Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

The "Oregon Standoff" http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/01/31/ar ... -them.html seemed like a psy-op to me, and then it developed in the "Lavoy Finicum" ambush/shooting, which really seemed like a hoax.

Supposedly the FBI took aerial footage from multiple drone cameras, and the released the footage showing federal agents shooing Finicum from behind.

Here is a video with analysis:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16-IoXHhK4Q

My expert commentary: It looks very fake, with lots of fakery. The flash bombs look like CGI. What do you think?

Here's another video where a live cam caught an aide requesting that two Oregon Standoff guys sign "talent releases":


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjSJEg2Rn_w

One of the main "alt media" stars involved in the "Oregon Standoff" is a fellow named "Pete Santilli":


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvoCGy8MHE4

*

Oh, noo ! Not THAT Pete Santilli ? Well - apparently - YES !

"Santilli Promotes Conspiracy Theories About The September 11 Attacks. On an older version of his website, Santilli labeled himself a "conspiracy realist" and promoted fringe conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks, including that the Twin Towers "were turned into dust in mid-air" and that a "free energy technology" was involved in the attacks."
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/0 ... ned/207723

This is so obviously a "DBA" operation (Discredit By Association) designed to make the general public say: "duh, those conspiracy theorists are ALL rotten apples." This Pete Santilli (which I've bumped into for years - over at Jim Fetzer's place and such dumps) is what may be called a "101-grade cointelpro gatekeeper clown".

This video was published on Mar 8, 2016.

In a video shown at a Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office press conference today, the aerial FBI video of the LaVoy Finicum shooting has been synced with a cellphone video Shawna Cox recorded from within Finicum’s truck.

I don't have time to analyse it but I agree with the earlier comments.
The woman shown at 12:20 from behind is clearly not dressed for the weather.
Why were these "non combatant" women present in the first place, if it was such a dangerous situation? My guess is they are essential to raise the viewers sympathy. That is why the woman's face is on the thumbnail. The thumbnail could have been edited to make her look younger and more innocent.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWLHiU8gYWY

final edit: in the first ten seconds you see one of the women look at the camera. Does she seems disturbed by the fact that she is with an armed group of militiaman, stopped by the police?