The CORONAVIRUS circus

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
Newsbender
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 12:15 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Newsbender »

This was about what we expected, I guess. It is a fairly good summary of the last few years for those who haven't been paying attention, with zero Earth-shattering revelations.

Some notes I made while watching:

- There are some good clips in here that they have tried to remove from YT, such as Gates' TED talk quote "if we do a really good job on vaccination, we can lower the population" (paraphrasing) and Event 201. Useful to have them all in one place like this, for the uninitiated. Some great rhetorical soundbites from Nutwork leaders and celebrity mouthpieces that many might have missed the first time round.
- Some interesting testimonies from industry professionals, such as embalmers. They seem genuine, not actors, to me.
- At 19.35 the call looks out of place and obviously staged to me. Not sure why this was included.

One can only speculate as to the ultimate purpose of the video: if we are to assume this is a gatekeeping exercise led by controlled opposition (Stew Peters), perhaps they* need around 30% (or whatever) of the population to refuse the jabs in order to give them the leverage they need to ultimately force the mandates. E.g. a "we tried making it voluntary but that didn't work" stance. The more demonstrations and pushback there is, the better for them.

Or maybe this is put out there as a kind of confession to get manufactured consent. From their perspective, releasing this info via these gatekeeping channels indemnifies them from any guilt or culpability ("don't say we didn't warn you, the information was out there that these shots are harmful").

I have little doubt that these jabs are killing and maiming people, however. Just from my own family and small circle of friends we have had one death and several long term hospitalizations as a direct result of the shots. One friend will never work again and a relative who was previously a keen hiker is now permanently wheelchair-bound. None of them make the connection, of course.

Dozens of people I work with are in many cases frequently off sick for weeks at a time since getting boosted. (I am self employed and work for six companies so have a larger than average number of colleagues I work with closely). Since it appears this really is global genocide, I am reluctant to refer to anything that exposes it (even in a limited hangout way) as "fear porn". (Although I could do without the doom-laden, menacing music and jump cuts.)

*By their/they/them I don't necessarily mean the public-facing goons such as Schwab, Gates, et al. But the Nutwork in general.
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

I also watched it, thought it was OK. Bit confused as to why the introduction had to include other false flags.
This could discourage it's target audience from watching it all. Making them think just more conspiracy theories.

With the release of this and Musk purchasing Twitter allowing the anti vax posts back. Can't help thinking that it's all being engineered for there to be a mass up rising, against the perceived major players.
Then in the midst of the chaos some form of Authoritarian World Order is implemented.

Here is a typical post being allowed back on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/abikhalil_t/status/ ... 0035962881
Image



Image
Mansur
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Mansur »

antipodean wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 3:59 amHere is a typical post being allowed back on Twitter.
My theory is that 'being allowed' practically means 'being pushed massively ', especially if that is 'typical', - - as we are accustomed to from propaganda. If such a thing can be accustomed to at all.

I wonder if it has been observed that during the whole corona circus, not one item that was at first clearly 'conspiracy theory' and ' alternative media' has after six months or a year appeared in the mainstream in a positive form? (E.g. the 'artificial virus created in Wuhan'...etc.)

EM's purchase of Twitter, or reports of it, may help to whet the appetite.
Of course I could just be way over paranoid, couldn't I, Antipodean?
____
"... to poison people slowly."
This 'slowly' is just vague enough that this very vagueness is the only important thing about it.
"...crime against humanity..."
When terms like that pop up (there are quite a lot of them) I always involuntarily assume that such things have long since lost a real audience. But I am wrong again and again.
_______
The guy (Peters) might serve as apropos to create the category 'almost mainstream'. Retrospectively, many people could be classified there.
rusty
Member
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:01 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by rusty »

Newsbender wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:25 pm if we are to assume this is a gatekeeping exercise led by controlled opposition (Stew Peters), perhaps they* need around 30% (or whatever) of the population to refuse the jabs in order to give them the leverage they need to ultimately force the mandates. E.g. a "we tried making it voluntary but that didn't work" stance. The more demonstrations and pushback there is, the better for them.
Not sure this is the case. I rather think that Stew Peters (= Stupiders) is another gatekeeping, disinformation, discredit by association asset. He also once featured this pretty young doctor "Carrie Madej" in his show, claiming that the clot shot contains living, unkillable little creatures. Never heard of this again, not sure if she just had a mad dej or if this was done intentionally to madej the waters ...
Nefilimp
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:43 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Nefilimp »

He also did the snake venom thing; Watch the Water
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stew+peters+s ... 4-1&ia=web

There is this woman pushed by Odysee; Amandha Vollmer, someone who is very clear about the virus nonsense and she does a lot of interviews about it. So on her Substack someone mentioned that the virus theory is as stupid as the idea that the earth is flat. This is what she responded;
I think you mean "virology is as stupid as globe earth", as the earth is not a ball hurtling through space. You may want to do a proper deep dive on the true earth cosmology. I will eventually write an article on this important topic, as well.

And then in the next reply;

It would be wise if you educated yourself first before commenting. I see people do this along and it is ill informed.

True, there are no UFOs (other than the government stealing tech from inventors who made saucer tech, for example John Searle, Viktor Schauberger. There are no aliens but due to the fact there is more land they are hiding from us, there could be some unknown and strange things out there (that is what is called outer space), the earth IS FLAT. Welcome to the great awakening. Since you are new to the topic, this is a good one for beginners: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oM3JpKWBqnE Study tartaria and the mud flood info, that also will help.
:lol: :blink:
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7246
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by simonshack »

Nefilimp wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:35 am
There is this woman pushed by Odysee; Amandha Vollmer, someone who is very clear about the virus nonsense and she does a lot of interviews about it. So on her Substack someone mentioned that the virus theory is as stupid as the idea that the earth is flat. This is what she responded;
Oh no! Ah well - perhaps it should be of no surprise... :rolleyes:
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

I wonder how many more countries the following could apply too, in terms of over looked legislation..

A New Zealand employment lawyer has gone through the 1956 NZ Public Health Act with a fine tooth comb. (I suppose someone's gotta do it)

Under Section 92i Sub section 5 of the act it states.
In no case may a direction require an individual to submit to compulsory treatment
Why couldn't this have been found 2 years ago? I wouldn't be now unemployed.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/pub ... whole.html

Go to 16 minutes
https://rumble.com/v1xq2j6-november-28- ... KtKVhuZEfI
Nefilimp
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:43 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Nefilimp »

antipodean wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:32 am I wonder how many more countries the following could apply too, in terms of over looked legislation..

A New Zealand employment lawyer has gone through the 1956 NZ Public Health Act with a fine tooth comb. (I suppose someone's gotta do it)

Under Section 92i Sub section 5 of the act it states.
In no case may a direction require an individual to submit to compulsory treatment
Why couldn't this have been found 2 years ago? I wouldn't be now unemployed.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/pub ... whole.html

Go to 16 minutes
https://rumble.com/v1xq2j6-november-28- ... KtKVhuZEfI
Does this also mean you can sue for damages? I told all my friends that were forced by their employer to have them sign a document in which it states that the employer would take full responsibility of any negative reaction to this jab. It is of course a very gray area because the medical cronies can just claim that this turbo cancer/blood cloth/heart problem/death is not the result of the jab but still, it gives the employer something to think about. None of my friends did though, they just took the jab as if it is normal that your employer can decide that you have to take part in this big experiment if you want to continue working there; it is ridiculous.
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

Nefilimp wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:02 am

Does this also mean you can sue for damages? I told all my friends that were forced by their employer to have them sign a document in which it states that the employer would take full responsibility of any negative reaction to this jab. It is of course a very gray area because the medical cronies can just claim that this turbo cancer/blood cloth/heart problem/death is not the result of the jab but still, it gives the employer something to think about. None of my friends did though, they just took the jab as if it is normal that your employer can decide that you have to take part in this big experiment if you want to continue working there; it is ridiculous.
Last year when I was mandated to be vaccinated, below is part of an email exchange I had with my employer.
Just one question, would I be eligible for compensation to myself or family, should I suffer any side effects from the Astrazeneca vaccine?
Should I also sign any documentation absolving those who administer the jab from any responsibilities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB_5pL74EoA
This was their reply.
-----n as discussed in our meeting on Monday this is an agreement that you have decided to enter into out of your own, S------- will not take responsibility for any ramifications/complications that may result from the administration of the AstraZeneca vaccine. If you indeed wish to have indemnity from the potential effects from the vaccine this would be a separate agreement that you would need to discuss and enter into with the company/authority administering and supplying the vaccine.
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

It was only a matter of time until a situation like this happened. Parents of 4 month baby fight for it's right to receive unvaccinated blood, during life saving operation.
https://rumble.com/v1xllk6-freedom-to-c ... blood.html

Auckland Hospital are now trying to claim guardianship over the baby.
There was an administration hearing today from both parties in the Auckland High Court.
https://rumble.com/v1xza3k-post-court-s ... 11.22.html

The case is now adjourned for next Tuesday.
Nefilimp
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:43 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Nefilimp »

-----n as discussed in our meeting on Monday this is an agreement that you have decided to enter into out of your own, S------- will not take responsibility for any ramifications/complications that may result from the administration of the AstraZeneca vaccine. If you indeed wish to have indemnity from the potential effects from the vaccine this would be a separate agreement that you would need to discuss and enter into with the company/authority administering and supplying the vaccine.
[/quote]

Despicable, it is them forcing you, not the maker of the experimental concoction.
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

Nefilimp wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:20 pm
-----n as discussed in our meeting on Monday this is an agreement that you have decided to enter into out of your own, S------- will not take responsibility for any ramifications/complications that may result from the administration of the AstraZeneca vaccine. If you indeed wish to have indemnity from the potential effects from the vaccine this would be a separate agreement that you would need to discuss and enter into with the company/authority administering and supplying the vaccine.
Despicable, it is them forcing you, not the maker of the experimental concoction.

The problem is I worked for a private company that was a contracted for working within a Gov. dept that had been mandated.
The private contractor just hide behind the Gov. order.
Obviously I can only directly challenge my employer the PCBU. (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking)
But the private contracting company could have communicated my concerns/ grievance to the Gov. dept I was working under. Which could have covered them when compensation is claimed, for when I submit a Personal Grievance claim to the employment court.

Around the world there are various territorial authorities rolling back the mandates, to the point of demanding workers get reinstated with back pay.
This will eventually flow on to NZ. Plus I've still got the recently discovered Health Act clause up my sleeve.
The Lawyer in the video I posted will be using it to request a judicial review.
In no case may a direction require an individual to submit to compulsory treatment
Nefilimp
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:43 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Nefilimp »

The problem is I worked for a private company that was a contracted for working within a Gov. dept that had been mandated.
The private contractor just hide behind the Gov. order.
Obviously I can only directly challenge my employer the PCBU. (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking)
But the private contracting company could have communicated my concerns/ grievance to the Gov. dept I was working under. Which could have covered them when compensation is claimed, for when I submit a Personal Grievance claim to the employment court.

Around the world there are various territorial authorities rolling back the mandates, to the point of demanding workers get reinstated with back pay.
This will eventually flow on to NZ. Plus I've still got the recently discovered Health Act clause up my sleeve.
The Lawyer in the video I posted will be using it to request a judicial review.
In no case may a direction require an individual to submit to compulsory treatment
About a decade ago I worked for a company and I drove a company car, a used one of about two or three years old. Then I got an email stating I was to deliver my car to the garage next week and there would be a brand new one waiting for me! So obviously my colleagues were very happy but I was just thinking; hmmm, that nice brandnew car smell that is toxic. So I emailed them back, saying I wanted to keep my old car and I enclosed a study done about phtalates and their dangers. I was completely ignored; they did not even bother responding. My colleagues just responded with the normal 'give me my fluoride water' expression saying that 'anything kills you these days' whilst plugging their bluetooth headsets in their ears. I did not have a choice other than to quit or to find a solution and since I needed the money I decided to just work around it. After picking the car I drove around with the windows open all the time with the heating on full blast (it was winter) and whenever I parked the car at home, I would put kitty litter inside and keep the windows open.

This story just came to me thinking about companies pushing unhealthy things upon their personel. In the end, they don't give a fuck about you. They all hide behind company policies or in your case, government mandates. It is truly sad to see how people can exhibit the worst of behaviours just because they can hide behind a bigger entity. I am reading 'the most dangerous superstition' right now and it explains in a very clear way how we got to this point in time.
Mansur
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Mansur »

rusty wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 8:38 am
Newsbender wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:25 pm if we are to assume this is a gatekeeping exercise led by controlled opposition (Stew Peters), perhaps they need around 30% (or whatever) of the population to refuse the jabs in order to give them the leverage they need to ultimately force the mandates. E.g. a "we tried making it voluntary but that didn't work" stance. The more demonstrations and pushback there is, the better for them.
Not sure this is the case. I rather think that Stew Peters (= Stupiders) is another gatekeeping, disinformation, discredit by association asset. He also once featured this pretty young doctor "Carrie Madej" in his show, claiming that the clot shot contains living, unkillable little creatures. Never heard of this again, not sure if she just had a mad dej or if this was done intentionally to madej the waters ...
The circus around mandatory vaccination seems to be a smaller one within the big circus, that is, it seems not on the actual agenda. Such a law may have to expect, among others, certainly not open rebellion, but some palpable anti-government/anti-authority public sentiment. And such a thing doesn’t seem desirable for power, - for what is needed from the respected public is vapid bored nodding shrugging unthinking 'support' - to do as they are told or suggested to do.

Besides the law would be completely futile and pointless as well, considering that practically everyone has voluntarily been vaccinated. If such a bill was ever actually planned, it might be interesting to see the wording of it - how it can't say what it wants to say, its almost certainly intentional vagueness... Like the wording of the 'holocaust laws'... (The only purpose I can imagine is if – as with the holocaust laws – if more circuses are being planned in this, legal, theater. But I don’t see the reality of this.)
________

As to Peters:
One could easily 'crystallize' the dozen or so elements from which a media shill or their runners have the opportunity to build... (something similar to what Nefilimp did in his very insightful 'anticipatory' post.) But it would be fucking boring. Just like this 'documentary' is – and that boredom, if the soundtrack could be mixed down, would be felt by any viewer. (Members already hinted at the extraordinary impact of sound effects, and the 'jump cuts', and similar outrageous tools - deployed of course for the sake of the holy cause).
But it could also be that for those 'average viewers' it is boring enough as it is, i.e. just to the degree necessary to catch with his little unconscious the suggestions that are relevant to him... Perhaps there is nothing here that could be called a 'message', neither in this 'documentary' nor in any other, so perhaps we should be careful what we ourselves are putting into it.
(The farce with the religious terminology and attitude I don't think it's the congregational strata addressed as a 'target group', - it's just a sentimental element or tool, like in Hollywood products, i.e. it's quite obligatory, as if space-filling and used routinely. There is no 'baby to be spilled along with the bath', i.e. any recognizable element of truth, in these things anymore, I’m afraid.)

Newsbender wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 3:25 pm I have little doubt that these jabs are killing and maiming people, however. Just from my own family and small circle of friends we have had one death and several long term hospitalizations as a direct result of the shots. One friend will never work again and a relative who was previously a keen hiker is now permanently wheelchair-bound. None of them make the connection, of course.

Dozens of people I work with are in many cases frequently off sick for weeks at a time since getting boosted. (I am self employed and work for six companies so have a larger than average number of colleagues I work with closely). Since it appears this really is global genocide, I am reluctant to refer to anything that exposes it (even in a limited hangout way) as "fear porn". (Although I could do without the doom-laden, menacing music and jump cuts.)
'Expose' - to whom? For those who actually watch the video, there is nothing new in it. Not because the normal media consumer is fed by other channels, but because practically everyone has heard about this stuff, thanks to the many-many references made in the mainstream. So, though it can't say anything new - it can very well steer or divert real questions in real persons, which may be right in the process of assimilation, from its natural directions.

Then: 'personal experience gained from many people' (and maybe during many years) has in itself no value whatsoever. If it had, one could blindly trust doctors-medics or social workers - - then 'investigating journalists' asf. That is, however, evidently not the case, and that members here still come up with such things is quite a mystery. Quantitative elements do not at all provide or guarantee any insight or its depth correctness reliability. Not in the slightest. (This is perhaps the other side of the 'sentimental element'.)

Lastly, the 'health care' as such is what amounts to 'mass murder'! * (If one is, of course, fond of using bombastic terms - as 'global genocide’ 'genocide on a biblical scale’ etc.) The 'pandemic' has not brought anything new in this respect. Even the new 'killer vaccine' could add nothing. Perhaps only that its 'globality' became somewhat more apparent.

* And we all are taking our share in it in supporting the rhetoric ‘the more money (and work and research, etc.) that goes into the health care system the better for us all.’
_________

In short: people previously died as a result of the virus/pandemic, now it is the one/two/three or I don’t know how many shots. Assuming, of course, 'we make the connection.'
antipodean
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean »

This is an extremely depressing watch.
There was still plenty of time for this baby to receive direct donor unvaccinated blood from 20 plus donors.
But the State thought otherwise as it continues to protect it's Covid vaccination narrative.
https://rumble.com/v1znlny-baby-will-me ... pping.html
Post Reply