I've heard of things where - for example - young ladies, after discussing some important aspect of their lives, I think it was lingerie brands or something like that, of course, in the intimate vicinity of their smartphones, and the next day they had ads on their Facebook/twitter pages about the topic so widely that even they had to notice.
Of course, this information does not meet even the slightest degree of reliability, - and furthermore, if one 'perceives' or 'experiences' such a thing, there is no power in the whole world, at least not in the hands of a private person, to qualify this 'experience' back into a 'supposition'.
If someone has secrets, and I don't think there is the slightest novelty in that, he should keep his mouth shut, whether he is on the internet or elsewhere (if such a thing is still possible).
In a word, its commercial use is more than likely, police access is tangible, - the question is rather who is the real owner or seller. 'Governments' or deep state' are just words. But I don't think it's important to stick to those words or invent new ones. To even dwell on these things so much is, in my opinion, more than it deserves.
_________________________________
sekito wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:39 pm... if anyone want to research history, I would suggest you start with Fomenko ...
If one 'starts with Fomenko', let me ask, what does one continue with?
Fomenko does not write history, he simply denies it. Because no one can seriously believe that he, with his computer programs and algorithms (he is a mathematician), has discovered some new, deeper meaning to history than has been hitherto understood by anyone. Of course, he claims no such thing. Doesn't even need one.
This whole business (including a good many other versions of the 'suppressed history' theme, and the predecessors) gives me the impression of a conscious-unconscious attempt in groping towards an actual 'Newspeak'. On the professional/official side, these things are called 'pseudoscience'. What a wonderful term! And how freshing to listen to the debate between them!!!!
If history and chronology are synonymous, that is, if history is nothing but, preferably, correct chronology, then the Fomenkos are next...