AnOrdinaryAmerican wrote:Hi guys. I just completed a new Batman Man Shooting Hoax video you might be interested in. When the clown-orange haired version of Holmes first came out. I thought he looked familiar. I finally realized who he was.
Hello,
The research regarding the NASA fakes here in this forum is close to the truth but the most important thing is to draw the conclusion why they are doing this to us.
As far as I can see is this an atheist forum not discussing the satanic roots at the top of the conspiracy with secret societies who have occult knowledge to contact the "Fallen Angels/Demons" that are in the dimension we cant see.
For me as a believer there is nothing more sure than that there are no other galaxies or even solar systems.
The Hubble telescope and everything associated with it is a hoax and the stars are of course no suns.
But the real truth that they want to hide from us exceeds the ability of imagination for the majority of people since the truth is that we live on the inside of the earth with the "universe" in the middle of us:
Light expands like a magnetic field and not straight what makes it an illusion if we look at the horizon and see the earths surface go down even if it goes up in reality.
If this topic is allowed to discuss here I would like to write an article about that, maybe an Admin can post his thoughts about that theory.
The same black robed bandits who castigated the Shah of Iran for his opulent lifestyle are now using his Sa'dabad Palace to host foreign ‘dignitaries.’
The bathroom in my grandfather’s home in Urmia had a ‘squat toilet’ (I shit you not). Even some of the newer homes in Iran were equipped with squat toilets, regular toilets and bidets. I’d always wondered why?
That was a truly arrogant response, especially considering it was addressed to an imaginary person and certainly not myself since from my first post I have consistently stated that rocketry would not work in a vacuum (http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 7#p2404517).
To bring in the discussion about hypnotism from the other thread not only demonstrates your mental weakness in being unable to explain yourself without having to resort to character assassination, but it is a testament to your inability to consider anyone else's frame of thought other than your own.
Dear WL,
I did not mean to come off as arrogant but can understand it could be read that way. Let's not fill up this thread with chit chat. There's PMs and a chat box for that. And please understand that the people on this forum (I'm a recent arriver) have been doing this for years and are a bit tired of people asking questions and bringing up things that have already been covered.
Assholes, anger, alcohol and pubs exist...I encounter one, feel one, drink one and frequent one but maybe not necessarily in that order...
Rule #1 Do what you want...
Rule #2 Do no harm to anyone...
Rule #3 ...er...
I truly dislike having to create a “topic” like this. But, having reviewed every single post in the Derailing Room, I am now able to articulate the basis for this decision.
You see, there are often well written and insightful posts to be found in the general Derailing Room. But for whatever reason (usually off topic), they sit (almost) uselessly, seldom to be read by anyone.
On the other hand, and just as often, there are cheap or deliberately insulting one-liners or odiously long and pointless distractions contained therein. While these should arguably be deleted, it is my position that they may serve a purpose in the future, as we become better acquainted with the nature of forum disrupters.
Let’s face it, ten or twenty years from now, the membership here will have more insight than it has now. And it would be a shame to deprive those members of anything that could be useful, even if it’s only to review the change in tactics and so forth over the years.
So, I have created this for the Admins/Mods as an alternative to the Derailing Room. An otherwise acceptable post that simply derails (or tends to derail) a topic should continue to be placed in the Derailing Room, as is now customary.
But, posts that have essentially no substantive or probative value, and contain primarily (or purely) ad hominem attacks and/or utter nonsense (i.e. shill/troll activity) should be placed in what I’m referring to as “The Garbage Bin.”
As a matter of guidance to the Moderators: Please note that a post that properly belongs in this “topic” does indeed reflect poorly on its author. That does not however mean that a warning or a ban should be made or imposed. That is a judgment call for the Moderator, and ultimately (in the long run) one for the Admins. The key here is discerning whether the poster is acting in good faith or not. Importantly, I will add, a Member’s (positive) posting history and/or rank should weigh heavily against his/her post being placed in “The Garbage Bin.”
Obviously this is an ongoing process, and I’m still sorting through the Derailing Room, amongst other places. Thank you for your patience as I’m doing this slowly and methodically, and alongside organization of “The Holocaust” topic(s).
If you have any questions for me about how this should be used, please don’t hesitate to email me: clueman78 at outlook dot com.
Observer » November 8th, 2018, 5:40 pm wrote:Agreed that this is another fake "shooting" (produced of course with the usual combination of live-actors and CGI-avatars, about which the psyop producers hope we'll once again become divided arguing with each other in the false-dichotomy of "ALL characters shown in videos/images are CGI-avatars" vs. "ALL characters shown in vidoes/images are live-actors".)
But, can I play devil's advocate on the first clue mentioned: isn't that easily explainable as just a small black/indian girl holding that sheet up, facing the person she's trying to cover, her head blocked by the head/torso of the person she is covering? Her dark fingers (and even a little dark leg) can be seen, right?
That same page you linked to, which contained that photo you quickly analyzed, contains a video which uses the same image for its thumbnail (http://video.foxnews.com/v/5859440822001).
. . .
But again, I agree that this is of course another fake "shooting", which will of course contain various UN-explainable goofs proving photoshopping and CGI-avatars, mixed together with actual live-actor shots.
I guess it's just a coincidence that we recently revived the old Arizona "shooting" and now suddenly they go live with this "California" shooting. Haha.
Dear Observer,
I must agree on all points. My introductory post this morning was done in haste. In fact, this afternoon my kids pointed out those fingers, which escaped me before.
[Note: I’m not saying that is a natural position. And I’m certainly not saying this image depicts reality.]
The kids did point out some other problems with it however.
I’m probably going to edit that post with the same image, and focus on something else. I’d hate for the beginning post here, by me no less, to have a flimsy “point” being made, when there is much better evidence of deception here.
But, I will look around at the other images from this event before doing so.
A “devil’s advocate” is sometimes needed around here. I often play that role just for myself.