Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

I've yet to find a photo depicting Bauman's severed leg, was it blown to dust like 911 tower victims? Has anyone seen it lying in the street? For the photo experts you'll LOVE these, an extensive collage of widescreen blown up shots from all angles, the best I've seen, have FUN with your debunking, the're Ripe For Criticism!
http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston ... -bombs.htm

omega wrote:analucia, don't forget that any images purporting to be a reveal of the big fakery can often themselves be falsified, to include red herrings, in a double or even triple bluff

The more confusion created, the longer it takes to unveil the truth, by which time multiple 'truths' will have been established and destroyed as needed

Yes, but not necessarily 'destroyed.' What would be the point of the perps destroying their own established multiple 'truths' or allowing other 'truthers' to destroy them easily ? They've got many people out there deliberately leading the pushing of multiple falsehoods or partial-truths at each gatekeeping level for as long as they can. As long as they can make everything (or multiple 'truths') believable, they can keep the closest approximation of the truth or whatever is actually knowable from reaching the wider public consciousness.

A very annoying longtime disinformation specialist was brave enough to define for the good of all humanity exactly how his own job and those of others of his ilk was done a few years ago (whether as direct agents or useful idiots, the result being the same):

"The objective of disinformation is not to convince you of one point of view or another, it is to create enough uncertainty so that everything is believable and nothing is knowable. " -- Jim Fetzer

simonshack wrote:

Surely, another motive for staging those recurring "9/11-style" (minor) psyops - Tucson, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, etc - must be some form of damage control, i.e. to cover the asses of the aforementioned perps who, of course, have been caught with their pants down pulling off the 9/11 hoax with prefabricated computer imagery. See, we can debate this forever, but I frankly don't think they were so keen/prepared/or purposely dropped clues for us to expose their primary method of mass deception. It may sound counterintuitive for them to keep at it (staging fake terror events with fake imagery and fake victims) - but it's not: once you start spinning a big flywheel of lies, your only choice is to keep it spinning. The perps cannot afford to stop it - and they know it. What they CAN do, however, is to use the wheel's momentum to keep the public hypnotized by its circular motion.

Exactly. They have to keep on doing them to keep the illusions or the 'multiple truths' alive at all times so that everything stays believable and nothing becomes knowable. The whole purpose of doing these PsyOps (or maybe even a few real false-flags now-&-then) is to keep the confusions afloat so that the arrival of the knowable upon the consciousness of a large enough cross-section of the world's population is postponed indefinitely year after year into the future. Therefore they plant plenty of red herrings, false leads or deliberate mistakes to cover for the many inevitable real mistakes they cannot help always also making.

Brilliantly summed up, teriyaki taryaki.

Brutal Metal wrote:I've yet to find a photo depicting Bauman's severed leg, was it blown to dust like 911 tower victims? Has anyone seen it lying in the street? For the photo experts you'll LOVE these, an extensive collage of widescreen blown up shots from all angles, the best I've seen, have FUN with your debunking, the're Ripe For Criticism!
http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston ... -bombs.htm

I just came across this article. Maybe this was one of Bauman's.

"Somebody's leg flew by my head," a spectator, who gave his name as John Ross, told the Boston Herald. “I gave my belt to stop the blood.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/16/ex ... z2SM2FxWtP

A good resumé in français

http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/M ... 17795.html

sunshine05 wrote:

Brutal Metal wrote:I've yet to find a photo depicting Bauman's severed leg, was it blown to dust like 911 tower victims? Has anyone seen it lying in the street? For the photo experts you'll LOVE these, an extensive collage of widescreen blown up shots from all angles, the best I've seen, have FUN with your debunking, the're Ripe For Criticism!
http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston ... -bombs.htm

I just came across this article. Maybe this was one of Bauman's.

"Somebody's leg flew by my head," a spectator, who gave his name as John Ross, told the Boston Herald. “I gave my belt to stop the blood.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/16/ex ... z2SM2FxWtP

He administered his belt to the leg which flew past his head? Who is the the somebody?

Hi, everyone. This is my first post. My introduction is at http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p2384131 .

There is much ground to cover, and I will share my initial thoughts in another post, but I wanted to point-out a couple of items in reply to a previous post.

JLapage wrote:

A law enforcement official said that mobile phone service was shut down in the Boston area to prevent any potential remote detonations of explosives. Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -line.html

So no mobile phone service was available and yet we have this:

source: caption:"Explosions At 117th Boston Marathon
BOSTON - APRIL 15: People on Boylston Street check their mobile devices for news of the explosions near the finish line at the 117th Boston Marathon. (Photo by Jim Davis/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/1 ... de=2345484

Notice the woman in the jean jacket has two elbows. The fatso next to her has a see through fat belly. By the way, I have seen few other photos showing 'people' with cell phones pretending to take pictures or to watch the news just like the above picture.

The second elbow belongs to a woman standing behind her, in a white sweatshirt. And the see-through fat belly is actually a stack of plastic cups on a table in the foreground (a black drinking straw can be seen inside the topmost cup).

GabeLager replying to JLapage? Another tag-team?

brianv wrote:GabeLager replying to JLapage? Another tag-team?

What are you implying? Is JLapage a known "agent"? I was simply pointing-out that his analysis of the photo in question was, quite frankly, weak and ill-conceived.

GabeLager wrote:

brianv wrote:GabeLager replying to JLapage? Another tag-team?

What are you implying? Is JLapage a known "agent"? I was simply pointing-out that his analysis of the photo in question was, quite frankly, weak and ill-conceived.

Dear GabeLager,

May I suggest, instead of reacting to a member's perfectly reasonable suspicions, that the best way to dispel any mistrust would be by posting the insights you have stated (twice now) that you have to offer regarding the "Jeff Bauman" character simulation. Having built up the suspense, it seems about time you delivered your "gift", does it not?

GabeLager wrote: I was simply pointing-out that his analysis of the photo in question was, quite frankly, weak and ill-conceived.

Thanks, Gabelager - I also found this latest image analysis rather useless.

But I don't suppose you signed up to this forum just to comment on that image?

We do encourage our members to contribute with findings of their own. Please do so before you start reviewing / opining about other members' contributions. Thanks.

You may start by responding to the "p.s" message I sent you in my welcome mail :

simonshack wrote: ps: I'd be curious to know what your personal definition of a 'smoking gun' is.
If you are proficient in image analyses, I trust you will agree that - just like 9/11 - the Boston affair has its fair share of problems on that front.

GabeLager wrote:

brianv wrote:GabeLager replying to JLapage? Another tag-team?

What are you implying? Is JLapage a known "agent"? I was simply pointing-out that his analysis of the photo in question was, quite frankly, weak and ill-conceived.

Are you implying JLapage is a known agent? Nice start to your internship!

I was commenting on the similarity in names [ GabeLager - JLapage], and that you chose to comment on that particular post as an introduction. Strange how my mind works sometimes.

I agree with most here in that Jeff Bauman should be an area of intense focus. Of all the inconsistencies, those relating to this man (if he is, in fact, a man -- or two) are some of the most glaring, in my opinion.

Check-out Jeff's hair in the well-known "wheelchair photo":

http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston ... pict86.jpg

Here is a very similar photo, but from a slightly different (more straight-on) angle that shows more sunlight on his hair than the previous photo:


http://now.msn.com/boston-marathon-bomb ... -attackers

(Has anyone found a higher-resolution version of this photo?)

This dude has some pretty "nappy" hair, for lack of a better word. Look at his hair in every other picture:


Not nappy.



Nope, still not very nappy.



Trying hard, but no nappiness just yet.



Mmmm, nope.


Nope.



I just don't see it.

Such Clutter and Spam. Have you nothing to bring to this discussion?

Thanks, brianv, your remarks are making me feel welcome already.

You don't think the discrepancies in Bauman's hair are important? If not, why?