That's all I have to say.
We knew the fake 9/11 truthers were a small tight-knit group that all knew each other, seemingly held meetings about the very subject of downplaying your
research through public scams and limited hang-outs that resemble September Clues
' authenticity without actually being such, and possibly
contributed to the hoax in some way besides their gatekeeping operations; but, could it be that some of the actors and actresses who play "Jim Fetzer", "Ace Baker", "Judy Wood" and others like them also help write the fake memorials
in the first place? It would certainly explain their shoddy handiwork and mocking tone.
To be clear and fair, I don't think just one example of it (even as good as this one is) is evidence enough. We must try to treat this discovery with some reserve and skepticism, since clearly the 9/11 debacle is filled with manipulation and red herrings. And it's certainly bad enough that they keep pretending not to understand the implications of totally CGI fake terror-drill "terrorism" pseudo-events in the face of all
the evidence that the "9/11 news footage" and "amateur footage" are as computer-animated and patently fake as a singing and dancing three-and-a-half dollar bill. The purposeful ignoring
they do, the deafening silence they perform
, and the media dance of talking in circles about anything but the totally fake footage
is almost evidence of their criminal involvement enough. But this must be a truly embarrassing implication. It's almost as if they tried to "kill off" a character from the "Simon family" because they realized her backstopping was incredibly weak and linked so distinctly to Phil's own partner. So they just said "oh, she died", but if that's so, how would they hope to erase these photos from the Internet? I guess they just couldn't figure out a way. Is this a tech-savy intel attack — they are hoping to "tie in" word searches of "Simon" and "9/11" with "aww, poor Phil Jayhan"
instead of the groundbreaking September Clues
research? I think it's a possibility. It's sad, but what choice do they have? They would have to deliberately, blatantly
block access to CluesForum.info and SeptemberClues.info, instead of slyly banning its discussion from social media, squashing several of its forms on YouTube before finally realizing their censorship was getting too crass and obvious, manipulating the viewing numbers and promoting "limited hangout" forums like "Above Top Secret" and "Democracy Underground", not to mention creating their own endless swirling eddies of pointlessness like the "Pump It Out" forum (pump out what
This really sums up their involvement in a tight, neat, little package, doesn't it? His name seems to be joining the ranks of the other major gatekeepers. He is known to be attacking Simon ad hominem
, trying to drag us into their simulated drama efforts, and now associated with fake memorial passages for the vicsims (simulated victims of 9/11) and generally supporting the idea that the sims are real people who went into hiding somewhere. All to cover up the technological fact of 100% INVENTED COMPUTER-ANIMATED PERSONS THAT DO NOT EXIST
used to puff up any
given government PsyOp of late, including astronaut adventures, Senator disasters, school and public shootings, Ebola, car wrecks, celebrity happenings, heroic "whistleblowers" (that just serve as extensions of unsavory foreign policy anyway). You name it, they want to fake it and control the public dialogue
on all matters
. Why? Who knows? Maybe, we are just coming to realize how important it is for large governments to do this in order to prevent uprisings from happening. They are fine with the bottom of the pyramid quaking, changing hands, getting bloody, but not the top.
It's amazing that we are even allowed to exist and talk about this problem, and the need for a true change of some kind, except that they cannot embarrass themselves by stooping so low to our level and acknowledging all these discoveries and realizations people are having about how shallow our system has been for centuries. And we also know they have
tried to take us down. With groundless threats of copyright lawsuits, threats of violence masked as "lone angry Internet users", intimidation, mockery, deliberately increasing the signal of other 9/11 topics so that we are drowned out by sheer noise, and other tactics of trying to make us disappear while keeping it as hidden
as they can that there is an effort — a concerted, multi-pronged effort — to make this discussion "just go away" via piecemeal attack.
At least, to me, it seems clearer and clearer the "Phil Jayhan" character is played and controlled by just as much a propagandist gatekeeping acting team as Michael Moore, Alex Jones, Richard Gage and so on, etc. I'd be curious to know when the "Simon family" first made its appearance on the 9/11 scene. Was it after 2007, when the first September Clues
videos came out?
Yes, I realize I am underlining September Clues
a lot, but I think it's important to point out what this little "psychological drama" is trying to downplay, even though it's also grammatically legitimate to underline movie titles. Everyone who stumbles on this topic by accident, and who is wondering what we are going on about (I am hoping searches bring up this topic) should watch the documentary September Clues here
, now, which definitively proves 9/11 was a fake, false-flag military event covered up by an absurd number of completely fabricated pre-rendered animations of "multiple angles". Seriously. Watch it. They have been trying to coyly downplay discussion of this documentary for over 7 years! And please read about the actors and fake victims technology, which we found out may be deployed to invent and endlessly propagate simulations of non-existing people within the digital-media arm of our society: http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims.shtml