Re: The (non-religious) dinosaur hoax question
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:40 am
Never heard of them, but sounds like a good direction. Hopefully.
Which has the date Lux mentioned. Seems like he's popped up out of nowhere or was campaigning aggressively for his site. Hoping for the best. This is a subject I'd really like handled well in contemporary culture.Yesterday evening, in a snit of hasty grumpiness, I deleted a narticle authored by bon 31.193.141.239 on this guy. Twice. The second one was a tiny lame attack stub, but the first one resembled this current iteration, somewhat. Is this Robbin Kofoed character at all notable or influential? His site looks like a link farm for Infowars and Natural News. If there is any original content there, it is well hidden. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)


There's not much to this story, I just thought it would be a good idea to add it to the collection of hoaxes that pertain to fossils. If this story is true, one must ask:Beringer's Lying Stones (Lügensteine) are pieces of limestone carved into the shape of various animals, discovered in 1725 by Professor Johann Bartholomeus Adam Beringer, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Würzburg. Beringer believed them to be fossils, and because some of them also bore the name of God in Hebrew, suggested that they might be of divine origin. In fact, he was the victim of a hoax, perpetrated on him by his colleagues ex-Jesuit J. Ignatz Roderick, Professor of Geography and Mathematics, and Johann Georg von Eckhart, privy counselor and university librarian. Upon discovering the truth, Beringer took his hoaxers to court, and the scandal that followed left all three of them in disgrace.
Some of the stones are now on display at the Oxford University Museum, and Teylers Museum in the Netherlands.












A chicken embryo with a dinosaur-like snout instead of a beak has been developed by scientists.
That simple, huh? Okay! If you say so! Any chance the public can observe this first hand and up close to see for ourselves?They found that birds have a unique cluster of genes related to facial development, which the non-beaked creatures lacked.
When they silenced these genes, the beak structure reverted back to its ancestral state. So too did the palatal bone in the roof of the mouth.
To make this genetic tweak, Bhullar and his colleagues isolated the proteins that would have gone on to develop beaks. Then they suppressed them using tiny beads coated with an inhibiting substance.
When their skeletons started to develop inside the eggs, these animals had short, rounded bones instead of elongated, fused beaks that bird skeletons have.
"By affecting this early protein you are actually altering gene expression," added Bhullar.
As if scientists have any clue whatsoever how to measure such things! What a joke!The shift from snouts to beaks happened well into the evolution of birds, 40-50 million years after Archaeopteryx, says Benton.


