*
Ok, here's a little summary of my latest diggings into 7/7. Were there really 52 real victims in London that day? I do not think so. The London Bombings are such a marvellous tool to make people understand the Vicsim paradigm. Same as 9/11. Identical.
TIMELINE OF 7/7 AFTERMATH - CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF FOUL PLAY
The goofy handling of the final "death-toll" of the London Bombings exposes it as the farcical simulation that it all was. The below timeline of selected, relevant news reports goes to show, beyond reasonable doubt, that the "death-toll" must have been scripted in advance - as an integral part of Tony Blair's very own phony terror-simulation. The similarities between 9/11 and 7/7 are more than striking - we can see a distinct pattern indicating that both events were handled by the very same operational structure. Thanks to the more 'contained' nature of the London terror hoax (only "52" alleged victims), we may more easily understand how easy it is for the western "INTELLIGENCE" apparatus to fool the world - for the profit of their rogue superiors - and a bunch of conniving parasites who set up foundations, scholarships and "charities" (in honor of fictitious terror victims) designed to milk money out of unsuspecting organizations and individuals.
former Australian prime minister John Howard
It's interesting to know that John Howard was in London on 7/7, then went to the US. I'd imagine both Tony and George gave him a sound spanking for spoiling the show:
"Johnny, you fool! We've told you a zillion times to adjust the time zone on your laptop when you fly in from Down Under! See, now you've reported "52 victims" to the press - half a day before the earliest allowed release time, you schmuck! And don't bring up that old jet lag excuse again!" ...*slap*-*slap* -OUCH!-OUCH!
However - as you'll see below - the BBC is just as goofy as Howard and cocks up in even more formidable ways...
**********************JULY 8, 2005****************************
5:33am CET - DER SPIEGEL reports:
+++ Number of Deaths climbs to 52 +++
"According to statements made by the Australian government, the number of dead has risen to 52. Further deaths are feared, said Australia's Prime Minister, John Howard. In Great Britain, 37 deaths have so far been confirmed."
http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1 ... 53,00.html
8:09am CET - LA REPUBBLICA reports:
Australian prime minister says: "The victims are 52"
According to Australian prime minister John Howard, the death-toll of yesterday's bombings is 52, including 7 Australians. The figure provided by Howard clashes with that provided by the London police (37) but the prime minister has not disclosed to the press the sources of this information.
http://www.repubblica.it/2005/g/dirette ... ref=search
ABC NEWS AUSTRALIA reports:
"Australian Prime Minister John Howard says he believes the death toll from
London's terrorist bombings has reached 52, with hundreds more injured."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/20 ... 410112.htm
12:40 pm CET - DER SPIEGEL reports:
+++ Up to 20 Dead in Explosions +++
"Following a series of explosions in London, a government spokesman has told the British TV network ITV that 20 people have been killed. Police have confirmed two deaths so far. The BBC has reported an explosion in the area of Houndsditch, east London. The BBC also reported that al-Qaida terrorists may be behind the attacks."
13:42pm CET - LA REPUBBLICA reports:
None injured in the Russell Square carriage.
"The police hasn't yet been able to reach the carriage trapped near the Russell Square tube station [where 26 bodies were allegedly found eventually], but has outruled the possibility of there being any further injured people trapped in the underground. This has been clarified by the British Chief of Police Ian Blair: " With the help of the firefighters and the ambulance personnel - he said - all the survivors have been rescued and brought to safety".
**********************JULY 11, 2005****************************
THE BBC & THE GUARDIAN CONFIRM DEATH TOLL OF 52
BBC- Monday, July11 2005
"The first victim of the London bombings is named as the confirmed number of dead reaches
52."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4694069.stm
THE GUARDIAN- Monday, July11 2005
London death toll rises to
52
"The names of two women who died in last week's London bombings were made public today,
as the confirmed death toll from the attacks rose to 52."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/1 ... ksecurity8
So, 3 days later, the BBC & The Guardian finally give official confirmation of John Howard's 'magic' prediction of "52".
But there's another awful problem with that:
According to the BBC itself, and still printed very clearly in their 7/7 Obituary pages,
at least two victims (allegedly) succumbed to their injuries AFTER july 11:
**********************JULY 14, 2005****************************
"SAM LY" dies in hospital
("the only Australian victim of the London Bombings")
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 741485.stm
"When the computer worker was recovered with serious injuries from the wreckage of the bus,
his father and nephew flew to London to be at his hospital bedside.
But he died on 14 July, one week after the blast."
**********************JULY 15, 2005****************************
"LEE HARRIS" dies in hospital
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 741565.stm
"The 30-year-old was in a coma
for eight days and died on 15 July,
a day before his girlfriend's body was pulled from the wreckage of the mangled train."
**********************JULY 16, 2005****************************
"SAMANTHA BADHAM" is extracted from wreckage of mangled train
(A full nine days after the blast???
Now, hold on a second: If Great Britain would have truly needed 9 DAYS to retrieve a woman from a bombed train in London City -
by a 10-pound amateur-device in a rucksack - the Queen would have lost both WW1 and WW2!) Let's wake up, folks. This whole fable is a flippant farce.
THE OFFICIAL FINAL DEATH-TOLL OF THE LONDON BOMBINGS IS, STILL TODAY, "52 + 4 bombers". That's 56 in all.
How could the BBC have reported "52 confirmed dead" on July 11 if two (or three) victims were died AFTER that date? And how could Australia's John Howard have known the final (civilian) death toll at 5:33am(Central European Time) on July 8 ? How could the prestigious German weekly "Der Spiegel" get this information at 5:33am on July 8? Was John even awake that early in London or was this statement of his perhaps mistakenly released by John's hapless secretary down in Australia?
Now, it seems to me dreadfully "un-British" to declare people dead several days before they croak. Especially when involving victims of such a defining and traumatizing national event. I would definitely fire my coroner immediately if he played with my life like that
. Should we ask the BBC for a kind clarification?
Shall we?
*******************************************************************
A brilliant 'cartoon' by Realism - posted over at the OldElmtree forum
http://www.oldelmtree.com/index.php?topic=4680.165