*
THE VICSIMS - a crucial pretext for endless wars
by Simon Shack - April 2010
The victims of 9/11: Fictitious, digital identities generated out of a computer database. This is a contention, based on analysis of
the 9/11 memorials, that has not been credibly/nor legally challenged, to this day, by a single person representing any of
the purported “3000" families.
It would appear, in fact, that many other major “terrorist attacks” attributed to “Al-Qaeda” follow a similar pattern.
The rationale behind this should emerge, after due consideration, in all its transparent logic: no mass murders of western citizens are required to sell
the phony “War on Terror” to
the public. Naturally, killing civilians “at home” is highly undesirable to
the war-mongering rascals of this world. Does this exonerate them in any way from their criminal deeds? Certainly not. How can they be stopped?
The first step is called ‘awareness’. It is high time for
the public to understand
the depth of
the rampant corruption infesting our so-called “democratically-elected” governments.
The second step is: ignore
the mainstream media - & switch off your TV sets.
The third step is: reach out for
the finest souls in
the military and tell them they are welcome back home to serve
the people - to carry out domestic and peaceful tasks.
So why was it crucial for
the 9/11 planners to simulate "3000 victims"?
Let us imagine reading this news report on September 11, 2001:
“This morning, at 6:00 AM, terrorists bombed the WTC towers which immediately collapsed. Fortunately, the towers were empty and no one was hurt.” Of course, this would have generated much outrage towards
the evil terrorist acts. Yet, would this have traumatized world opinion to such a degree as to allow instant retaliations and massive bombing-raids in foreign countries? No.
The fake war on terror crucially needs victims - or more precisely - perceived victims. In fact, it fully relies on myths of civilian, western blood.
Psyops and false-flag operations are nothing else but myth-building propaganda acts. And, as
the very word implies, an “act” can be staged. When you control a vast infrastructure comprised of key government bureaus, top military brass and mainstream media moguls, you don’t have to kill people for real. It would be much preferable to make up these people up from scratch. You might throw into
the pot a few samples of real, alternatively disappearing persons (mock deaths), just to make your deception plot harder to figure out. But you wouldn’t want to have a horde of angry families and their lawyers with
the potential clout to bust
the whole scheme apart. No, you wouldn’t want
one of those. Let alone
three thousand.
An overwhelming body of evidence (and plain common sense ) suggests that
the WTC towers were empty as they were professionally demolished behind a thick smokescreen. Electromagnetic counter-measures ensured that no one was able to operate video cameras on that morning. This was no mass murder scheme - only a massive money scam and, of course, a pretext for wars of aggression. Without casualties,
the 9/11 psyop would not have caused
the outrage it was designed to generate. Countless indications suggest that most ? or, more logically all ? of
the alleged victims were but fictitious identities. Henceforth, we should always refer to those entities as “
the Vicsims” ? a perfect neologism coined by Hoi Polloi, author of
the Vicsim Report which he wrote while visiting me in
the second part of 2009.
Ever since day one,
the major hurdle for many people to even
start considering 9/11 being an “inside job” has been:
“I can’t believe my own government would murder 3,000 of their own people”. Once this psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that
the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in
the process never was an envisaged proposition ? especially, since it would have encountered severe resistance among
the insiders involved.
The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy. To this end, an outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners was scripted and orchestrated, supported by (cheap) digital imagery and special movie effects.
http://www.septemberclues.org