Sometimes I'm in the musical mood for "whisper screaming" songs, as I like to call them. One such band is called Tactical Sekt. I've been listening to this song for several years, but only this morning looked at the official video. I think it's fitting for this topic.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53bGw77eR1Q
CGI collapse footage
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 7306
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: CGI collapse footage
*
EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COLLAPSE: WHAT CAUSED IT?
Alright, folks - so just for fun let me ask everyone how they think that the Empire State Building was 'brought down' in 1996:
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
The ESB collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kac6k22XFE
Next, how do you think that the WTC towers were brought down on September 11, 2001?
The WTC collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
*************************************************************
Ok, so for the newcomers to this forum who might not quite grasp the point of this brief 'thought-provoking' post of mine, let me explain :
For decades now, perhaps the foremost / most intense and controversial of all 9/11 debates has been: JUST HOW were the WTC towers brought down?
Of course, every single opinion and theory put forth by countless 9/11 "truther groups" concerning this particular matter has been based on the available VISUALS of the WTC collapses.
But what if ALL the available visuals (still pictures & motion pictures) depicting the WTC collapses were crafted with Hollywood techniques such as those used in the movie Independence Day (1996)? To be sure, no one has ever discussed about what sort of "super-weapons" might have caused the collapse of the Empire State Building - as depicted in that old Hollywood movie - since that would be the silliest / most idiotic debate imaginable!
Now, at this forum we have spent many years methodically examining and comparing the available imagery purportedly depicting the collapses of the Twin Towers - which both appear to magically 'dissolve' into fine dust in mid-air, well before hitting the ground. Of course, such a top-down collapse is a physical impossibility - under all known laws of physics and demolition tecniques - and this is why the use of all sorts of exotic, classified / secret weapons have been theorized by various "9/11 pundits". As we have shown in this forum, however, the problems with those "super-weapon" theories are multiple. Let's take a look at a few of them - with a lucid and rational outlook:
- No covert military operations would rely on any novel, untested weaponry to bring down large buildings in Manhattan. Only the most dependable demolition techniques - such as those used every day to bring down old buildings with - would have been chosen. Nothing is ever left to chance in any military operation - period.
- If the Twin towers had truly been 'dustified' mid-air (as depicted in the available collapse videos), this would completely fail to explain why as many as 7 other buildings were 'mortally wounded' - and were all ultimately fully demolished. Here's from the Wikipedia: "Along with the 110-floor Twin Towers, numerous other buildings at the World Trade Center site were destroyed or badly damaged, including WTC buildings 3 through 7 and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. The North Tower, South Tower, the Marriott Hotel (3 WTC), and 7 WTC were destroyed. The U.S. Customs House (6 World Trade Center), 4 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, and both pedestrian bridges connecting buildings were severely damaged. The Deutsche Bank Building (still popularly referred to as the Bankers Trust Building) on 130 Liberty Street was partially damaged and demolished some years later, starting in 2007." Evidently, the Twin Towers were NOT pulverized mid-air - and did NOT collapse straight down into their own footprints as depicted on TV. Instead, the demolition job was clearly a very messy affair that caused massive 'collateral damage'.
- The extensive analyses (and cross-comparisons) of the available WTC collapse videos and stills performed and documented at this forum over the years have revealed innumerable inconsistencies and aberrations - of various nature - between the various versions of the same. Of course, if all this imagery had been authentic, no such discrepancies between photographic material meant to depict the very same event(s) would exist.
In conclusion, the WTC was - in all logic and likelihood - demolished with ultra-reliable conventional demolition charges; a simple military-grade smokescreen was raised around the WTC complex area before the detonations of the same, thus impeding ANY photographic depiction of the actual collapses.
EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COLLAPSE: WHAT CAUSED IT?
Alright, folks - so just for fun let me ask everyone how they think that the Empire State Building was 'brought down' in 1996:
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
The ESB collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kac6k22XFE
Next, how do you think that the WTC towers were brought down on September 11, 2001?
The WTC collapsing top-down (and horrified people running away on the streets below)
1: Was it military-grade thermite?
2: Was it "Mini nukes"?
3: Was it "DEW" weapons?
4: Was it special movie effects?
*************************************************************
Ok, so for the newcomers to this forum who might not quite grasp the point of this brief 'thought-provoking' post of mine, let me explain :
For decades now, perhaps the foremost / most intense and controversial of all 9/11 debates has been: JUST HOW were the WTC towers brought down?
Of course, every single opinion and theory put forth by countless 9/11 "truther groups" concerning this particular matter has been based on the available VISUALS of the WTC collapses.
But what if ALL the available visuals (still pictures & motion pictures) depicting the WTC collapses were crafted with Hollywood techniques such as those used in the movie Independence Day (1996)? To be sure, no one has ever discussed about what sort of "super-weapons" might have caused the collapse of the Empire State Building - as depicted in that old Hollywood movie - since that would be the silliest / most idiotic debate imaginable!
Now, at this forum we have spent many years methodically examining and comparing the available imagery purportedly depicting the collapses of the Twin Towers - which both appear to magically 'dissolve' into fine dust in mid-air, well before hitting the ground. Of course, such a top-down collapse is a physical impossibility - under all known laws of physics and demolition tecniques - and this is why the use of all sorts of exotic, classified / secret weapons have been theorized by various "9/11 pundits". As we have shown in this forum, however, the problems with those "super-weapon" theories are multiple. Let's take a look at a few of them - with a lucid and rational outlook:
- No covert military operations would rely on any novel, untested weaponry to bring down large buildings in Manhattan. Only the most dependable demolition techniques - such as those used every day to bring down old buildings with - would have been chosen. Nothing is ever left to chance in any military operation - period.
- If the Twin towers had truly been 'dustified' mid-air (as depicted in the available collapse videos), this would completely fail to explain why as many as 7 other buildings were 'mortally wounded' - and were all ultimately fully demolished. Here's from the Wikipedia: "Along with the 110-floor Twin Towers, numerous other buildings at the World Trade Center site were destroyed or badly damaged, including WTC buildings 3 through 7 and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. The North Tower, South Tower, the Marriott Hotel (3 WTC), and 7 WTC were destroyed. The U.S. Customs House (6 World Trade Center), 4 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, and both pedestrian bridges connecting buildings were severely damaged. The Deutsche Bank Building (still popularly referred to as the Bankers Trust Building) on 130 Liberty Street was partially damaged and demolished some years later, starting in 2007." Evidently, the Twin Towers were NOT pulverized mid-air - and did NOT collapse straight down into their own footprints as depicted on TV. Instead, the demolition job was clearly a very messy affair that caused massive 'collateral damage'.
- The extensive analyses (and cross-comparisons) of the available WTC collapse videos and stills performed and documented at this forum over the years have revealed innumerable inconsistencies and aberrations - of various nature - between the various versions of the same. Of course, if all this imagery had been authentic, no such discrepancies between photographic material meant to depict the very same event(s) would exist.
In conclusion, the WTC was - in all logic and likelihood - demolished with ultra-reliable conventional demolition charges; a simple military-grade smokescreen was raised around the WTC complex area before the detonations of the same, thus impeding ANY photographic depiction of the actual collapses.