My point here is that there is a very complex set of dynamics in play, and it would be disingenuous to oversimplify those things.
Absolutely, dear SCS. The thing is, I suspect that what you call "a very complex set of dynamics in play"
is being deliberately fuelled and exploited by the Powerclowns-That-Be (a.k.a. The "Nutwork" - which ostensibly pursues a long-in-the-making, predominantly zionist-"inspired" scheme), the end goal being a worldwide "dismantling of cultural variety". The divide & conquer tactics deployed to this end are for all to see: not only do they "succesfully" generate (read: "engineer") racism between different ethnic groups, but they also effectively inflame discord and conflict between people of same / similar origins. This may not be as evident for North American citizens (who are ALL 'recent descendants' of hordes of immigrants anyway!) as it is for the citizens of the various nations in Old Europe - each one of which with its own peculiar wealth of culture (art, literature, music, language, cuisine, sense of humor... you name it). Personally, I certainly deplore the looming prospect of this variety of cultures to disappear - and no, that doesn't make me a "rabid nationalist" or a "white supremacist" - by any stretch of imagination. Is my concern for this "looming disappearance" unjustified? Would it take eons, at the current rates of immigration, before Old Europe would turn into a dull, undistinguishable block of "homogenous individuals" (à-la-Kalergi-plan)? Well, let us all remember how long it took
for countless "Native American" tribes, each with their own specific culture, to be wiped into oblivion following the brutal mass emigrations from the "Old World" to the "New World". One century? Two, perhaps?
To be sure, the "red American Indians" might have contained
such a wholesale annihilation / genocide*
of their magnificent variety of people & cultures if they had, somehow, implemented some wise safeguards against that unsustainable mass invasion of "whites" and "blacks"(mostly brought over to the Americas by the ruthless jewish slave trade) - and today, the "Land Of The Free and Home Of The Brave" would be a far more interesting, colorful and culturally multi-faceted territory to visit.
*The most systematical yet "unsung" genocide of any tribe(s) in recent history is, undeniably, that of the so-called Native Americans. To deny this fact is, in my mind, morally criminal. Even if the official account of the "Holocaust genocide" were real (it is obviously full of holes), it would pale in comparison.
Now, the attentive reader will surely have noticed an apparent, inherent contradiction in my personal take of this extremely complex subject matter. On one hand, I am saying that a mixed ("colorful") society is a desirable / more interesting one - while on the other hand, I am saying that the (mass) immigration flows currently afflicting Europe are undesirable / and a threat to the very survival of so many different, historical European cultures.
And therein lies the extreme complexity of this particular, 'global problem'!
Do I have a "quick-fix solution" to this problem? Absolutely not. In my "innocent" youth, I used to think there should be no
borders between any of the lands / territories of this planet. I've been an immigrant / or "expat" for pretty much my entire life (I've only lived in my countries of origin, Norway - only as a summer tourist - and Sweden, for 3-4 years in total). I feel no attachment whatsoever to any country / state / nation. Today, I fully recognize that I have been privileged enough to move around this world at will - and getting to know (and love & appreciate) a whole bunch of different cultures & tribes - along with their own traditions and languages. I cannot recall one single episode of "racism" directed against myself*
(nor vice versa!). So WHO AM I (and who could possibly pretend) to ask anyone to "stay put" in their own country of birth indefinitely, i.e. for the entire duration of their lives? It would be, for someone like myself, utter hypocrisy to deny anyone the right to move from one country to another.
*Actually, the only unpleasant instance (of "labeling") was when an old friend of mine in the USA recently suggested that I might be an "unwitting racist" or, wait for it, a "white supremacist"!
Food for thought - innit? Again, I certainly don't pretend to have a solution to all this - and I don't expect to reach one anytime soon. Meanwhile, I will keep hoping that we all refrain from arguing amongst ourselves (at least here on this forum) - and stick silly labels (as relentlessly used by the news media) on each other for whatever 'outlooks and leanings' we may have on the subject. As it is, I've had the pleasure to meet both Kham and ElSushi in person - and consider them as particularly thoughtful, considerate and loveable individuals. Kham - a white American gentlewoman - currently enjoys co-existing (in the USA) with an immigrant culture very different from her own (the much-demeaned Muslim people) - and so does ElSushi, a white Spanish-French gentleman and longtime immigrant / or "expat" in Japan (who is happily co-existing with Japanese people). I myself am enjoying living / co-existing among Italians - which are certainly very different from my original "Viking" ancestors... So, pray tell, what exactly are we guys to opine - when it comes to "the problems" (or the "bright sides") of intermingling cultures? Can any of us be labeled as a "hateful racist"? Of course not: we enjoy living in the vicinity of totally different folks than ourselves. In any case, the three of us are in a very bad position to discourage people from relocating around the world, at will!
Please consider this post of mine as some sort of "moderation" of this thread. We need to tackle this spiny problem with utmost honesty, intelligence and thoughtfulness. I will certainly not engage in any censorship of discussions related to the role of zionism in our current geo-politics - since such censorship is, nowadays (unlike say, 50 years ago), all-too-evident in the mainstream media. At the same time, I will not endorse / encourage any wholesale vilification of the Jewish people as a whole
- since this is just silly. It would be like saying that ALL Italians are criminal psychopaths - because the Mafia originated in the (Italian) island of Sicily... To be sure, the Italian Mafia (now deeply embedded in the Italian government) keeps perpetrating the most wicked crimes against their OWN people and kin: no "racism" to see here, folks - move on! Just like the VAST MAJORITY of Europeans, Asians, Arabs, Africans, Asians, Americans, (etc) are decent people, the VAST MAJORITY of Jews are decent people too. This shouldn't be too hard for anyone to understand: this has absolutely NOTHING to do with "racial hatred" (on the part of decent people like you and me) - whatsoever. The so-called "Jewish problem" we have in this world is upheld solely by a restrict "mob" of insane Zionist Power Maniacs - who have managed to lure a "mob" of insane Gentile Power Maniacs on board of their reckless pirate ship. And pirate ships should be sunk - for the good of the VAST MAJORITY of decent, peace-loving people on this world.
The CHARLEMAGNE PRIZE: the very first recipient of that Prize was Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, a mason and President of the Pan-European Union founded in 1923 and subsequently financed by the Jewish banker Max Warburg. He wrote a pamphlet titled "Praktischer Idealismus" which basically (yet quite clearly) stated that the Jews are this world's "master race" - and that all other "races, classes and diversities" should vanish through interbreeding...(I kid you not!). Here's an extract of his pamphlet :
Richard Coudenhove Kalergi wrote:"The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process."
And - believe it or not - Mr. Coudenhove Kalergi is today officially hailed as ... (citing Wickedpedia):
"The pioneer of European integration, he served as the founding president of the Paneuropean Union for 49 years, which would be the preliminary ideological foundation of the European Union." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_v ... ve-Kalergi
One of the latest (2016) recipients of the "CHARLEMAGNE Prize" : Pope Francis
(The Charlemagne Prize is awarded each year to those "who actively contribute to European unity and integration").
Read all about the Charlemagne Prize here (and its past recipients) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne_Prize
Of course, Pope Francis is officially known to be "the first Jesuit Pope" of all times. Today, thanks to the most acute independent researchers of our times, we know that the "Jesuits" (or "the Society of Jesus", founded by Ignacio de Loyola back in 1534) was founded by Jews / and crypto-Jews who were persecuted by the Inquisition. The emergence of the "Jesuits" (or "Jewsuits", as I call them) was therefore nothing but a bold (yet ultimately successful) attempt to infiltrate the Roman Catholic Church. This is why you will now find "scholars" on lecture tours (read: "gatekeepers") who will tell you that "the Jews are not to blame for our current woes, the Jesuits are!"... Moreover, we may now consider the "Jesuit order" as a ploy to recruit non-Jews (or "anti-papal dissidents", if you will) to the cause of zionism - something that appears to have worked, so far, very well indeed.
Not convinced? Here's from the VATICAN INSIDER WORLD NEWS :
https://www.lastampa.it/2013/11/13/vati ... agina.html