Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

I just thought I'd visit the Covid19 vaccine statistics NZ.
I'm shocked to see that 72% of those eligible have had the booster. So it's difficult to prove how many jabs it takes to be a killer. The only definite is that the excess deaths tie in with the booster program. Most jabbed getting 3 jabs within a 5-8 month time frame.
The reason for still pushing the booster, is probably because it would make it difficult to extrapolate those who die after only 1 or 2 shots.
This is why they're running scared of Barry's data, being linked to individual batches.
It really feels as though the world is full of lemmings.
https://covid19.govt.nz/news-and-data/c ... tatistics/

The mRNA broth is a quite a feat of disease engineering. It has increased the incidence of a wide range of severely debilitating illnesses (as shown by the US Military's own database, DMED) and clearly raised all-cause mortality (as shown by national mortality stats and the VAERS database, or what is left of it). Most vaccinees are not ostensibly harmed, but a certain number are hit shortly after the jab (stroke, cardiac arrest, paralysis, etc.) while others pay the price one or two years later (auto-immune disease, turbo-cancer, psychiatric conditions, etc.), making it more difficult to establish the association. To avoid all the subjective and anecdotal stuff and potential fear propaganda, the best way to look at it is epidemiologically, which can be done as long as health stats are not hidden from the public.

Anyway, adding to the spectacular versatility of the clot shots is the ability to induce fetal neurological damage compatible with autism. For what it's worth, here is a paper that just came out, showing the effect of injecting pregnant mice with Pfizer's thing.

Free access: https://link.springer.com/article/10.10 ... 23-04089-2

To summarize the findings...

Female rats injected with mRNA-based Covid vaccines during pregnancy gave birth to offspring exhibiting quantifiable symptoms of autism. When the researchers dissected the rats’ brains, they found a significantly smaller number of neurons. The damage was significantly more pronounced in male offspring than in female offspring.

antipodean wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 12:52 pm...they're running scared of Barry's data, being linked to individual batches.

Any new developments?

Flabbergasted wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:36 pm

antipodean wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 12:52 pm...they're running scared of Barry's data, being linked to individual batches.

Any new developments?

Waiting for the Court case on Feb 23rd, when conclusions reached from looking into the data will be used as a case for his defence.

Meanwhile you can follow Barry on his recently opened Twitter account..
https://twitter.com/BarryYoungNZ

This is a good listen as to why the NZ Gov. is running scared, relating to the Pfizer contract.
https://realitycheck.radio/the-inquiry- ... TvagJ73NiY

As you may remember, on 19 February 2020, The Lancet published "Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting Covid-19". The statement was signed by 27 “public health scientists”, ostensibly to “condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin”.

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPd ... %2930418-9

Based on this statement, Brian Bantugan analyzed the affiliations of the publisher (The Lancet) and the 27 authors and their universities with the WEF:

The World Economic Forum, ‘The Lancet’, and Covid-19 Knowledge Gatekeeping
https://www.ijassjournal.com/2022/V5I12/414666236.pdf

Abstract: The study investigated the links that the World Economic Forum has established with organizations and persons linked to The Lancet article titled Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Guided by the Gatekeeping Theory, appended by the Political Economy of Knowledge Theory, the study implemented an integrative literature review (textual synthesis). Relevant online pieces of literature were sampled through snowballing technique using the Google search engine platform to elucidate on the funding and ownership of the Lancet, and the 27 authors of the said article and their affiliations with higher learning institutions vis-à-vis their connections with the World Economic Forum to highlight their implications to gatekeeping and COVID-19 knowledge production in journal publications, particularly that of The Lancet. Results revealed that the WEF has penetrated all knowledge institutions that benefit from the natural COVID-19 virus origins hypothesis and the silencing of contrarian hypotheses, including the lab leak narrative. A model of the WEF knowledge production complex against the lab leak hypothesis was presented to visually represent the influence of the WEF on scientific journal gatekeeping in the context of The Lancet.

Unfortunately, the article focuses on the efforts made by the Nutwok to suppress the lab leak narrative -- in my opinion a red herring. In any case, suppressed it was, as was the use of cheap and time-tested flu medications, whichever way one interprets the fact. Be that as it may, the article is interesting from the methodological standpoint and contains some interesting tables showing connections and affiliations that, though not surprising to anyone here, do not bode well for the future of the noble pursuit of science.

A few examples:

Elsevier is owned by WEF partner RELX Group.
John Wiley & Sons published Schwab's Stakeholder Capitalism (WEF, 2022).
Springer Nature is owned by WEF partner Holtzbrinck Publishing Group.
Frontiers was founded by WEF-affiliated Henry Markram (WEF, 2022).

Submissions for the NZ Royal Commission Covid19 inquiry, start today.
Interestingly submissions close on 24th March, which will be a month after the commencement of Whistleblower Barry Young's trial.
Information divulged from the data leak during Barry's trial could be useful in making a submission. Unless of course Barry's trial gets moved back a month.
https://haveyoursay.covid19lessons.roya ... on.nz/#tor

Gopi wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:20 pm Dear Nefilimp,

Please take a look at the screening yourself, and if you find the approach taken to be lacking/compromised/controlled in any way, please feel free to take it apart right here.

Also, there is a blow-by-blow reference check on the website that is time-stamped, that will also help you timestamp your criticisms!

Simon, thank you so much for your kind words. This has been a labor of love, and offered in the same spirit.

Cheers all.

Hi Gopi, I was wondering about the effect the movie has had and about the people who are tied to this project. Did anything strange happen like infighting etc.?

Vatican City issued a 20 Euro silver coin in 2022 in extremely bad taste, depicting "a young person who is ready to receive the vaccine", as the Numista catalogue puts it. The phrase suggests the idea of "being ready to receive the host". And silver coins have a long history of betrayal...



Doubling down on his treason, Big Pharma sellout Bergoglio has just appointed mRNA technology developer Katalin Karikó to the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life.



With such a nice and clever lady brewing the broth, the next compulsory jab will be even more safe and effective.

As predicted delaying tactics from the Court today in Wellington for Barry Young's trial.
No information from the trial can now be used for submissions in the current Covid19 inquiry.
Next appearance will be at 2.15pm on 23 April. It will be another 'admin' day (not trial), due to an issue holding things up - ie [non]disclosure of evidence from the police. ie Delay tactics.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/509 ... -reappears

Now that it's only a few days before Barry Young's next court date on Tuesday 23rd April, it looks as though things are starting to hot up.

Last week Liz Gunn & Barry Young put out a video highlighting the high number of excess deaths amongst the under 40 cohort.
https://rumble.com/v4peca3-barry-young- ... ta....html

The video has obviously struck a raw nerve within the Dept. of Health.
The Dept. of Health are using the Employment Relations Authority's hearing of their case against Barry, to try and cancel Liz Gunn, (a 3rd party) demanding she take down all her material relating to Barry's Covid19 vaccine data drop, by Monday 22nd April.

https://rumble.com/v4q2u7n-they-are-cen ... ng-us.html

Setting aside the Wuhan leak distraction, the promotion of which appears to be the actual purpose of John Leake's piece (it would, with a last name like that), the information on the Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech is relevant.

Reviewing BioNTech’s Disclosure of Classes of Share Capital for the year ended December 31, 2019, I noticed the following:

On August 30, 2019, BioNTech entered into agreements with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). BMGF agreed to purchase 3,038,674 ordinary shares with nominal amount of k€ 3,039 of BioNTech for a total of k€49,864 (k$55,000). These agreements require BioNTech to perform certain research and development activities to advance the development of products for the prevention and treatment of HIV and tuberculosis. In the event of a breach of the underlying conditions, including such research and development activities, BMGF has the right to sell its shares back to BioNTech at the initial share price or fair market value, whichever is higher, subject to certain conditions. BioNTech’s ability to pay dividends is also limited under the terms of these agreements.

Less than two years after the Gates Foundation purchased the stock (pre-IPO) at $18 per share, it peaked on Aug. 6, 2021 at $389. At that price, the Foundation’s $55 million investment was worth $1,182,044,186.00 ($1.182 billion).

On September 18, 2019 — just nineteen days after the Gates Foundation took its huge position in BioNTech stock — a report titled "A World At Risk" was published by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was founded in 2018 by the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization. The report’s title page is illustrated with an image of a coronavirus, and its text is an urgent call to action for the world to invest far more in preparedness for a respiratory viral pandemic.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... 85/R24.htm
https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/ove ... ld-at-risk
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ ... irect=true