Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception

89 is a lot of people to die in a tornado. I am not the expert that some people are on this forum, but this video of Al Roker looks fake to me. He's a pretty good talker, but in this video is uncharacteristically groping for words. What do people think?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp ... 0#43135460

You're right, it does look suspect. Strange that "they" feel the need to fake/exaggerate even completely expected events such as the American tornado season, but I guess it's all part of the end times programming.

Well, weathermen know better than anyone how to stand in front of green screen. Joplin is a big city for that part of the country though. It's hard to say.

This however was the big image of the morning.



That building seems to have been evacuated.

St. John’s Regional Medical Center in Joplin, part of the Sisters of Mercy Health System, was in the direct path of the tornado. Mercy President and CEO Lynn Britton said in a message that “our priorities, of course, begin first with people. We have launched a critical effort to follow up on the current location of all patients who were evacuated from St. John’s in the initial hours following the tornado. Our census at the time the tornado hit was 183. Patients were triaged through Freeman Hospital, located nearby, but were quickly dispatched to other hospitals around the region, including Mercy’s hospitals throughout southwest Missouri and northwest Arkansas.”

http://stlouisreview.com/article/2011-0 ... arities-st

That part of the country is very aware of what a tornado can do, and knows how to react safely. I would say it would be possible for this to be another exaggerated natural event. The Chicago area had a tornado watch last night from the same system. If you look at the list of warnings from last night, that's a lot of people affected, regardless of what you think the MO is, no pun intended.

http://kamala.cod.edu/svr/

gwynned wrote:89 is a lot of people to die in a tornado. I am not the expert that some people are on this forum, but this video of Al Roker looks fake to me. He's a pretty good talker, but in this video is uncharacteristically groping for words. What do people think?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp ... 0#43135460

you know it really looks like they're trying to "show-off" that Al's really there by panning the camera around like that. like "oooh! you thought this was a green-screen?! check THIS out!"

reminds me of this cgi tech of putting real people in any digital environment you need, and being able to pan around at will.
check out 1:23 - 1:32 in this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3bOpBfgOXw

also, what's up with the shadows in Al's video? the trucks in the background seem to be giving off hard sunset-esque shadows, while Al doesn't seem to be casting anything.

That whole playlist on msnbc is a trove of rhetoric, phoniness, limitations.
Watch how from discussing a major disaster these self-involved pricks end up discussing how one of them choked during the reporting. Who the fuck cares? And the moments he chokes, by the way, contain a cut that indicates the report was not live: Why not cutting the whole crying and re-shoot? Cheesy phonies...

I am undecided as to the veracity of this event. First impression, so vast it must be real --yet it has things that don't ring real. I can notice at this stage:

how the disaster area of Joplin looks similar to the Japan earthquake's;
how the video imagery from Joplin in general is limited (how many times can you show the dog rescued, the two firemen on the house, the guy with the flashlight, etc?);
how the couple of buffoons in studio are an old acquaintance from 9/11 ("listen to the terror in their voices as the tornado hits!" "thank you chief!");
how the dead are "at least 116" (wickedpedia as I write this -- yeah turn that number upside down! );

not much probably but...

...from the same playlist: also noticing the damage in Minneapolis. I was particularly stricken by these pictures:




I don't know about you. I know something about trees, and I am very surprised to see that a tree of that size (that doesn't look sick or weak) could be knocked over, without losing much foliage or breaking branches, especially when all glass windows in both houses seem to be intact.

[ADD: big pictures by Boston.com. Warriorhun if you're around: lots of wide-angles here ]

What is wrong with this picture? How do I count the ways! Are they even trying anymore or are they all on drugs?

gwynned wrote:http://images.wjla.com/weather/joplin_m ... 22_606.jpg

What is wrong with this picture? How do I count the ways! Are they even trying anymore or are they all on drugs?

wow that picture is a visual assault. they did not even TRY to make a realistic looking persepctive. compare the sizes of the people in the foreground and background. wow! the white truck in the middle ground is the same scale as the car in the foreground! the layout of the roads doesn't even make sense. this is a completely ridiculous depiction of reality...

dear god, what is this abomination? is this helicopter flying over a flattened 2D sim-city?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWNwZ1IY ... ded#at=142

That looks absolutely hilarious. Thanks for the link, grav.

gwynned wrote:89 is a lot of people to die in a tornado. I am not the expert that some people are on this forum, but this video of Al Roker looks fake to me. He's a pretty good talker, but in this video is uncharacteristically groping for words. What do people think?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp ... 0#43135460

Oh - so Al Roker the weatherman of NBC 9/11 early-morning fame is at it again, is he?

Fisheye? Nah - I'll say: fishy.


The clown is evidently green-screened over some stoopid 'panavision' imagery. Also, his twisting and turning and pointing at stuff is most hilariously contrived - and highly suggests he's just dancing around in a TV studio - nowhere near that Joplin street.

Expect his playmates Katie Couric, Matt Lauer - and the rest of the millionaire 9/11 anchors to turn out and cover the tornado. Mass deception is their job. Americans should wake up to the fact that their beloved TV sweethearts are co-adjutors in a massive, ongoing scam. What this scam is all about - and how far it will go - is for us to find out, right here on this forum. So keep it up, valiant colleagues !

The photographer for these photos is from Prague. Why would SHE get these photos? Also they belong to Getty Images. What happened to Reuters, or is this normal?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-2 ... -1953.html

nonhocapito wrote: ...from the same playlist: also noticing the damage in Minneapolis. I was particularly stricken by these pictures:




I don't know about you. I know something about trees, and I am very surprised to see that a tree of that size (that doesn't look sick or weak) could be knocked over, without losing much foliage or breaking branches, especially when all glass windows in both houses seem to be intact.

The video looks weird but I'm not sure why. Can't see why they'd fake images for this one. Where's Hoi? maybe he can head over to the north side and verify what actually happened to the trees and houses in that area? Looks like roads are still open there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79S2rMSZZzI

So we see someone come into the medical emergency and get a bandaid? I thought Al Roker was on the scene and then he's standing next to Brokaw in front of a very bad green screen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_akPBwrLl3Y
The coloring reminds me of the Zapruder tape. Furthermore: pay attention to the audiotrack; you hear the wind blowing in the mic, but you also hear a door shutting (!) and the guy that's talking in the background is clearly in a room with walls.
Typical smoke of something burning in the background (never forget the smoke if you want added dramatic effect ). Whatever is burning in the distance, the firetruck is still parked where it is and no firemen in sight
I also love how the roads are totally clean and tidy, although that could be just a 'coincidence' of course.
The 'weather channel guy' (let's call him that) is looking into the distance giving the audience the feeling of 'depth perception', but I'd stick to green screen on an outside parking lot if anyone asked me.

So let's look at who uploaded this video: http://www.youtube.com/user/REDONK2011
Joined: may 23, 2011 hmm..
7 uploaded videos: hmmm...
of which 4 are related to Joplin, 2 are musicvids from crapartists (Rihanna,Britney Spears and Beyonce) and 1 is a trailer of Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 hmmmmmmmmmm

The only subscriber and commenter on that channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/AOTSNEWS
Joined: march 15, 2011 hey, that's not long after the Japan "earthquake/tsunami"
9 uploaded videos: note: all uploaded between march 15 and april 8th
of which 4 are related to the Japan "earthquake/tsunami" and 5 are about mindless hollywood celebrities
Ow, and take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6-BEOWKpAU
Helloooo fake audiotrack!

Conclusion: probably the same persona, and this is probably how the "perps" think they can disguise themselves on youtube these days: mix in some popular mindless stuff with fake vids and make separate accounts for different events.

gwynned wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79S2rMSZZzI

So we see someone come into the medical emergency and get a bandaid? I thought Al Roker was on the scene and then he's standing next to Brokaw in front of a very bad green screen.

Why are they doing this?

These are NOT real firefighters. These are (crappy) digital inserts:





In fact - it's the same shitty software they used to produce the 9/11 imagery...