Engineering Racism

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby Observer on Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:33 pm

[Note by SCS: Personal image removed, and a couple of paragraph breaks inserted. Otherwise, the content is exactly as it was originally posted.]

simonshack wrote:Now, picture in your mind an island with, say, 5000 inhabitants. On this island, there are five tribes (or "races", if you will) living in peace and harmony: the Yellows, the Reds, the Greens, the Browns and the Blues - each with their own skin color, culture and religion. One day, it is discovered that the Blues tribe's sacred texts contains chapters wherein it is written that they, the Blues, are God's chosen people (i.e. the supreme tribe) and that the other tribes are inferior beings whose only purpose is to serve the Blue tribe - and that every form of deception must be deployed so as to attain this goal. It should be easy to imagine what sort of impact this shocking revelation would have among the other four tribes. In all probability, they would say that the Blue tribe has gone insane - and needs to be confined (as an obligatory safety measure) to their own territory on the island. Most likely, the four tribes would build a wall around the Blues' territory - so as to prevent them from spreading their demented notions of "race supremacy" to their own children. The schools of these four tribes would then teach their children of the dangers of fanatical megalomania, using the example of the Blue tribe's abominable sacred texts. It would be apparent to every constituent of the four tribes that the Blues tribe's peculiar religion promotes the very highest and virulent form of racism, bigotry and sheer hatred (of the "non-Blues" people).

Observer wrote:We "Israel first, Jews first, don't criticize our actions" Ashkenazim are over-proportionately guilty.
Yes, there are other groups to blame but we are over-proportionately guilty of war-initiating hoaxes.

If I make a video about the 9/11 hoaxers, and a high percentage are Ashkenazim, is that "anti-semitism"?
Must we, to avoid hurt feelings, pretend that the 9/11 hoaxers AREN'T over-proportionately Ashkenazim?

How come Ashkenazim "Stop anti-semitism" posters don't post "Stop Ashkenazim from killing real Semites?"

Do I have to remind you the Palestinians whom we are killing everyday are the true Semitic real victims?
Do I have to remind you we Jews have refused for over 3,000 years to criticize our Torah & Talmud racism?
Do I have to remind you our holiest books (Torah & Talmud) say all goyim are sub-jewish animals to serve us?

It's surprising how FEW the percentage of us "supposedly intelligent Jews" actually state the truth like I do.

Observer wrote:A disproportionately high percentage of my fellow Jews refuse to criticize the ultra-selfish, ultra-racist, ultra-murderous, ultra-genocidal acts being committed everyday by 'our people' in Israel.

Simon mentioned (through analogy of course, since there is one group on Earth who has both the extreme desire and the extreme power currently to punish anyone who dares to criticize their actions) the "blues" who wrote that "all non-blues exist only to serve the blues". I'll go ahead and speak directly:

As a Levite, I am a supposed direct descendent of the authors of that particular Original Engineering Racism Psyop called Judaism.

If any readers feel YOUR family has a higher percentage of folks doing bad actions such as writing and refusing to criticize YOUR family's holy books which literally Engineer Racism, then please speak up. I am stating my opinion (this is MY opinion, not at all representative of the 100,000 CluesForum readers as a whole, of course) and my opinion is that my family is statistically over-represented in positive actions such as intellectual/creative endeavors (yay for us that area) and yet unfortunately statistically over over-represented in negative things such as killing our neighbors and creating hoaxes (boo for us in that area.)

Nobody is saying "One group does ALL the hoaxes." What is being said is, "I think my group is creating more hoaxes than we should, and controlling more hoax-pushing media outlets than we should, since we are really such a small percent of the world's population, we shouldn't be so over-represented in the area of hoax-creation." And, I feel that my family (literally, my Levite family, the sons and grandchildren of Levi, the Levite priest authors of the Torah and the Talmud) helped Engineer Racism 3,000 years ago, and I feel my family (literally, my father, who helped Engineer Racism as a head editor at Israel Radio, daily painting the Israeli soldiers as heros, daily painting the Palestinian victims as terrorists) are still disproportionately over-represented in the present day continued efforts to Engineer Racism.

An embarrassingly high percent of Ashkenazi Jews refuse to admit that we are NON-Semitic, which means the whole 'anti-semitic' label is flawed to begin with.

We Ashkenazi Jews are in fact Non-semites who are killing the ACTUAL Semites (the Arab people) in Palestine and elsewhere everyday.

Yes, of course, not ALL Ashkenazim Jews are uzi carrying Israeli soldiers like my father was, but the majority (at the very least a relatively disproportionately high percentage of us Ashkenazi Jews) refuse to criticize the murderous land-grab done by the state of Israel.

Conversely, most white Americans (at the very least a disproportionately high percentage of white Americans) rightly criticize the past actions of the state of America for killing the original inhabitants of America and stealing their land.

If you take the percentage of white Americans who criticize the genocidal land-grab committed by their white European ancestors who came from Europe to America and killed the Red man, and compare that percentage with the percentage of white Ashkenazi who criticize the genocidal land grab committed by our white Ashkenazi ancestors who came from Europe to Palestine and killed the Arab man, it is obvious that there is a disproportional discrepancy.

Of course NOT ALL white Americans criticize their white European ancestors. Of course NOT ALL white Ashkenazi refuse to criticize their white Ashkenazi ancestors. The point being made (regardless of readers' feelings about this reality) is that MOST white Americans are RELATIVELY more honest about the wrongness of "their people's" bad actions, and MOST of my fellow white Ashkenazi are RELATIVELY less honest about the wrongness of "our people's" bad actions.

My Ashkenazi Jewish culture simply places a relatively higher priority on "protecting 'our group' from criticism", and a relatively lower priority on "admitting embarrassing truth about actions done by 'our group'." Non-Jewish western culture comparatively places a relatively higher priority on altruism and truth than our culture does. Does this mean ALL Ashkenazi Jews agree upon and adhere to the general cultural value prioritization ranking? Of course not.

I'm complaining about (with the goal of improving) the current percentage of Ashkenazi who have the courage to say, "Our current cultural prioritization of values, which has remained relatively unchanged and unchallenged by us since we laid them out 3,000 years ago in our holy edicts of our Torah and Talmud, and continued to the present day in our murderous unrepentant genocidal actions in Palestine which we stole very recently, need to be admitted and discussed and improved. We need to update our cultural value system, to prioritize our 'God ordained racial superiority' less, and to prioritize equality with all our human family brothers and sisters more."

This is Comparative Culture, which I studied here in Japan at Sophia University long ago. Perhaps things have changed, but we were fully able to discuss the relative differences between the priorities held by various cultures, as we compared the Japanese culture (which prioritizes the value of harmony-maintaining "tatemae" face-saving-diplomatic silence, hidden feelings, and white lies, more than it prioritizes the value of "honne" truth which although useful in creating positive change also causes lots of verbal and physical fights) with Western culture (which prioritizes the value of the latter more than the former.)

Our Comparative Culture studies never said (nor were ever accused strawman-style of saying), "ALL Western folks are Honest & Violent, ALL Japanese folks are Peaceful & Dishonest." We learned right in the first year, in a class called "Thinking 101", that absolutist ALL/100% sentences are inherently false, and that comparative sentences more/less sentences are perfectly logical. There are relatively more annual cases per capita of violence in America than in Japan. There are relatively more annual cases per capita of face-saving-lies in Japan than in America.

Please save the "anti-semitic" card for someone who says "ALL Semites do bad actions." First off, if you'll re-read more carefully, you'll see that I am reminding you of the fact that Arabs are the real Semites and that I am criticizing most Ashkenazi for refusing to prioritize telling the truth (about the fact that we are not really Semitic, and about the fact that our soldiers are killing the real Semites the Arab Palestinians daily) and instead choosing to prioritize protecting "our people's" image and "our people's" interests, at the cost of the truth.

Actually, if you'll look closely, I'm not even saying most Ashkenazi are doing this. I actually think even the word MOST would be perfectly fine, but I conservatively added the extra-safe limiting qualifier of "a disproportionately high percentage" which means a higher percentage of than should be expected when comparing to other groups.

A disproportionately high percentage of "my family" the Ashkenazi people were responsible for the slave trade, when compared with the percentage of other groups responsible for the slave trade, as explained by Dr. Tony Martin above. It would be foolish to post "That's akin to saying ALL Jews traded slaves, that's 'anti-semitic' and makes CluesForum look bad!"

No, such a foolish strawman post should be sent to the Derailing Room. When I say, "My family members are doing bad things" it does NOT mean "ALL of my family members are doing bad things" no, of course not, it means, "TOO MANY of my family members are doing bad things." Even stated as conservatively as possible: if the annual total-world-average for criminal actions were just 1 out of 100,000 people (meaning, each year, only 1 out of 100,000 world citizens commit a crime) but embarrassingly MY family's annual-average for criminal actions were say 3 out of 100,000 people (meaning, each year, 3 out of 100,000 of my family members commit a crime), then would my complaining about that fact be akin to saying "ALL my family members are criminals!"

No, I'm simply saying, "I don't like the fact that my family members are, per capita, committing three times more crime than the worldwide average. We are statistically disproportionately committing crimes. C'mon guys, cut it out. Be better. Match the average. Try to commit LESS crimes per capita than the world average. And if too many of us refuse to criticize our own actions honestly, then I'm going to criticize our overall lack of honesty about our crimes as well. Don't like all this criticism I'm dishing out? Do my words make you feel bad? Then stop committing so many crimes! Meaning stop creating so many hoaxes. These hoaxes which we profit from are creating wars in which people really die. Yes, yes, I hear the innocent members of the family saying, 'But WE didn't commit any crimes, it's the Power Maniacs among us who are committing those crimes. We as individuals are innocent'." OK, but:

Here's the problem, just like the high percentage of individual law-abiding police officers who DON'T ARREST LAW-BREAKING FELLOW POLICE OFFICERS as much as they should is a crime of silence, so too, the high percentage of individual Ashkenazi family members who DON'T CRITICIZE LAW-BREAKING FELLOW ASHKENAZI FAMILY MEMBERS as much as they should is likewise a crime of silence. I'm speaking up.

I'm not anti-police, I'm not anti-Ashkenazi. I'm against the act of innocent police officers refusing to arrest law-breaking police-officers within the police officer total group. I'm against the act of innocent Ashkenazi refusing to criticize the Semite-Killing Hoax-Creating Ashkenazi within the Ashkenazi total group.

The law-breaking police officers are making all police officers look bad. And the innocent police officers who refuse to arrest fellow officers when needed: well, these innocent police officers are indirectly aiding and abetting the criminal police-officers through their "protect our group" silence.

The Semite-Killing Hoax-Creating Ashkenazis are making all Ashkenazis look bad. And the innocent Ashkenazis who refuse to criticize fellow Ashkenazis when needed: well, these innocent Ashkenazis are indirectly aiding and abetting the criminal Ashkenazis through their "protect our group" silence.

What Simon's post and what my post directly above are saying is: #1 There are many groups in the world, one group had a disproportionately high percentage of their people involved in the slave trade, this is an uncomfortable truth but one which has been covered up, and #2 One of the tactics which has been used to cover up this uncomfortable truth is the "you can't criticize the actions done by a disproportionately high percentage of OUR group, any criticism of actions done by any of OUR people would be: 'anti-semitic'."

Please stop worrying so much about "whether what is being said will 'look bad' to casual readers or not" and focus more strictly on "are the sentences being presented by Dr. Tony Martin and Simon and an Ashkenazi like myself here TRUE or not."

I'm not a 'self-hating' Jew. I'm a Jew who hates and who criticizes the ACTIONS which a disappointingly high percentage of "my family" refuse to criticize. I'm not saying ALL Jews hide the truth about our family's actions. I'm saying a disappointingly small percentage of us criticize our family's actions, actions like: our soldiers killing innocent Semites with our approval, because "our people grabbing this land right here" is (for a surprisingly high percentage of us) more important than the survival of the Palestinian people.

Just in case anyone wants a little visual evidence of this rare Ashkenazi (who is critical of the fact that a disproportionately high percentage of my fellow Ashkenazim refuse to criticize the ultra-selfish, ultra-racist, ultra-murderous, ultra-genocidal acts being committed everyday by 'our people' in Israel and around the world) actually being a Levite:

OK, for those of you that don't know where my family's Original Engineering Racism Psyop started, I'll break it down for you and lay our cards on the table:

My Levite Priest Ancestors evilly claimed (first verbally, and then in writing in the Torah and the Talmud) that God said that Noah was better than all the other humans, and that 10 generations later Jacob was super, and that Jacob's 12 sons are the bestest-humans in the world, actually the only humans in the world, since all you "humans" who are NOT directly descended from those 12 sons are actually not humans at all, you are goyim, which means you are literally mere animals whose only purpose in life is to be slaves for us, the real humans, the direct descendants of Jacob, the Jews. Actually, you are lower than monkeys, lower than pigs. You probably are monkey-pig hybrids.

We, the Jews, remained as pure as possible, check the direct lineage: #1 Adam+Eve, #2 Seth, #3 Enosh, #4 Cainan, #5 Mahalaleel, #6 Jared, #7 Enoch, #8 Methuselah, #9 Lamech, #10 Noah, #11 Shem, #12 Arpachshad, #13 Shelah, #14 Eber, #15 Peleg, #16 Reu, #17 Serug, #18 Nahor, #19 Terah, #20 Abraham, #21 Issac, and #22 Jacob. Pure as possible. All you goyim descend from Shem's brother's Japeth's line, and Shem's brother's Ham's line, which interbred with monkey lines and pig lines too much. But Jacob comes directly from Shem. We are the Shem-ites, the Semites.

And really it's all about Jacob. You are only really an Isra-Elite if your ancestor is one of Jacob's 12 sons (Reuben, Simeon, LEVI, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, [Dinah, a daughter, meh, doesn't count], Gad, Asher, Dan, Naphtali, Joseph, Benjamin).

But the limitation doesn't stop there. Of the 12 families listed there, the super-duperest most-bestest of all the Jews are those who can trace their lineage to Levi, folks like me. Haha. My ancestor Levi was the grandfather of Moses and Aaron.

Levi was so holy and nice. One day, Levi's sister Dinah was seduced by a prince's son, they fell in love and wanted to marry, the prince's son loved Dinah tenderly and his father Hamor said to Dinah's father Jacob basically "Let's bring our tribes together, we'll give any bridewealth amount you desire, let's dwell together in this land forever as one big happy family" but Levi didn't want his sister to marry a non-Shem-ite, this Prince Hamor was descended from Ham, so Levi decided to perceive and paint the seduction of his sister by a non-Jew as a "defilement and a rape" (which of course is the story which we modern folks have received from Levi's descendents, the Levite priests, in their wonderful oral history later written in our holy books, and remember my Levite ancestors are of course perfectly honest historians who never spin nor distort, trust us, we are God's chosen people's chosen people) and thus against his father's wishes, Levi (and his elder brother Simeon, hey Simon, big bro, that's you, haha) shrewdly fool the non-Jew would-be-loving-husband and would-be-uniting-father and the entire town of would-be-future-family-members into "joining the Jewish clan, through adult-circumcision tomorrow, we agree to the marriage proposal" and then, after the the whole town agreed to being circumcised for this highly desired marriage to happen, Levi and Simeon came through and killed every single man in the village, all of whom were too weak to fight back since their foreskins had just been chopped off.

But hey, don't feel bad for that whole town of losers, they were non-Jews and thus sub-human animals worthy of only slavery or extinction anyway, and one of them tried to decrease our family's Jewish angelic genetic purity through mixed-marriage mixed-baby-making, and those losers were obviously too naive to survive since they agreed to our "adult-circumcision-of-the-whole-town" ploy, plus we wanted to steal this Canaanite land in the first place, so they lose, we win!

And in addition to that town, Jacob's GGGGGGGG-Grandson Joshua eventually massacred 6 out of the 7 Canaanite resident tribes, while ever so kindly allowing the 7th group (the Gibeonites) to become our temple slaves. But again, don't feel bad for all those Canaanites we enslaved and massacred, because they are descended from Ham, while we are descended from Shem. Shemites/Semites are simply the best. If we allow you non-Shemites/non-Semites/Non-Jews to be our slaves, you should be grateful we even let you live.

And oh yeah, I almost forgot, in addition to Levi, Levi's sons (Gershon, Kohath, Merari) were also proud massacre-ists: when Levi's Grandson Moses climbed up Mount Sinai for 40 days to write (oops I mean "to receive") the 10 Commandments, Levi's other Grandson Aaron made a Golden Cow Statue (which broke the ultra-important "no statues" commandment, which is far more important than the lower-ranking "no killing" commandment) so when Moses came back he told Levi's son's "God said to kill all the folks who made cow statues" and Levi's sons thus proudly killed 3,000 people that day. The massacre-ist Levi sure raised his massacre-ist kids and massacre-ist grandsons to follow in his footsteps, eh?

But I shouldn't be too harsh when describing Levi's grandson Moses, because Moses did make some wonderful claims. Moses basically claimed that God said "All descendents of Levi (and all descendents of Aaron, but that's redundant since all Aaron was already a descendent of Levi, but anyway) should never actually work, the purpose of all descendents of Levi is to talk to God, the God which Moses saw when he walked into a cloud of smoke from a burning bush, and (get this, I'll bet you non-Jew non-Levi animals never knew this) God said Levites should make a special sacred oil with many kilograms of the best dried top flowers of Cannabis (Kanneh-Bosm is obviously the etymological root of Cannabis, honest etymologists admit this, but dishonest religious truth-hiders would prefer you to believe that Kanneh-Bosm refers to Calamus, anyway) so we Levis are instructed to anoint ourselves (and ONLY ourselves, no non-Levites are ever allowed to touch the sacred Cannabis Anointing Oil, only Levite Priests and Levite Kings, for example David, Solomon, all Levites descended from Levi) to enable us by absorbing through the skin the ability to commune with God.

And not just that, but Moses further explained that we Levites are to live in sacred tent temples in which everything (everything, the candlestick holders, the walls, absolutely everything) must be drenched in this Cannabis oil, and incense dipped in this oil must be burning inside the tent always (yes, always, 24/7, non-stop) which makes the Levite sacred tent temple permanently filled with this cannabis smoke (in modern-day parlance this is called "Hot-boxing") and that the pillar of smoke must always and forever continue to rise from our tents to the heavens, a thick stream of smoke easily seen from miles away. That's the Levite purpose in life, according to Moses, according to the Levite Priests.

And note: only Levites can touch this Cannabis Oil, the punishment is exile (and thus subsequent probable death) for any HUMANS who touch it. Woah, do you see what my Levite ancestors did there? You already know we Levite priests claim all you non-jews are mere animals who deserve to be slaves of Jews, but you probably didn't know until right now that we Levite priests go further to claim, in that sentence right there, that Levis are ABOVE humans, since only the Levite priests can touch the the sacred cannabis oil, and mere humans cannot. Non-Jews are sub-human, Jews are Humans, and Levis are implying themselves to be ABOVE Humans. Levis are the angelic intermediaries between God and Jews.

That's why, in that same chapter, Moses explains that God told him all the other Jews must pay the Levites daily, to support this very important further communion with God which only Levites can perform. Don't even try talking directly to God yourself, by using the sacred Levite Cannabis Oil. Jesus tried that, he anointed himself with the oil (which is why he is called messiah, which literally means "anointed with oil") and he told folks to "go into your closet, close your eyes, and commune directly with god... for free, without paying the lying pharisee religious businessmen middlemen (the Levite priests), commune directly with the creator by yourself!" (for example in the sermon on the mount) and encouraged folks to go direct (both with the communing and the self-anointing) but my Levite ancestors didn't like this at all, since such ideas threatened to reduce our profitable middle-man-to-God business.

So we had the Romans kill this pesky troublemaker who should have never touched anointed himself with the sacred oil in the first place since, #1: "Jesus" (Yeshu Ben Pantera is his real name, according to the Levite Talmud) was only a half-Jew, as his father was a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera, and #2: even though Jesus' mother was Jewish she was NOT a Levite. So, this troublemaker was breaking the "Don't touch the sacred oil unless you are a Levite" rule, plus after he got all high on the oil (we're talking 250 shekels (6 pounds, 3 kilograms) of Cannabis buds folks, not a little 0.5gram puff, we're talking truly hallucinogenic trips here) he was spreading this healing oil on sick folks (which yes, actually does cause miraculous healing in such high-doses) and was encouraging others to go direct to the source like this and stop paying the pharisees for their claims about what God was supposedly saying. So yeah, my Levite ancestors decided that "anoint yourself and commune direct" dude had to go, sorry about that.

But now, thankfully, we move to a new idea, in which I reveal that even though my family name is HaLevi (The Levi) I'm probably not actually descended from those massacre-ist megalomaniac egotistical lying selfish lazy business parasite Levite racist genocidal Torah and Talmud authors. And none of the white Jews (called AshkeNazi, haha, the irony) are actually descended from the actual Jews.

See, as long as one is light colored, one is not Semitic. The actual Jews 3,000 years ago were actual dark Semites. And no, they weren't "kicked out" by the Romans shortly after the Jesus thing. That "Jews kicked out of Israel" lie only started to appear in the late 1800s when white AshkeNazi Zionists started to plan their middle-east land-grab.

It turns out the reason why these Ashkenazi (fake Jews = white Jews = Non-semitic Jews) started calling themselves Jews in the first place is because: in 800AD the Khazarians (a group with a too high percentage of folks specializing in ruthless, shrewd, clever, greedy, conquering, horse-riding, sword-making, empire-expanding, man-killing, woman-raping, and land-grabbing - a special kind of Caucasians with just a very slight amount of Asian DNA mixed in for an extra-tinge of compared to most relatively more hive-mind cold-hearted moral-less selfishness, to picture the looks imagine a southern white Russian but mixed ever-so-slightly with Chinese, so a very particular kind of white with black hair) had a Khazarian Emperor who decided to convert his whole kingdom to Judaism.

He did this because he didn't want to join the Christian team or the Islam team, and so he imported a few actual Jews (the real, Semitic, dark, actual descendents of the real, Semitic, dark, actual authors of the Torah and Talmud) to come teach some Khazarian folks Hebrew and the Jewish customs and all that, and those Khazarians who learned from them became the teachers who taught the teachers who taught all of the Khazarian people how to convert to Judaism.

All these Khazarians chose Jewish family names, for example my father's Khazarian ancestor must have shrewdly chose the most highly ranked name of all the Jewish family names: Levi. Other Khazarians chose the second highest name Kohen. And so on, and so on. Everyone chose a name and "became" Jews. And 400 years later you had a whole country of Khazarians who had convinced themselves that they were, uh, somehow, "descended" from the actual Jews, since, well, after 20 generations of speaking Hebrew and having Jewish names and doing all the rituals, one kind of forgets that it was just a cultural conversion, one starts to imagine that a bunch of Jews must have migrated eastward long long ago.

But no, these Khazarians really didn't have Jewish Semitic DNA, because if they did they wouldn't still be so light colored. Actually, OK, they did receive a TINY injection of actual Jewish Semitic DNA, from the few teachers who were imported in from Israel in 800AD, but that's a tiny amount, proven by the pitifully tiny amounts of Semitic DNA found in AshkeNazi "Jews". This tiny injection of Semitic DNA wasn't enough to darken their skin, but it was enough to give them slightly larger noses with that slight "hook" bend.

So, in 1200AD, when these Khazarians were busy patting themselves on the back for supposedly being "Jews", suddenly even stronger warriors came, Ghenkis Khan and his crew, and thus the Khazarians ran away to North-Western Russia and North-Eastern Europe. By then, their language was a weird mix of Khazarian and Hebrew, which they called Yiddish. And these KHAZArians started calling themselves ASHKenAZi.

From 1200 to 1890 these KhazarianAshkenazis lived in Russia and Europe and continued to believe and follow their "instructions from God, received by their ancestors" which told them to never interbreed with non-Jews, never treat non-Jews as humans, amass money by any means necessary, etc.

They specialized in using lies to buy low and sell high (not producing new things with innovation or sweat, but rather simply using words, lies, to avoid actual work), bribing politicians to get illegal usury made legal, bribing politicians to reduce the amount of principal which banks must keep and thus increase the amount of "other people's money" to profit from further usury/gambling/speculation/market-making/market-crashing, bribing politicians to allow them to be the fiat printers, using literature printing power to fool the non-jew goyim worldwide, controlling military decision makers, media decision makers, political decision makers, sometimes by bribing non-Jews, sometimes by installing hidden Jews, sometimes by installing open Jews.

But remember, all of these "Jews" are basically on average 97% Non-semitic. But wow, their past Khazarian emperor in 800AD really chose the right religion for them to convert to. It was a perfect match. Of all the Semites in Israel, the most selfish killers/enslavers/parasites were the 12 sons of Jacob, and of all the slightly-Asian-whites in southern Russia, the most selfish killers/enslavers/conquerors were the Khazarians. So the Khazarian particular DNA-based behavioral traits really matched the Levite Cultural-based behavior traits which they imported. Those Khazarians really have been living to the fullest the "selfishness is godliness" ideals of the Torah and Talmud, from 800AD to present day.

And as a side note, although they tried their best to not interbreed with non-Jews (for example my Dad's line remained "white with black hair" all the way from Khazaria to my Dad) at the same time some Ashkenazis (probably the most wealthiest of all the Ashkenazis) did pick up a little injection of blonde DNA (probably by interbreeding slightly with Royal whites in Europe, for power alignments) so in the end some Ashkenazis still have black hair, some have brown, some have light brown, some have reddish hair, and a few got lightened up all the way to blond (which is surprising, of course, since blonde babies are supposedly hard to create without both parents being blond, but anyway.)

So then, as mentioned, some of the top Ashkenazi around 1890 decided to start setting up for a future land-grab, and instead of grabbing Georgia Russia (their actual true homeland) they set their sights on grabbing Israel (at the time called Palestine, populated by Palestinians.) The first thing was to start printing false claims that "We Jews were all kicked out of Israel by Rome, that's why we're scattered throughout Europe and Russia!"

Then, side note, they committed the Genicides of Armenians and Russians and Ukranians, but hey that's just massacring 50 million pesky non-Ashkenazis so no big deal right. And then, as folks here know, these Ashkenazis wanted to take attention away from the reality that they are the world's most ruthless genocidal killers, so they set up the grand "we are the world's most victimized victims of genocide" lie in Germany.

So they they attacked Germany financially, turning all German savings to worthless paper to be burned for a night of warmth, and then installing their supposedly-Ashkenazi-hating but actually secretly-Ashkenazi "Nazi leaders". This Germany project (like all their projects) have not just one isolated goal but many concurrent profitable goals for themselves - i.e. the post-Hitler "forever victim" profit of being able to outlaw all future criticism of their actions from here to infinity, since anyone even mentioning Ashkenazi crimes can be labelled as somehow "like Hitler, wanting to kill all the Jews", plus the post-hitler "we need our own country" profit of being able to go grab Palestine and eventually all of the middle-east, since if you tell them to give back that stolen land you can likewise (again) be labelled as somehow "like Hitler, wanting to kill all the Jews", plus the added profit of usury profits due to all the loans needed to finance WWII (and for that matter, ALL the various wars which they have initiated and profited from, from the the time first Jewish bank was established, through the present day.)

And it worked: the Zionists' claims of "we Ashkenazis are Jews who were kicked out of Israel long ago", combined with the financial attack upon Germany which helped lead to (the Zionists' secret inside-man) Hitler being able to take power, combined with the absolutely fake "extermination of 6 million Jews" hoax, resulted in: the public acceptance of the "we Ashkenazi Jews need our own country, so let us 'return to our ancestral home' by allowing us to steal Palestine from the Palestinians" goal, as well as those other goals mentioned above.

Now here comes the most surprising part of this sinister long-term-planned Zionist-land-grab, as proven in Shlomo Sand's book "The Invention of the Jewish People", written after he safely obtained tenure as Emeritus Professor of History at Tel Aviv University: he proved (quite convincingly in my opinion) that Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from the original Jews who lived in that area 3,000 years ago. Obviously, since we're genetically white. And oh yeah, the 'Jews were kicked out of the area 2,000 years ago' story only appeared in history books quite recently, the old respected history books don't claim such any extraordinary 'kick-out' event ever occured in the first place. How could it. That 'kicked-out' story started when white Zionists decided to start planning a long-term land-grab. So, what happened when Shlomo Sand released his well-sourced well-proven revelation? Israel didn't deny the truth of it, but rather they basically quietly replied, "M'eh, so what, so what if our constitution talked about 'right of return' and we aren't really returning, since we have been RELIGIOUSLY Jewish and CULTURALLY Jewish for 1200 years, it doesn't matter if we aren't really Semitic', they didn't even try to refute his revelation that Ashkenazi are basically non-Semitic genetically, they didn't even try to refute his revelation that no history books document any mass migration of Jews leaving that area in the first place, they simply said, 'Meh, so what, where here now, just like whites took over America, what are you gonna' do, white Europeans aren't gonna' give America back to the simple original inhabitant losers, and we white Jews aren't going to give Israel back to the simple original inhabitant losers the Arabs, so shut up Shlomo Sand, nobody cares about your revelations, we're not even going to bother forging genetic refutations or forging historical refutations in response to your book, we're simply going to label you a 'self hating Jew' and be relatively quiet about you so that your revelation isn't heard or read by many people." - not ONLY does it turn out the Ashkenazis are fake Jews who merely culturally converted to Judaism (they are 97% Non-semitic light-skinned caucasian-asians from the Southern Russia Khazarian Empire who then moved to Russia and Europe and thus were then even further lightened by centuries of living there) but it ALSO turns out the original real Semitic Jews who actually lived in Israel and who actually wrote the Torah and the Talmud were never kicked out of their home at all: the original real Semitic Jews simply over time culturally converted to Islamism!

Descendents of Khazarians (fake Jews, Non-semite caucasians, who merely converted to the Judaism religion and culture in 800AD) now in the 20th and 21st centuries are daily killing Palestinians (real Semites, descended from the real ancient Semites, perhaps even descended from the real ancient Jews, who surprisingly over thousands of years converted to the Islamis religion and culture.) What an absurdly upside-down situation!

So Ashkenazis are not real Jews. We are not descended from the real Jews of 3,000 years ago. I'm a fake Levite. Or, who knows, maybe the whole Khazarian thing is incorrect, maybe I am indeed a real Levite, directly descended from the authors of the Original Engineering Racism holy books the Torah and Talmud, directly descended from Moses, directly descended from Levi, directly descended from Jacob, Issac, Abraham, Shem, Noah, Seth, Adam. But again, it's confusing, because: if we Ashkenazi are descended from dark Semites, why we are we not dark like real Semitic people in that hot melanin-necessary area are? Did we really lighten up that much during our time in Europe and Russia? Or perhaps were the original Jews who wrote the Original Engineering Racism holy books the Torah and Talmud somehow whites way back then? I really don't know if Ashkenazi Jews in general are actually descended from the real original 3,000 year previous Jews or not. And more specifically, I really don't know if an Ashkenazi "Levite" like me is actually descended from the real original "children and grandchildren of Levi" Levite priest authors or not.



But now bringing this story to things which I DO know, I am embarrassed to say, but I have to say, because I am compulsively honest to a fault: my Dad (who I totally stopped speaking with years ago, due to his refusal to honestly admit the wrongness of his actions) willingly PARTICIPATED in that "kill the Palestinians, so we can 'return to our ancestral home'" project. He was an Ashkenazi born-in-Long-Island Princeton Summa Cum Laude who tells me (but I'm not sure if this is the truth) at the end of Princeton due to being discriminated against by WASPs - they didn't let him into their yacht club, boo-hoo - so he decided in the final months before graduating to suddenly quit Princeton without taking the final tests in protest of such discrimination, and thus even though he was a straight A student he crazily suddenly chose to purposefully not graduate from Princetion and suddenly flew to Israel (but I think the "didn't let me into the yacht club story is not the whole story, I suspect he was recruited by Israel agents within Princeton, but anyway, either way) he suddenly flew to Israel and immediately renounced his American citizenship and joined the Israeli army and became a red-beret uzi-toting paratrooper who helped guard the indirectly-arab-genocide-ing-via-water-diverting Suez-channel (and he claims he never killed anyone, but I don't believe that, I suspect he did what Israeli red-beret uzi-toting paratroopers were trained to do especially back then: parachute into Arab villages in the middle of the night, use the uzis to kill the whole village, then the bulldozers come the next day, and thus Israel's border just grew a little more, mission accomplished, but he claims he didn't do that, we claims he simply guarded the Suez-Canal project and didn't never shot or even shot at anyone), then he became the head editor of the Israel Radio propaganda machine, then he became Assistant to Jerusalem's Mayor Teddy Kollek. So he participated in the military, propaganda, and political, aspects. Then he somehow snuck back into America (probably with help from fake documents from the Mossad, I suspect, he refused to elaborate on how he got back into America without his American citizenship) and then get this: his first job back in America (where he was an illegal alien mind you) was at General Dynamics as a human resources recruiter/gatekeeper (a position which he no doubt was placed into with the express mission of helping Mossad spies to infiltrate that American "Defense" (Offense) bomb-creating bomb-selling war-industry corporation, and again, how does one become a General Dynamics recruiter suddenly, being an illegal alien lacking American citizenship who just returned to America from 13 years in Israel, either General Dynamics had a real lax background check back then when hiring staff, or he must have been provided with fake documents to get that job, which as I already theorized was probably a Trojan-horse style "get even more Mossad spies hired into General Dynamics" role), then he continued to live quietly in America as an illegal alien for the next 17 years doing various non-military-related executive recruiting jobs (Oil headhunting, Investment Banking headhunting, Venture Capital headhunting, etc.) until he finally hired a lawyer and successfully petitioned to get his long-ago-renounced American citizenship back again, and oh yeah, when he finally got his citizenship back THEN that is when he revealed to 15 year old me: "Hey Son, I finally got my American citizenship back, yeah I was living illegally in America all these years, that's why I never took any international vacations your whole life, see, because if I left America even for a weekend I would have trouble getting back in, I never explained this to you since I didn't want to burden you with this secret which as a kid you probably wouldn't have been able to keep quiet about, but anyway I recently hired a lawyer and got my citizenship back, so now I can travel I've decided to do what I've wanted to do for years: move to Japan, so do you want to move with me to Japan next week?" And that's how, at age 15, I moved to Japan. But back to the focus on my former red-beret Israeli trooper Dad:

Since he refused to honestly admit to me that he must have killed arabs as a red-beret Israeli paratrooper, since he refused to honestly admit he must have been a Mossad operative helping Mossad spies be hired by General Dynamics (how else could he have gotten that job in the first place, as an illegal alien, without advanced fake document help), since he refused to admit that all those Non-semitic Ashkenazi "Jews" such as himself had no right stealing land which their Khazarian ancestors never ever actually even lived in, I totally stopped talking to him (which yes, of course, I realize it is a big deal to "disown" one's own father, but I just couldn't continue to honestly smile and talk with such a dishonest person.)

The real last straw was when I discovered the "Ashkenazis are not Semitic" reality. I told my Dad about the Shlomo Sand book and gave him a copy of it, thinking that this revelation would blow my Dad's mind and cause him to realize he made the wrong choice when he moved to Israel, he should have been shocked, he should have said, "Wow, this is right, we're white, not Semitic, all of us white Jews (Ashkenazim) were fooled into 'returning to' and 'taking back through murderous force' and 'holding on to through any means necessary' land which it turns out our ancestors never lived in. We should have invaded Georgia Russia if we really wanted 'to return to our ancestral home", wow son thanks for sharing this with me, I'm ashamed that I was fooled, and I'm sorry that I never investigated or even thought about this truth, if I had known I would have never joined the Israeli army, I would have never even flown to Israel in the first place, and if I had known we white Jews weren't actually Semitic I definitely would have told you son." That's what I was expecting/hoping to hear, something like that. At the very least he should have been surprised. But I was shocked when he casually replied, "Yeah, I know, I've read this book and enjoyed it, and actually I knew this fact long before this book ever came out, yes we Ashkenazim in Israel knew we were obviously Non-semitic, we Ashkenazim in Israel were quite racially discriminatory against the Semitic Jews living in Israel (the real Jews there who look like Arabs), we treated those dark Semitic Jews quite badly, not as badly as we treated the Arabs of course, but we made life quite rough for the dark semitic Jews there, and yes, probably because their very existence embarrassed us white Ashkenazim, those of us in the know knew quite well that all us Ashkenazim were descended from Caucasian converts-to-Judaism, since obviously we were and are Caucasian Ashkenazim, I'm not sure if we originally came from Khazaria or not but that particular location theory seems the most likely, but no son I don't feel bad about anything we Ashkenazi Jews did during the creation and maintenance of Israel which I participated in, we did what we had to do because: we needed a home, who cares about whether we had ancestors in that area or not, when it comes to survival truth doesn't matter so much, everyone needs a country and we were proudly working together to create our own country. I did feel that we went a little too far, which is why I eventually came back to America, but if you are asking me if I feel bad about helping Israel the answer is no and I won't be guilt-tripped by you or anyone else. Thanks anyway for the book, I appreciate the thought."

Great, so not only did my father continue to participate in this genocidal land-grab of Semitic lands by non-semites pretending to be 'returning home', even when he realized over there that he was non-semitic, that realization STILL didn't change his mind about the moraility of his actions. And by the way, the whole reason he renounced his American citizenship and became an Israeli red-beret paratrooper in the first place was: because some White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestants at Princeton didn't let him join their yacht club due to his family name. Oh boo-hoo, what a "victim". So being barred from some silly yacht club at Princeton justifies going and killing a bunch of totally innocent folks elsewhere and stealing their land to create "our own country" to avoid such "racial discrimination".

Why didn't these Ashkenazi "victims" after the defeat of Hitler campaign for their "new, own, country" to be taken from the German "perpetrators". That would make more sense, since your group is claiming, "Germany killed 6 million of us" and the allied forces has taken over Germany, Team Ashkenazi should have said, "OK, League of Nations, we need a home, Germany was really bad to us, so draw a line through Germany and give us half, as repreations, that's our new own country." Or, if not that, then later, when Team Ashkenazi invaders/occupiers over there in Israel realzed they looked nothing at all like the real dark Semitic folks there, when "those in the know" realized all Team Ashkenazi members were merely descended from cultural converts, why didn't they say, "This is immoral, we shouldn't be doing to the Semites what Hitler (supposedly) did to us. Let's instead pool our resources together and purchase a large plot of land from our true ancestral home of Khazaria, currently called Georgia Russia. Let's return home the right way, the moral way." Well, the answer is clear from my Dad's answer on the issue: who cares about the truth, lies and force are perfectly effective means to obtain goals, we got Israel and we're never giving it up. End of story.

Thus my Dad's behavioral traits (partially from Khazarian DNA, partially from Jewish culture) really were disappointing and seem to me to epitimize the lack of moral code from Ashkenazis in general. He refused to ever admit ant wrongness at all about any of his past actions (voluntarily joining the military for starters, and all his Israel-helping actions after that), he refused to admit wrongness about Ashkenazi actions in general (financially attacking Germany in the first place, stubbornly refusing to leave the host country when requested, using media-control to hoax 6 million deaths to justify a murderous unjustified land-grab elsewhere), he refused to give me full disclosure as a child, or even as a young adult, about the fact that we are not actually Semites and that we are not actually Levites (and when I learned elsewhere about this shocking fact, that we are not who we claim we are, that Israel's whole "right of return" sentence in their constitution is entirely a sham, he nonchalantly replied as described above, basically, "Yeah, I know, so what, we needed a country, this 'returning to our ancestral home' lie worked, who cares about the truth, getting what you want is the most important thing in life.") My Dad's immoral "who cares about the truth" philosophy can be seen in the "6,000,000 were gassed" lie, and the "we didn't kill 50,000,000 in Russia/Ukraine/Armenia" lie, and the "You non-Jew whites should forever feel bad about slavery" lie, which by the way, it turns out that only a tiny percent of whites in America owned, between 1% to 3% max, and MOST of those slave owners (not just a disproportionately large percentage, which would be bad enough, but literally 70% of the slave owners in America) were wealthy Ashkenazi Jews. And, it turns out, as Dr. Tony Martin explains quite eloquently, the whole slave trade from capturing to transporting to selling was also done by wealthy Ashkenazi Jews. 'My people'. So all you non-Jew whites don't have to feel bad about slavery anymore. Your ancestors weren't involved. My Ashkenazi (white Jew) ancestors were the ones who did that. And then we used our control of the media (control which started ever since [and even predating] the Gutenberg press) to control the narrative and to paint non-Jews as the slave-masters. Here's a little bonus fact: the slavic people were used as slaves so much in ancient times that that's where the word slaves comes from: slavs. Anyway, back to the point, it's time to come to my conclusion on this topic:

I think my father's Ashkenazi genes (whether Khazarians who took the name Levi, or whether actually descended from the real Levi) are relatively specialized in (having behavioral tendencies toward) being very clever, dishonest and selfish. Thank goodness my mother is non-Ashkenazi. I think my mother's non-Ashkenzi Celtic Redhead genes are relatively specialized in (having behavioral tendencies toward) being very simple-minded, honest and altruistic.

Now my opinion about my genes, and about genes in general, of course, is an example of Racism, since it implies our inherited genetics can increase the chances of displaying relatively specialized behavioral tendencies. I know, folks only like to admit about genes containing physical attribute tendencies, like color or height, and never behavioral tendencies, and that we should only mention positive attributes which became bred over thousands of generations into our ancestors, and we never like to admit any negative aspects of one's ancestors, so sorry about the Racism. The point of my comparing my Dad's genes and my Mom's genes and giving my opinion about what genes I inherited from them, is simply to say: I'm grateful I'm a hybrid with a balance of intelligence and altruism.

And of course, no matter what genes we inherit, and no matter what cultural environment we happen to be born into, it is up to us to use our WILL (the third factor which determines our behavior) because, even more important than the genetic factor and the cultural factor, in my opinion the most important deciding factor which determines who we are (our daily behavioral action manifestation vibration of who we are, which looking back at the end of this body's journey we will see as our total lifetime behavioral action manifestation vibration of what we were in this life) is our WILL.

So regardless of Racial genetic differences and Cultural differences, and regardless of the Engineering Racism Psyops (which the wealthiest 0.01% trying to get us poorest 99.99% to divide and fight each other so that we don't ever take back the wealth they have stolen and which they are using to keep us as slaves), we can still WILL to be as good as we can.

I will to be a better me everyday, I will to be a better role model for my children, and thus regardless of genetic differences and cultural differences and divisional propaganda, this WILL to improve my self (one's self) is the most important moment to moment practice. For myself, and for my Ashkenazi-Russian-Estonian-Italian-Celtic-Basque-Japanese kids: the next generation, who are no longer under the control of the Engineered Racist edicts in the books which my Levite ancestors wrote. My kids know very well that all humans are equal and we are all brothers and sisters. And nobody gets a free pass. If they see ANY of their races being disproportionately represented in the areas of war-initiating or hoax creating, I hope they as adults speak honestly about any such problem, to help solve the problem. I have taught them to go against the Japanese proverb which says, "If something stinks just keep the lid on it. My kids know that if there is a problem, one should and must bring that problem out into the light. Even though it's a tough discussion, to say, "A bunch of my cousins are doing bad things." The point is, by shaming the cousins doing bad things, hopefully they will realize they don't get a free pass just because they happen to be in our family. And hopefully all our family members who silently refused to call out the cousins doing bad things will also feel ashamed for letting the problem ferment for so long. Open the lid, let the light in, make the whole family realize honesty is the best policy. Even if some feelings get hurt. We're trying to prevent wars here. We're trying to create peace here. :)


PS - In this post, I simply spoke truth to power: I criticized my family members who forbade me to criticize them, and I criticized my "innocent" family members who refused to criticize guilty family members. My heart understands and my words make it clear that I am speaking about decreasing my family's crime rate so that it matches the rest of humanity. Any attempts to tear down strawman absolutes which I neither write nor imply (nor think, nor feel) should be summarily sent to Derailing. There's really nothing in this post to argue about, so please don't bother trying. I won't even reply if you do. I'm going on vacation now, for real. B)
Last edited by SacredCowSlayer on Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:06 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Reason: Deleted the personal image, which I am not comfortable with for reasons I will explain when I have more time. The substance of the post is otherwise completely intact.
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:47 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby Mansur on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:41 am

thisisunreal » November 7th, 2018, 9:48 pm wrote:Is racism, not simply an extension of empire or the leftovers of empire? By 'empire', I mean the legal ownership of countries (not the much more serious current non legal, non disclosed ownership of countries by a network of corporations, business interests, banks, funds and dynastic families).

Is it not simply an extension of the strange playing out of history of those that have versus those that have not? ......

I think the very conception of that ownership has changed considerably during the centuries. And just that, extremely corrupted, conception is now one of the main pillar modern "culture" is based on, sometimes seems to be the only one... As you seem to say the same I think - but maybe with taking the conception, our conception of ownership, for granted, our relation to things which hardly differs from that of the robbers and is anything but legal.

In conspiracy language it is carried to the absurd. How does one or a group own a country? Or a kingdom?

Possession of things – and the control over them (power) are two distinct relations.
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby thisisunreal on Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:56 am

My earlier reply to this thread was premature. I have now watched the whole video and was astonished to see that it is yet another textbook case of a top academic and historian shut down. This is exactly what has / had happened to James Baque, Professor Norman Finklestein and David Irving. It does not matter if the aforementioned were right or wrong. It is (in my humble opinion) totally unacceptable to shut people down one by one and remove their voice.

If you are systematically removing peoples voice then there is indeed a) something to hide and b) the ability to perform this gag order shows the inordinate power that exists within academia and wider circles. It also calls into question all the information we receive and whether or not we can make any sensible, informed, rational choices based on that information.

Whilst Tony Martin does not discuss the holocaust you can certainly see how any sensible discussion of the issue has been entirely outlawed and driven underground. Tony Martin's treatment is another clear example that helps to establish a strong trend. This brings the debate (for me) alive again as you have enough top individuals of stature who have been gagged and discredited. There is without question meaty material entirely hidden by legal means, societal means, and obscured by our own fear of mentioning the elephant in the room. The greatest barrier to truth is our own societies willingness en mass to play along with this coerced hush on certain topics.

This cements by feeling that a reading list would help fast track people to get to the bottom of the issue (or indeed any issue on the forum). Censorship and media shaping our mental pathways can be neatly understood by watching or reading just three characters 1.) Tony Martin 2. ) Prof. Norman Finklestein and 3.) David Irving. It seems all three individuals have lived out parallel lives in terms of the hardship they had to endure by vocalising their research.

simonshack » November 14th, 2018, 10:28 pm wrote:Dear Patrik,

You justly linked to a speech by Tony Martin, a very little-known academic whose opinions - in my honest opinion - deserve to be heard, worldwide.

According to Wikipedia, "Tony Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70".

Please spend 1 hour (as I just did) listening to what Professor Tony Martin had to say - the wealth of details in his historical account of the particular "dynamics" behind the horrific slave trade (and more) is simply stunning - and something that we all need to be reminded of. Also, Tony Martin comes through as a totally honest person - and with a fantastically subtle and humorous talker talent :

full link:

Tony Martin's lucid speech is certainly relevant to this "Engineering Racism" thread - as viewed under a historical perspective.
Martin Luther King pales in comparison to this gentleman.

At 17:05 in this video, Tony Martin makes a quite priceless statement:

"I think that if one had to isolate a single tactic, it was a tactic of telling lies - they've elevated 'telling lies' to a very high, artistic form".

At 44:06 in this video, Tony Martin makes another priceless statement :

"Another tactic is, of course, their use of the major media. They become very agitated when one speaks of their control of the media - that's one of the most anti-semitic things that it is possible for anybody to say..."

You should not be surprised for never having heard of Tony Martin. -_-
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:20 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby Mansur on Mon Nov 19, 2018 6:31 am

thisisunreal » November 19th, 2018, 5:56 am wrote:
simonshack » November 14th, 2018, 10:28 pm wrote:Also, Tony Martin comes through as a totally honest person - and with a fantastically subtle and humorous talker talent...

This other lecture by him (linked below) seems to be much more informative (since in the first speech linked by Simon he was dealing almost exclusively with tactics he experienced on the part of Jewish persons/organizations against him.) It contains more of his reasons why and how “Jewish involvement in slave-trade” was dominant. It is prefaced, in a small clip, by Michael A. Hoffmann.

To decide, however, whether it adapts itself organically to a broader view of history or not, is I think wholly up to the listener.

(The same lecture with the original intro by D. Irwing. )

In another lecture he is speaking very-very lengthily about the concentrated and well-organized assault „all the four major Jewish organizations” have made against his person via the greatest newspapers as well as the minutest ones throughout the US and even abroad... Perhaps he was not a „hoax-minded” person, meaning not being aware of the possibility of being used.

Before canonization there is something to do with the advocatus diaboli.

Here is another lecture taken decades earlier. His sentences are almost the same. In the video in Simon’s post maybe he is surrounded by a homely atmosphere… ... pic=7914.0
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby thisisunreal on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:17 pm

Dear Mansur, allow me to respond to a couple of your quotes with my humble opinion, if i may, which I found very interesting.

Perhaps he was not a "hoax-minded” person, meaning not being aware of the possibility of being used.

Tony Martin seems completely unaware of the wider possibilities of censorship. I doubt he would have walked into the fire and suffered almost a decade of defamation had he been aware this could have happened before he started teaching about the Jewish involvement in the slave trade to his history class of 30 students. In addition, at no point is there any hint of conspiratorial discussion on his part. He never makes the connection to the broader picture, although interesting that he does share a platform with David Irving. Perhaps the mental link was formed later or maybe never. Or perhaps the link was formed initially yet like many of us, perhaps he never dared articulate it because of the emotional horror of climbing over that particular wall of tears and the societal rejection. I don't know what he was thinking or thought or thinks on the wider picture. Sometimes things can be known on a very deep subconscious level but take decades to reveal themselves.

To decide, however, whether it adapts itself organically to a broader view of history or not, is I think wholly up to the listener.

It does. You can see that if the owners of the media do not wish their name to be mentioned in connection to the slave trade then they will be totally unwilling to have it connected to other enormous historic affairs in which so much of their current identity rests. I say this with confidence as there are now enough academics who have tackled different areas of Jewish involvement (not exclusively the holocaust) who have been shut down, rubbished, disowned, barred from universities etc.

1.) David Irving (the revisionist denier of the holocaust)
2.) Professor Norman Finklestein (Jewish writer of 'The Holocaust industry') an incendiary book that bemoans the holocaust being used for an ongoing shakedown of Swiss banks. Additionally, the holocaust wall of tears deters anybody from calling out the outrageous behaviour of Israel towards Palestine.
3.) Tony Martin in linking the Jews to the Slave Trade
4.) James Bacque who wrote, 'Other Losses' in which he brings light to a potential holocaust which happened directly after the second world war at the hands of the Allies and affected German troops.

It is worth mentioning that each of these individuals were at the very top of their game before they strayed into alternative undesired narratives. Prof. Norman Finklestein is perhaps the worlds leading authority on the Israel Palestine conflict. He is unemployed for 10 years now and will never be allowed entry into another US university because of his book and views.

None of these narratives will ever be mainstream as they all place an unwelcome spin or revision or narrative on that which has already been decided.

I feel therefore that the video Simon linked and the tactics revealed within are totally applicable to other areas of the media.

In essence. What you receive in the media and history (especially or indirectly pertaining to Jews) is entirely a positive fiction. That's not really that incendiary when you think about the wholly agreed notion of history books or school textbooks being written by the victor with their obvious positive connotations.
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:20 am

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby pov603 on Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:00 pm

Wow! That's an interesting "bio" Observer!
Also, thanks to thisisunreal for the links to Dr Tony Martin talk/speech, very informative [though I have not looked into the whole episode from other sources].
The revelations are partly enlightening and frightening both at the same time!
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby fbenario on Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:51 am

pov603 » November 19th, 2018, 12:00 pm wrote:Wow! That's an interesting "bio" Observer!

I second that. Thank you, Observer, that is the best analysis and summary of the Khazar Ashkenazi connection I've ever read.
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Engineering Racism

Postby Mansur on Thu Nov 22, 2018 4:24 am

thisisunreal » November 19th, 2018, 4:17 pm wrote:Dear Mansur, allow me to respond to a couple of your quotes with my humble opinion, if i may, which I found very interesting.
Perhaps he was not a "hoax-minded” person, meaning not being aware of the possibility of being used.

Tony Martin seems completely unaware of the wider possibilities of censorship... etc.

Sorry, thisisunreal, but you don’t seem to have found the thought of “being used” interesting at all.

Let me say (or remind you) that all their (the above four’s and of course all the others’) persecution stories are there purely to believe in.

I would say that some private experience (or firsthand knowledge) could form even barriers in these matters, the imagination becoming more sensitive and more responsive to suggestions than "normally"...

Anyway. But let me ask: What could you think more effectively enhance the "spiritual/religious" character of the holocaust than -- a Finkelstein, his holy war against bankers, in the name of the sacred issue, the unification of the new age Jewry? (Both Irving and Finkelstein can be said "with confidence" being mainstream.)

In these levels there is only one kind of opposition i.e. controlled. Imho.
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm


Return to Worldwide media deceptions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest