Flabbergasted wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 1:43 pm
Sasha Latypova, a Ukranian....
Sasha Latypova just gave an interview to Jan Jekielek (Epoch TV) where she elaborates on the topics expounded in the video linked to in my last post. Below I will simply reproduce the figures that appear along the interview, without going into much detail or supplying references.
We have all seen the graphs depicting the grotesque spike in adverse effects caused by the clot shots, starting in January 2021:
Public health databases have a number of mechanisms designed to detect "safety signals" (abnormal trends and spikes), but all agencies (FDA, WHO, CDC, NIH, HHS, DMED, and so forth, and their accomplices around the world) have obstinately denied the existence of these obvious signals. This denial across the board is in itself a signal (and a most shocking one at that). This reportedly spurred Latypova into investigating the administrative machinery allowing for this coordinated stonewalling, with the assistance of legal researcher Katherine Watt.
The whole scamdemic operation is triggered by the declaration of a public health emergency. This allows the executive to invoke the "Defense Production Act" and the "Other Transactions Agreement", overriding the legislative branch and the judicial branch, and commission "countermeasures" which can be practically anything expedient to conduct a war, including biological/medical products. According to 21 US code § 360bbb-3, such products are exempt from the rules of “current good manufacturing practices” (CGMP) (meaning the products may be subject to accidental or intentional adulteration) and exempt from clinical investigations (thus, no clinical trials or informed consent apply). When the FDA authorized the clot shot, they were merely impersonating regulators since products made under this agreement are not labeled pharmaceuticals and do not require regulation. It is therefore also a waste of time to sue manufacturers over CGMP negligence.
In addition, the legal framework used by the government and military to run the operation protects all agencies and players through a liability immunity clause, which extends downstream to all operatives/manufacturers involved in the crime. This explains why nobody needs to worry about being prosecuted and punished.
mRNA technology is used primarily for weaponry. It is also promoted as treatment for cancers and now as a platform for vaccines, but no successful medical mRNA product exists on the market, whereas, according to Latypova, military applications have been quite effective. Interestingly, the clot shots were apparently distributed worldwide by the military, not by pharmaceutical companies. In Brazil, the clot shots have been very tightly controlled from the outset, and are only administered at government facilities, never at private clinics. This also makes it difficult to get a sample for analysis.
But how do we know when an mRNA injection is a medicament and when it is a weapon? The thing is, there is no way of knowing, even if CGMPs were enforced. Why? Because to have an mRNA-based drug approved by the FDA, only 50% of the mRNA in the product is required to be consistent with the declared code. The remaining 50% could be fragmented code or, for all we know, undeclared nefarious designer sequences. No assay can tell us what other code might be in the vial.
Renata Moon MD, shows a ridiculously large vax package insert intentionally left blank at a hearing presided over by senator Ron Johnson.
As we have seen earlier in this thread, the incidence of adverse effects varies enormously from one batch to another. Not only that, but it is possible to see a manufacturer-specific pattern:
Could this huge inter-batch and inter-manufacturer variability be due to poor manufacturing standards? Latypova says no. There is an easily discernible, non-random design behind it. When adverse effects and batches are correlated with batch labeling, certain letter/number combinations are associated with higher toxicity.
Likewise, the date of manufacture can be shown to be associated with the level of toxicity:
In a Danish study by Schmeling et al. (Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine), three levels of toxicity were discernible: high, medium and low (in addition to what seems to be placebo). When plotted, the three levels stand neatly apart, with no values in between. This study was based on a very large database and only Pfizer’s clotshot was administered in the country. This is what you would expect to see in a lab experiment with several groups of rats.
I think we can drop the “China dunnit” hypothesis, attractive as it may seem. China is just the “yellow” arm of the Nutwork, conveniently posing as a foreign, hostile power. China is the “friend” you get to buy up the land around your house for a song, without your neighbors suspecting you or raising the price.
So, what´s next? The conversion of (almost) all old and new vaccines into mRNA shots, and the injection of all livestock with mRNA products, the effect of which is intended for the end consumer. Monies are already being showered on cattle breeder associations, industries and politicians to make this happen at warp speed. No public debates, no transparent research, no consent. mRNA products are fast, easy and cheap to make, but all mRNA products have so far been failures. They have no demonstrable benefit, just injury.
