Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

This is to the Norway lurkers and posters, professional and amateur levels of interests.

I was thinking earlier today of an analogy that might make you understand the skepicism about the events alleged to have taken place on July 22.

You are probably not aware that there is a similar type place in America. It is called Deer Island.
It lies in the St. Lawrence seaway between America and Canada. It is owned by The Skull and Bones Society, a fraternity of Yale University. It trains up and forms power networks for future politicians and businessmen. If the news here had come on one day to inform us that 69 people were killed on Deer Island under the exact circumstances as Utoya, we would view this with a good deal of raised eyebrows, and skepticism, believe you me. And I really have a hard time trying to figure out the apathy and acceptance, with NO substantiating evidence that Norwegians have regarding the alleged incident.

http://boldtcastle.wordpress.com/fun-fa ... er-island/

What was the basic level of knowledge of Utoya's existence, and the activities there prior to news reports? Did you look at one another and think where is it? Or was it a household name?

I am relating the two because there seems an overt link of Utoya to the Rose Croix of Scottish Rite Freemasonry as has been talked about on this thread and demonstrated in your press pieces regarding it.

*
Isabel Victoria Green Sogn (age 17)

As I browsed through the 'victim' portraits posted at the various OSLO 7/22 memorials, I was wondering why I always kept finding versions of Isabel's portrait in such dreadfully low resolution:


I then bumped into a rare, higher resolution version. I can now see why the lower quality version is 'the preferred one' to be found on most memorials. It is undeniable that 'Isabel' has been sloppily inserted over this pretty fjord scenery (btw, does she look 17 years old?):


Do I really dare say "undeniable"? Yes. Here I have only applied an 'invert' function and toggled with a blue filter - in order to highlight the problems seen in the original image:


See, naysayers keep complaining that the burden of proof is on us - as far as photo analyses are concerned. I beg to disagree, once and for all, with this recurring objection: the artifacts seen in the above image has - objectively speaking - no rational explanation other than that it has been digitally manipulated. The burden of proof lies flatly with the author of this image - should he/her ever be confronted with this question in a court of law. Of course, his/her lawyer might shout "objection, your honor!"... But, of course, it will be up to the judge to concede or reject said objection. Now, such a courtcase would have to rely on a panel of photo/video professionals - and to ensure that such a panel is perfectly legitimate and independent will undoubtedly constitute the biggest challenge of all. However, for naysayers to endlessly object that "detecting photographic aberrations doesn't prove anything" is nothing but rogue and supercilious intellectual dishonesty.

To be sure, the ridiculous downgrading of supposed family-portraits of terror victims is nothing new: a vast number of 9/11 vicsims were (and still are) shamelessly represented in the official memorials with atrocious pictures such as these: http://septemberclues.org/vicsimripiculous.htm

You know...I just can't help it : I simply do not believe that a single family in the entire world (be it in 2001 or in 2011) would ever allow their deceased loved one to be commemorated with a "portrait" such as this:

Here is Isabel's (or Isabell) MySpace from back in the day. http://www.myspace.com/368703886.

She sure has changed. Let's see, last post July 29 no year specified? This is such a bizarre page.
I have looked at dozens and dozens and dozens of these pages in my searches and NEVER has Tom's pic looked like that even.

But, other dates indicate this was (supposed to be) 2008 which would make her 14 at the time.
But, some pics to look over but only 2 friends. :_(

OK see if there is anything useful amongst these pics.

.

Mudkipz wrote:Judging from the photos above was our vicsim friend a Sephardic Jew? just playing a hunch.

No, that would not be a good hunch. The two branches of modern Jews are Ashkenazi and Sephardim. The Ashkenazi all went from the ancient Khazar empire in the Caucasus Mountains - where Georgia is located - to Eastern Europe and the US. All modem-day Zionists are Ashkenazi, and thus have no connection at all to God's chosen people, aka modern-day Palestinians.

The Sephardim are the much darker-skinned sub-Saharan 'black' Jews, who hold no power or influence in the modern world. Even the Jews don't like darker-skinned Jews.

fbenario wrote:

Mudkipz wrote:Judging from the photos above was our vicsim friend a Sephardic Jew? just playing a hunch.

No, that would not be a good hunch. The two branches of modern Jews are Ashkenazi and Sephardim. The Ashkenazi all went from the ancient Khazar empire in the Caucasus Mountains - where Georgia is located - to Eastern Europe and the US. All modem-day Zionists are Ashkenazi, and thus have no connection at all to God's chosen people, aka modern-day Palestinians.

The Sephardim are the much darker-skinned sub-Saharan 'black' Jews, who hold no power or influence in the modern world. Even the Jews don't like darker-skinned Jews.

Many of the arab jews fall under the bracket of sephardic. The Ethiopians as far as I am aware tend to be in their own subset.

I'm not a novice in terms of education in the Jewish culture, my point was that they appeared more olive skinned and were wearing headscarves during mourning which if I'm not mistaken is a Jewish tradition.

I would suggest that your understanding of Judaism is somewhat truncated, whilst you are correct that the Ashkenazi's are of Russian descent and the Sephardim tend to be darker they are not in fact the Ethiopian Jews. They are being systematically eradicated from Israel through sterilization and are generally being routed out whilst the Sephardim are still somewhat tolerated by the Ashkenazi ruling class mainly as a workforce. They are however more commonly used as Mistravim, etc because they are genetically Arabs in the first place and therefore have an easy time blending in.

Whilst it is correct that the Ashkenazi's run the show they keep some of the lower 'castes' around as minions, 'useful idiots' I believe would be the nomenclature.

Anyway, like I said, I'm not sure how totally relevant this is anyway...

I'm not sure if anyone posted this Brazilian album before (154 pics total from July 22 to August 19), but there are some gems I hadn't seen before: http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... #fotoNav=1
e.g.
Best cartoon image of Utøya yet!

By Mapaid, Lasse Tur/AP Full size @ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... fotoNav=34
(See "Mapaid" details: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p2357206)

Helicopter!

Translated caption: "An injured person is rescued by a helicopter after the attack on the island of Utøya, which is close to Oslo (capital of Norway). A man dressed as police opened fire on a gathering of young people connected to the Norwegian Labour Party. Both this incident and the bomb that exploded in Oslo have been combined actions, said Norwegian police." by Scanpix, Hakon Mosvold Larsen/AP
@ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... fotoNav=35

Another view of the vans & rescue party

Caption: "Rescue team is searching the island of Utoeya. The two attacks that hit Norway on Friday (22) left several dead, police say." by Kristoffer Overli Andersen/Scanpix/Reuters
@ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... fotoNav=48

Sim soldiers (with extendable forefingers!) in sim street near Gina Tricot store:

By Berit Roald/EFE
@ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... fotoNav=49

Sim barge transporting vicsim families to toy island:

August 19. By Fabrizio Bensch/Reuters
@ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... otoNav=154

What a bunch of Shoop Shoop da Whoops!

Interesting, that site apparently blocks attempts to save an image (have to do a screenshot instead)

Maat wrote: Sim soldiers (with extendable forefingers!) in sim street near Gina Tricot store:

Seems like Gina Tricot is getting a decent return from her sponsorship package deal!




******************************************

Wooh! Gina Tricot's skully tricots should sell like hot dogs by now ! Proposed slogan: "Wrap yourself in skullduggery"

Is that supposed to be vicsim Porntip Pamela Ardam?

simonshack wrote: Wooh! Gina Tricot's skully tricots should sell like hot dogs by now ! Proposed slogan: "Wrap yourself in skullduggery"

Perfect!

Check out # 84: Breivik 'escort car':

25 July 2011 Reprodução/VG
@ http://noticias.uol.com.br/album/110722 ... fotoNav=84
with number plate, DK 90297
Ahem, D= 4, K=11th & 9+2+9+7=27=9
4 (for) 9/11 ?

Ha! Also a "Da-Lite 90297 Projection Screen"
http://www.visualapex.com/Projector-Scr ... mber=90297

I like the internal lighting of the rear right wheel. It is always good to light up your rear underside! The tire seems in good condition. The police agent up front right appears shaking drunk. He forgot to smile when photo was taken.

Heiwa wrote:
I like the internal lighting of the rear right wheel. It is always good to light up your rear underside! The tire seems in good condition. The police agent up front right appears shaking drunk. He forgot to smile when photo was taken.

Breivik does not suffer from the effects of motion blur apparently!

/

reel.deal wrote:

brianv wrote:Breivik does not suffer from the effects of motion blur apparently!

Indeed... also impossible to tell whether he's the 'Lord of Darkness'; or the 'Illuminated One'...

And with this, ladies and gents, we have the ultimate proof that the Breivik-in-Police-Jeep images are incontrovertibly phony. Any reader of this forum should - by now - understand just how bogus the Oslo Attack was - and just how much photo analyses can help us understand its bogusness.


What we see here are just digitally crafted images: the sharp one is a still picture published all over the world - and the blurry one is a frame extracted from a video published all over the world. Judge for yourselves (hint: the rear window reflection with the four neon stripes). There is only one rational explanation for these two images (as overlayed in the above gif) to exist: they have both been created digitally. They cannot be real images shot by a photographer and a videographer standing in the exact same place at the exact same time.

Thanks, reel deal: top notch episode ...

Could it be? Could they possibly have churned out their worst "job" yet? I don't know, but this http://n.i.uol.com.br/ultnot/album/1107 ... _f_084.jpg surely has to be among their absolute worst bungles yet, and that's saying something.


The car behind Breivik's "Mystery Machine" (nickname from http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p2358233) seems odd to me: too small in relation to Breivik's car (I'm guessing that during the perp office PS sessions, the size issue was brushed off by ensuring the drones that the suggested perspective in the image is enough of a justification for the oddly small looking car) and just generally looking very artificial and pasted-on.


Hmm, maybe Andersim thought that the "mini-car" was liquorice and decided to get a bite?



There also appears to be an Easter Egg/hidden message of sorts next to Breivik's head, though it required flipping the image horizontally to see it (also used an unsharp mask filter to sharpen it up a bit):

The upper big-lettered word looks like HANDLING or HANDLINGEN.

In Norwegian, handlingen is the definite singular of handling which means (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/handling#Norwegian):

Etymology
From the verb handle

Noun
handling
an act, deed
action
the plot or storyline, in a work of fiction
shopping; the action of visiting shops