Cherry-picking I suspect was practiced so as to get the "expected" results. Lack of any of those other symptoms is also a red flag that the paper is neither here nor there.Seneca wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 10:43 amFor the second paper submitted for the prize Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85 I only found the abstract.
Were there any controls?
Even if we would suppose all these questions were properly addressed in the paper, just one case is not enough to prove anything. As they say: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and this doesn't come close. I am not arguing for more animal testing, they should be more creative. If I was paid well enough and I would have enough information about what they would inject, I wouldn't mind volunteering for a double blind study.
So the score is now Stefan Lanka 5, David Bardens 0 with 1 more to go.
I agree, Dr. Lanka is winning.
One would think that after so many years more solid research would be available.