nonhocapito » September 26th, 2018, 11:17 am wrote:I don't know about you guys, but my vicsim radar went off the charts as I saw this picture:
Dn0AEhvW0AMA5Hh-746x1024.jpgThe alleged Christine Blasey Ford (according to
Internet Anagram Server: "Forcibly Disheartens"). I am fairly certain this person does not exist and will never physically appear in front of a camera or in a court of law. Her face has been generated with the same, unapdated, bogus CIA/Mossad/whatever software used to generate the thousands of pictures of the 9/11 vicsims. The triple chin, the turtle neck, the superimposed face, eyes that don't belong... the fake ageing of the photo... it's all there... Please tell me you guys see what I see.
More pictures of "Ford":

A summary of the story for the uninformed, on wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kav ... llegationsAnd elsewhere:
http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/09/ ... asey-ford/
Greatly post dear Nonhocapito. I haven’t paid enough attention to this predictable drama to even consider that the “accuser” here is a sim.
The contrived nature of it, along with the (quite literally) unbelievable timing of the accusation was enough for me to chalk it up to political theater. Rest assured a genuine victim under those circumstances would NOT have waited until somebody was already on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to finally speak up.
Sure, some victims don’t say anything for a long time for a number of reasons. But the idea that a lawyer or law professor would fail to say anything when a person is first nominated to a federal court, and THEN bring it 12 years later. . . well, I find that notion grasping for plausibility.
That said, a sim is capable of just about anything that the story tellers wish it to.
The imagery above is certainly suspect, whether it is a modification based on a real person or not.
The nose in the top one is not consistent with the lower resolution nose on the bottom left image. Also, the “sporty” image (bottom left) with the sunglasses appears to be such that the right shoulder is transparent, or invisible, but with an outline.
The mouth and the teeth in particular fail to maintain consistency from one image to the next. Also, the eyes are abnormally close together in the two where they are visible.
When I get some time I’ll go look through any others I can find and come back for more analysis of this.
Thanks again for posting, and it will be interesting to see where this topic goes.
And BRAVO for the newly coined term “unapdated”- or is that “unAPdated”?- either way it’s hilarious

, and brilliant. I’m not sure why, but it about made my day.
