people are still not getting what I meant.
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

omaxsteve wrote: As concerns the post that references HIV, it is my understanding that while the origin of the disease is one of the major "hoaxes' that are discusssed here, I am unaware of any controversy about the devastation and the importance of trying to quell the spread. That being said the article mentioned other benefits of circumcision besides it's apparent effectiveness in curtailing the spread of HIV.

regards,

Steve O.
Dear Steve, not having seen an HIVirus or anything alike, my position is the same as yours.

But a narrative that your are repeating here about "circumcision helps against AIDS" is either a double hoax in one or a missolution (cf. misinformation) against a real disease (or hoax).

This is the sales pitch...

The eventual sociodramatic effect amongst healthy sexual Homo sapiens becomes clear when the still-dominant Catholic Church actively disencourage a real protection against an either real or fake disease; condoms.

"What the heck, I'm circumcised, screw you" :rolleyes:

Jewish culture and successful sales are rather positive than negative correlating...
Critical Mass
Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:33 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Critical Mass »

omaxsteve wrote: Finally on the subject of circumcision, it is not completely black and white issue. There are some very strong arguments on the anti-circumcision side, but it is not a totally one-sided argument;
I've already posted to a (hilarious) pro-circumcision site... however on average, per annum, exactly how many babies die from penile cancer or get HIV or other STD's or suffer from allegedly painful 'first time sexual experiences' or all the other pro-circumcision 'facts' that get brought up?

For a member of Cluesforum to say that this is not a 'black & white' issue is... troubling to me.

We're not a bunch of limp-wristed, weak willed, dithering academics here... we're meant to be the 'creme de la creme' of skeptical thought.

Are you seriously saying the unconsented mutilation of babies (or children in general) due to the paranormal 'religion' or 'culture' of one's parents is not a 'black & white' issue?

I ask again, what if you were a child born of Jewish (or Muslim or British Aristocratic) parents who doesn't want to be circumcised?
What legal protection does our wonderful 'modern society' provide these people?
Are babies really people... or just objects?



I, for one, will say it is a 'Black & white' issue...

Black... I own you & I'm cutting off your dick skin because I 'love' you.
White... your body is your own. Do with it as you wish.

I suppose one could also ask... should 'foreskin reconstruction' surgeries be offered for free?
Last edited by Critical Mass on Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Selene
Banned
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 pm

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Selene »

Thanks Seneca for correcting me of the jumpiness, apparently I projected my own... :unsure:

Ok, so you knew already what Sand was talking about. I didn't. It was new for me to see a decent and to a naked eye honest intellectual speaking so freely.

It's the base for both parties; both the Zionists and the "racial"-Jewish conspiracy (where jumpy jumped away from in his definition) proponents.

Genealogical research between 2000 and 0/Exodus time/any other moment that may or may not have been faked in the history books is impossible.

DNA (if it exists) reseach doesn't seem to show a "Jewish people".

Is the whole thing not becoming a bit silly...? :huh:

PS: big thumbs up for Critical Mass's rant against child mutilation and fight for self-ownership!
Seneca
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:36 pm
Contact:

Re: "Hiding in Plain Sight: Reflections on an Open Conspirac

Unread post by Seneca »

omaxsteve wrote: You are right, Seneca, I stand corrected. The practice of of suctioning the blood by mouth to genital contact was one that I had never heard before yesterday. I stand by my statement that I do not (personally) know anyone that would , or should, tolerate such behavior. The "misinformation" I attempted to address was to prevent a person happening upon that to be led to believe that this is common practice in the modern area throughout the entire Jewish population, which is incorrect.

A video does not have to be proven to be "faked' for it to be labelled misleading.

As concerns the post that references HIV, it is my understanding that while the origin of the disease is one of the major "hoaxes' that are discusssed here, I am unaware of any controversy about the devastation and the importance of trying to quell the spread. That being said the article mentioned other benefits of circumcision besides it's apparent effectiveness in curtailing the spread of HIV.

regards,

Steve O.
Thanks for you reply. I see now that you were also not misinforming. I somehow misinterpreted what you meant by "tolerating". Sorry about that.

The topic about AIDS is here: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1455, I gather you haven't seen it.
I see some analogy between the circumcision debate and the vaccines debate, especially in the arguments of the proponents. As I mentioned, I think vaccines are a hoax and I regret giving them to my son. But it still isn't easy to argue with one of the professional promoters.
I find it interesting that you didn't mention circumcision when you were talking about religious practices secular jews were observing. Is this because you consider it a medical practice?
A lot of religious practices from Christianity were also "secularized" and continued as "medical" or other "scientific" practices, although I can't come up with an example.
Post Reply